新时代人民法庭参与乡村治理的理论逻辑与反思
|
摘要
人民法庭参与乡村治理是新时代国家权力运作的战略选择,是应对新时期乡村传统治理能力衰退的需要,也是人民法庭功能定位的政治治理化的体现。人民法庭参与乡村治理在现实中是对能动司法理念的承继与推广,农村诉讼网络的建立是人民法庭参与乡村治理的表现形式,同时,人民法庭参与乡村治理还创建了乡村社会的"和谐无讼",助力了农村基层社会的治安防控与重大决策。应从人民法庭的"治理化司法形态"、人民法庭参与乡村治理限度、人民法庭参与乡村治理的具体运作等角度进行深刻反思,以期人民法庭更好助力新时代的乡村治理。
The people's courts participating in rural governance is a strategic choice of state power in the new age. It is the need to dealing with recession of traditional rural governance capacity of rural society in the new age and the reflection of politicization of the function of the people's court. The people's courts participating in rural governance is inheriting and promoting of conception of activisting judicial in reality. The establishing of rural litigation network is a form of the people's courts participating in rural governance. At the same time,the people's courts participating in rural governance also creats a state of no litigation in rural,helps the public security prevention and control and major policy decisions in rural to be in a good state. A deep reflection on the governance of judicial form,on the boundaries and on the specific operation of the people's courts participating in rural governance can make the people's court much more useful in the rural governance.
The people's courts participating in rural governance is a strategic choice of state power in the new age. It is the need to dealing with recession of traditional rural governance capacity of rural society in the new age and the reflection of politicization of the function of the people's court. The people's courts participating in rural governance is inheriting and promoting of conception of activisting judicial in reality. The establishing of rural litigation network is a form of the people's courts participating in rural governance. At the same time,the people's courts participating in rural governance also creats a state of no litigation in rural,helps the public security prevention and control and major policy decisions in rural to be in a good state. A deep reflection on the governance of judicial form,on the boundaries and on the specific operation of the people's courts participating in rural governance can make the people's court much more useful in the rural governance.
引文
[1]刘泽军,崔俊杰.乡村治理与司法回应——从基层人民法庭参与新农村建设切入[J].河南警察学院学报,2012,(2):5-11.
[2]苏力.送法下乡——中国基层司法制度研究[M].修订版.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[3]苏力.关于能动司法[J].法律适用,2010,(Z1):5-10.
[4]陈卯轩,管艳萍.中国式能动司法的关键拼图——以云南祥云巡回法庭“便民司法经验”为中心的分析[J].西南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版,2017,(1):100-107.
[5]张晋藩.综论中国法制的近代化[M]∥俞可平.中国学者论民主与法治.重庆:重庆出版社,2008.
[6]李凌云.新时代人民法庭参与乡村治理的司法逻辑——基于北京市Z人民法庭的分析[J].福建行政学院学报,2018,(3):71-78.
[7]张青.乡村司法的理论困境与法治化治理理论之提出[J].人大法律评论,2015,(1):64-89.
[8]潘云波.论司法应对金融创新所应扮演的角色及其理性[EB/OL][2018-08-07]http:∥www. shezfy. com/view. html? id=11450.
[9]卢祖新,娄必县.从法庭到村庄:法院参与乡村治理的路径、危机与对策——兼评农村便民诉讼网络建设的意义[J].法律适用,2012,(1):87-91.
[2]苏力.送法下乡——中国基层司法制度研究[M].修订版.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[3]苏力.关于能动司法[J].法律适用,2010,(Z1):5-10.
[4]陈卯轩,管艳萍.中国式能动司法的关键拼图——以云南祥云巡回法庭“便民司法经验”为中心的分析[J].西南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版,2017,(1):100-107.
[5]张晋藩.综论中国法制的近代化[M]∥俞可平.中国学者论民主与法治.重庆:重庆出版社,2008.
[6]李凌云.新时代人民法庭参与乡村治理的司法逻辑——基于北京市Z人民法庭的分析[J].福建行政学院学报,2018,(3):71-78.
[7]张青.乡村司法的理论困境与法治化治理理论之提出[J].人大法律评论,2015,(1):64-89.
[8]潘云波.论司法应对金融创新所应扮演的角色及其理性[EB/OL][2018-08-07]http:∥www. shezfy. com/view. html? id=11450.
[9]卢祖新,娄必县.从法庭到村庄:法院参与乡村治理的路径、危机与对策——兼评农村便民诉讼网络建设的意义[J].法律适用,2012,(1):87-91.