ESI研究前沿的比较分析研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]探讨ESI研究前沿的变化情况,探索ESI研究前沿的学科情报价值,有利于学科服务部门针对性地开展学科情报服务工作。[方法/过程]运用比较的方法,分析不同期的相同学科ESI研究前沿数量变化情况,根据ESI研究前沿特征,分级比较其变化规律,对同一期的不同学科研究前沿两两比对,揭示学科交叉现象。[结果/结论]ESI研究前沿具有较大的计量学情报价值,能够揭示学科发展现状与趋势。横向比较结果表明每期ESI研究前沿都有较大变化,前沿的淘汰率较高,与当今科技发展迅猛的现实吻合;分级比较结果显示,前沿领域具有相对稳定性;纵向比较发现,所有学科都存在一定程度的交叉,基础学科与其它学科的交叉融合度更高,表明当今科技发展呈现综合化的大趋势。
[Purpose/Significance]Discussing the changes of research fronts of ESI and exploring the value of subject intelligence at the research fronts of ESI is conducive to the development of subject information service by subject service departments.[Method/Process]Using comparative methods, the authors try to analyze the changes in the number of research fronts of ESI in the same discipline in different periods. According to the characteristics of ESI Research Fronts, the change rules are compared at different levels. By comparing the fronts of different disciplines in the same period, the phenomenon of interdisciplinary are revealed.[Results/Conclusion]The research fronts of ESI have great informative value of metrological intelligence, which can reveal the current status and trends of discipline. The results of horizontal comparison show that the research fronts of ESI have changed greatly, and the elimination rate of fronts is high, which is consistent with the rapid development of science and technology today. The results of grading comparison show that the front areas are relatively stable. Longitudinal comparisons show that there is a certain degree of intersection in all disciplines, and the cross-integration of basic disciplines with other disciplines is higher, indicating that the current development of science and technology presents a general trend.
[Purpose/Significance]Discussing the changes of research fronts of ESI and exploring the value of subject intelligence at the research fronts of ESI is conducive to the development of subject information service by subject service departments.[Method/Process]Using comparative methods, the authors try to analyze the changes in the number of research fronts of ESI in the same discipline in different periods. According to the characteristics of ESI Research Fronts, the change rules are compared at different levels. By comparing the fronts of different disciplines in the same period, the phenomenon of interdisciplinary are revealed.[Results/Conclusion]The research fronts of ESI have great informative value of metrological intelligence, which can reveal the current status and trends of discipline. The results of horizontal comparison show that the research fronts of ESI have changed greatly, and the elimination rate of fronts is high, which is consistent with the rapid development of science and technology today. The results of grading comparison show that the front areas are relatively stable. Longitudinal comparisons show that there is a certain degree of intersection in all disciplines, and the cross-integration of basic disciplines with other disciplines is higher, indicating that the current development of science and technology presents a general trend.
引文
[1] 梅宏,周岱.一个甲子的畅想[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2016:330-346.
[2] PRICE D D.Networks of science papers [J].Science.1965.149:510-515.
[3] 王小梅,邓启平,李国鹏,吴树仙,冷伏海,朱涛.ESI研究前沿的科学图谱及在纳米领域的应用[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(12):106-112
[4] 王颖鑫,刘德洪,刘清.Essential Science Indicators应用浅析[J].图书情报工作,2006(6):137-140.
[5] 刘静,马建霞,范云满.研究前沿探测方法概述[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014(7):34-37.
[6] 许晓阳,郑彦宁,赵筱媛,等.研究前沿探测方法的研究进展[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(6):139-144.
[7] 王立学,冷伏海.简论研究前沿及其文献计量探测方法[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(3):54-58.
[8] 李晓佳,张鹏,狄增如,等.复杂网络中的社团结构[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2008(3):19-42.
[9] 陈仕吉.科学研究前沿探测方法综述[J].现代图书情报技术,2009(9):28-33.
[10] 冯璐,冷伏海.共词分析方法理论进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32 (2):88-92.
[11] 侯海燕,刘则渊,来春娟.基于知识图谱的国际科学计量学研究前沿计量分析[J].科研管理.2009,30 (1):164-170.
[12] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院等.2016研究前沿[EB/0L].[2017-03-01].http://sciencemap.casisd.cn/fronts/public/pdf/fronts?year=2016.
[13] 边文越,王海名,邢颖,等,冷伏海.基于ESI研究前沿的纳米领域研究分析[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(10):1150-1158.
[14] 周丽英,冷伏海,左文革.引文耦合增强的共词分析方法改进研究——以ESI农业科学研究主题划分为例[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(11):120-125.
[15] 钱万强,张峰,江海燕,等.世界前沿科学发展趋势研究:基于ESI数据库和十大突破分析[J].中国科学基金,2017,31(1):66-71.
[16] 高静,段会川.JSON数据传输效率研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2011(7):2267-2270.
[2] PRICE D D.Networks of science papers [J].Science.1965.149:510-515.
[3] 王小梅,邓启平,李国鹏,吴树仙,冷伏海,朱涛.ESI研究前沿的科学图谱及在纳米领域的应用[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(12):106-112
[4] 王颖鑫,刘德洪,刘清.Essential Science Indicators应用浅析[J].图书情报工作,2006(6):137-140.
[5] 刘静,马建霞,范云满.研究前沿探测方法概述[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014(7):34-37.
[6] 许晓阳,郑彦宁,赵筱媛,等.研究前沿探测方法的研究进展[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(6):139-144.
[7] 王立学,冷伏海.简论研究前沿及其文献计量探测方法[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(3):54-58.
[8] 李晓佳,张鹏,狄增如,等.复杂网络中的社团结构[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2008(3):19-42.
[9] 陈仕吉.科学研究前沿探测方法综述[J].现代图书情报技术,2009(9):28-33.
[10] 冯璐,冷伏海.共词分析方法理论进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32 (2):88-92.
[11] 侯海燕,刘则渊,来春娟.基于知识图谱的国际科学计量学研究前沿计量分析[J].科研管理.2009,30 (1):164-170.
[12] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院等.2016研究前沿[EB/0L].[2017-03-01].http://sciencemap.casisd.cn/fronts/public/pdf/fronts?year=2016.
[13] 边文越,王海名,邢颖,等,冷伏海.基于ESI研究前沿的纳米领域研究分析[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(10):1150-1158.
[14] 周丽英,冷伏海,左文革.引文耦合增强的共词分析方法改进研究——以ESI农业科学研究主题划分为例[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(11):120-125.
[15] 钱万强,张峰,江海燕,等.世界前沿科学发展趋势研究:基于ESI数据库和十大突破分析[J].中国科学基金,2017,31(1):66-71.
[16] 高静,段会川.JSON数据传输效率研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2011(7):2267-2270.