人:自然进化生成的存在——《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中马克思生态思想解读
|
摘要
在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中,马克思对于人与自然之间关系的前提性界定是其生态思想的鲜明特征。通过人向自然、自然向人历史生成的探究,彰显了人与人、人与自然之间关系的协同共生性以及人类历史发展的生态进化视野。马克思立足于人类发展的历史维度,准确把握劳动本质和辩证法的深刻内涵,坚持从现实出发的实践生成论路向,阐释了"两个完成"和"两个和解"的辩证关系以及人类全面发展趋向的多维视角。挖掘其深刻生态思想对当下中国生态文明的构建具有重大的现实指导意义。
In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844,Marx's primary definition of the relationship between man and nature is a distinctive feature of his ecological thought. Through the exploration of human beings to nature and nature to human history,it highlights the synergistic symbiosis between human beings,human beings and nature,and the ecological evolutionary horizon of human history. Based on the historical dimension of human development,Marx accurately grasps the profound connotation of the essence of labor and dialectics,adheres to the direction of practice generation theory based on reality,and explains the dialectical relationship between "two completions"and "two reconciliations"and the multidimensional perspectives of the overall development trend of human beings. Exploring its profound ecological thoughts has great practical guiding significance for the construction of China's current ecological civilization.
In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844,Marx's primary definition of the relationship between man and nature is a distinctive feature of his ecological thought. Through the exploration of human beings to nature and nature to human history,it highlights the synergistic symbiosis between human beings,human beings and nature,and the ecological evolutionary horizon of human history. Based on the historical dimension of human development,Marx accurately grasps the profound connotation of the essence of labor and dialectics,adheres to the direction of practice generation theory based on reality,and explains the dialectical relationship between "two completions"and "two reconciliations"and the multidimensional perspectives of the overall development trend of human beings. Exploring its profound ecological thoughts has great practical guiding significance for the construction of China's current ecological civilization.
引文
[1]徐平.马克思恩格斯生态思想及创新性发展[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):16.
[2]解保军,李建军.马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态辩证法思想及其启示[J].马克思主义与现实,2008(3):112.
[3]刘海霞.《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态思想及其启示[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2016(4):119.
[4]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[5]彭福扬,彭曼丽.马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态思想及其意义[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012(6):32.
[6]罗川.对马克思资本主义生态批判思想的实践解读[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):130.
[7]崔晓峥,王洪波.马克思恩格斯生态思想的三重意蕴及特质[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):30-31.
[2]解保军,李建军.马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态辩证法思想及其启示[J].马克思主义与现实,2008(3):112.
[3]刘海霞.《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态思想及其启示[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2016(4):119.
[4]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[5]彭福扬,彭曼丽.马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的生态思想及其意义[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012(6):32.
[6]罗川.对马克思资本主义生态批判思想的实践解读[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):130.
[7]崔晓峥,王洪波.马克思恩格斯生态思想的三重意蕴及特质[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):30-31.