摘要
刑民交叉案件是指案件的性质既涉及刑事法律关系又涉及民事法律关系,二者之间存在相互交叉和影响的案件,或者根据同一法律事实因所涉及的法律关系一时难以确定是刑事法律关系还是民事法律关系的案件。有关"刑民交叉"案件的处理问题十分突出,既是司法实务的难点也是社会关注的热点。从具体的司法实践来看,"先刑后民""先民后刑""刑民并行"地处理"刑民交叉"案件各有利弊。无论采用哪种方法处理"刑民交叉"案件,最终的目的是要保证司法的公平和正义。
The cross-case refers to the case where the nature of the case involves both criminal legal relationship and civil legal relationship. There are cases in which the two have mutual crossovers and influences, or it is difficult to determine the criminal legal relationship according to the legal relationship involved in the same legal fact. It is also a case of civil legal relations. The handling of the cross-case is very prominent, and it is not only a difficult point of judicial practice but also a hot spot of social concern.Judging from the specific judicial practice, the operation of "Criminal procedure prior to civil procedure","Civil procedure prior to criminal procedure" or "Criminal procedure parallels civil procedure" has their pros and cons in dealing with cross cases. Regardless of the method used to deal with cross cases, the ultimate goal is to ensure fairness and justice in the judiciary.
引文
[1]陈兴良.刑法的哲学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:56.
[2]张明楷.论刑法的谦抑性[J].法商研究(中南政法学院学报),1995(3):4-5.
[3]万毅.“先刑后民”的实践困境和理论破解[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2):9-10.
[4]江伟.刑民交叉案件处理机制研究[J].法商研究,2005(4):30.
[5]陈灿平.刑民实体法关系初探[M].北京:法律出版社,2009:201-206.
[6](美)博登海默.法理学——法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:132.
[7]万毅.“先刑后民”的实践困境和理论破解[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2):15.
[8]王志岗.对我国涉嫌犯罪的经济纠纷案件处理机制的评析及重构[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2010(5):25.
[9]董秀婕.刑民交叉法律问题研究[D].长春:吉林大学法学院,2007:45.