网络治理视域下森林资源治理模式探析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of Forest Resource Governance Model from the Perspective of Network Governance
  • 作者:王凯
  • 英文作者:Wang Kai;College of Economics and Management, Guizhou Institute of Technology;
  • 关键词:森林资源治理 ; 公众参与度 ; 网络治理 ; 利益相关方 ; 治理网络框架
  • 英文关键词:forestry resources governance;;public participation;;network governance;;stakeholder;;governance network framework
  • 中文刊名:SJLY
  • 英文刊名:World Forestry Research
  • 机构:贵州理工学院经济管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-22 12:06
  • 出版单位:世界林业研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.32
  • 基金:贵州省软科学项目“供给侧改革视角下的贵州省资源产业经济驱动因素及转型路径研究”([2016]1511-1);; 贵州省理论创新联合课题“网络治理视阈下森林资源治理模式研究”(GZLCLH-2019-66);; 贵州理工学院高层次人才科研启动经费项目“资源诅咒假说下旅游型城市的经济驱动因素及转型研究”
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SJLY201903003
  • 页数:5
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-2080/S
  • 分类号:16-20
摘要
通过梳理相关文献发现,国外对有关森林资源治理问题的研究更为系统,以自然资源治理理论为基础,创新发展出强调公众参与度提升的协同性治理理念,关注公众参与的网络治理理论现已成为研究切入的新视角。文中以构建我国森林资源多层次治理网络为主线,结合国内外研究进展,提出一种适于我国的森林资源治理网络框架,以期推动森林资源治理问题的探讨,为治理途径的构建与创新提供借鉴。
        This paper reviewed the relevant research and analyzed research features and area, and it argues that the results of foreign comprehensive research are more systematic. It has innovative developed the concept of collaborative governance that is emphasizing the improvement of public participation based on the theory of natural resource governance. Further, the theory and method of network governance have been a new perspective to research forestry resource governance. In this paper, we construct a multi-level forest resources governance network framework as the main line, and it combines the recent research progress to promote the discussion of forest resources governance. What's more, it designs a suitable network framework for forest resources governance in China, in order to provide some reference for the construction and innovation of governance approaches.
引文
[1]AGRAWAL A.Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources[J].World Development,2001,29(10):1649-1672.
    [2]BALLABH V,BALOONI K,DAVE S.Why local resources management institutions decline:a comparative analysis of van (forest) panchayats and forest protection committees in India[J].World Development,2002,30 (12):2153-2167.
    [3]SHACKLETON S,CAMPBELL B M,WOLLENBERG E,et al.Devolution and community-based forestry resource management:creating space for local people to participate and benefit[J].Natural Resource Perspective,2002,76:1-6.
    [4]CLEAVER F.Development through bricolage:rethinking institutions for forestry resource management[M].UK:Routledge Publishers,2012.
    [5]HOWARD T M.‘Raising the bar’:the role of institutional frameworks for community engagement in Australian natural resource governance[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2017,49:78-91.
    [6]IDRISSOU L,VAN PAASSEN A,AARTS N,et al.From cohesion to conflict in participatory forest management:the case of Ouémé Supérieur and N’Dali (OSN) forests in Benin[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2011,13 (7):525-534.
    [7]FAYE P.Choice and power:resistance to technical domination in Senegal’s forest decentralization[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2015,60:19-26.
    [8]LARCOM S,VAN GEVELT T,ZABALA A.Precolonial institutions and deforestation in Africa[J].Land Use Policy,2016,51:150-161.
    [9]何俊.自然资源治理:概念和研究框架[J].绿色中国,2005(9):26-29.
    [10]赵敏娟,徐涛,姚柳杨,等.生态文明背景下自然资源治理体系的框架设计[J].中国环境管理,2015(5):26-32.
    [11]黄智宇.生态文明语境下中国自然资源多元治理体系之优化[J].江西社会科学,2017(10):218-226.
    [12]龙贺兴,刘金龙.基于多中心治理视角的京津冀自然资源治理体系研究[J].河北学刊,2018(1):133-138.
    [13]DE LO? R C,MURRAY D,BRISBOIS M C.Perspectives of forestry resource sector firms on collaborative approaches to governance for water[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,135:1117-1128.
    [14]BALAG’KUTU T A.Enhancing citizen engagement in forestry resource governance:scope,content and input in the operation of the extractive industries transparency initiative[J].The Extractive Industries and Society,2017(4):775-778.
    [15]YEBOAH-ASSIAMAH E,MULLER K,DOMFEH K A,et al.Institutional assessment in natural resource governance:a conceptual overview[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2017,74:1-12.
    [16]艾昆鹏,徐雅杰.公共资源治理困境与治理模式选择[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(社会科学版),2017(2):40-46.
    [17]O′TOOLEl JR L J.Networks and networking:the public administration agendas[J].Public Administration Review,2015,75(3):361-371.
    [18]李维安,林润辉,范建红.网络治理研究前沿与述评[J].南开管理评论,2014(10):43-53.
    [19]CRONA B,HUBACEK K.The right connections:how do social networks lubricate the machinery of forestry resource governance?[J].Ecology and Society,2010,15(4):18.
    [20]马捷,锁利铭,CHEN B.水资源治理中的网络结构对比:基于社会网络特征的视角[J].复旦公共行政评论,2014(11):129-149.
    [21]ERNSTSON H,BARTHEL S,ANDERSSON E,et al.Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services:the case of Stockholm[J].Ecology and Society,2010,15(4):28.
    [22]SCHULZ T,LIEBERHERR E,ZABEL A.Network governance in national Swiss forest policy:balancing effectiveness and legitimacy[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2018,89:42-53.
    [23]KHAN J.What role for network governance in urban low carbon transitions?[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,50:133-139.
    [24]SANDSTR?M A,BODIN CRONA B.Network governance from the top:the case of ecosystem-based coastal and marine management[J].Marine Policy,2015,55:57-63.
    [25]KOZOVá M,DOB?INSKá Z,PAUDIST?OVá E,et al.Network and participatory governance in urban forestry:an assessment of examples from selected Slovakian cities[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2018,89:31-41.
    [26]SECCO L,FAVERO M,MASIERO M,et al.Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector:observations from Italy[J].Land Use Policy,2017,62:79-100.