新疆城镇居民对草原生态保护补偿支付意愿分析
|
摘要
基于新疆城镇居民的问卷调查和访谈结果显示,83. 11%受访城镇居民对草原生态保护补偿具有支付意愿,支付方式以到草原保护区休闲旅游购买门票为主。16. 89%受访城镇居民对草原生态保护补偿不具有支付意愿,其原因主要是认为草原生态保护应该由国家出资,而不应该由个人出资。根据意愿调查法估算出,城镇居民每人每年的平均支付意愿为154. 74～186. 20元/年,相当于38. 95～46. 87元/hm~2·年。通过二元Logistic模型回归结果显示,对草原生态保护补偿支付意愿具有显著影响的因素有:文化程度、年收入、草原退化程度判断、实施草原生态保护补偿后草原生态环境变化、对草原生态价值的认同、家庭居住地与草原的距离、去过草原的次数等。城镇居民的性别、年龄和职业对草原生态保护补偿的支付意愿的影响不显著。
Based on questionnaire data of urban residents in Xinjiang,the empirical research was conducted on the willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation and its influencing factors for the residents in the cities. The contingent valuation and logistic regression were used to analyze the resulting data. The results showed that 83. 11% of the respondents had willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation,and the payment method is to buy the tickets for the leisure travel of the grassland reserve mainly. 16. 89% of the respondents had no willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation,because they think the grassland ecological protection should be funded by the state rather than by individuals. The urban residents preferred to pay 154. 74-186. 20 CNY,namely 38. 95 ～ 46. 87 CNY/hm~2. The gender,age and occupation of the urban residents had no significant influence on the willingness for grassland ecological compensation. The willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation of the urban residents was mainly affected by education level,income level,degree of grassland degradation,change of grassland ecology after implementation of grassland ecological compensation policies,recognition of grassland ecosystem services value,distance between home and grassland,and times of visiting to the grassland.
Based on questionnaire data of urban residents in Xinjiang,the empirical research was conducted on the willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation and its influencing factors for the residents in the cities. The contingent valuation and logistic regression were used to analyze the resulting data. The results showed that 83. 11% of the respondents had willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation,and the payment method is to buy the tickets for the leisure travel of the grassland reserve mainly. 16. 89% of the respondents had no willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation,because they think the grassland ecological protection should be funded by the state rather than by individuals. The urban residents preferred to pay 154. 74-186. 20 CNY,namely 38. 95 ～ 46. 87 CNY/hm~2. The gender,age and occupation of the urban residents had no significant influence on the willingness for grassland ecological compensation. The willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation of the urban residents was mainly affected by education level,income level,degree of grassland degradation,change of grassland ecology after implementation of grassland ecological compensation policies,recognition of grassland ecosystem services value,distance between home and grassland,and times of visiting to the grassland.
引文
[1]巩芳.草原生态四元补偿主体模型的构建与演进研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(2):21-26.
[2]杨冉,马军.跨区域草原生态补偿的经济学分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(6):47-51.
[3]接玉梅,葛颜祥,徐光丽.黄河下游居民生态补偿认知程度及支付意愿分析-基于对山东省的问卷调查[J].农业经济问题,2011(8):95-101.
[4]李国志.城镇居民公益林生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(16):98-102.
[5]张冰,申韩丽,王朋薇,等.长白山自然保护区旅游生态补偿支付意愿分析[J]林业资源管理,2013(1):68-75.
[6]于文金,谢剑,邹欣庆.基于CVM的太湖湿地生态功能恢复居民支付能力与支付意愿相关研究[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):7271-7278.
[7]高汉琦,牛海鹏,方国友,等.基于CVM多情景下的耕地生态效益农户支付/受偿意愿分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2116-2123.
[8]郑雪梅,白泰萱.大伙房水源受水城市居民生态补偿支付意愿及影响因素分析[J].湿地科学,2016,14(1):65-71.
[9]巩芳,王芳,长青,等.内蒙古草原生态补偿意愿的实证研究[J].经济地理,2011,31(1):144-148.
[10]Zhen L,Li F,Yan H M,et al. Herders'willingness to accept versus the public sector's willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2014(9):1-15.
[11]Hanemann W M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8(4):19-43.
[12]Kristr9m B. Spike models in contingent valuation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1997,79(3):1013-1023.
[13]Marije S,Roy B. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation[J]. Ecological Economics,2012,79:21–31.
[2]杨冉,马军.跨区域草原生态补偿的经济学分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(6):47-51.
[3]接玉梅,葛颜祥,徐光丽.黄河下游居民生态补偿认知程度及支付意愿分析-基于对山东省的问卷调查[J].农业经济问题,2011(8):95-101.
[4]李国志.城镇居民公益林生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(16):98-102.
[5]张冰,申韩丽,王朋薇,等.长白山自然保护区旅游生态补偿支付意愿分析[J]林业资源管理,2013(1):68-75.
[6]于文金,谢剑,邹欣庆.基于CVM的太湖湿地生态功能恢复居民支付能力与支付意愿相关研究[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):7271-7278.
[7]高汉琦,牛海鹏,方国友,等.基于CVM多情景下的耕地生态效益农户支付/受偿意愿分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2116-2123.
[8]郑雪梅,白泰萱.大伙房水源受水城市居民生态补偿支付意愿及影响因素分析[J].湿地科学,2016,14(1):65-71.
[9]巩芳,王芳,长青,等.内蒙古草原生态补偿意愿的实证研究[J].经济地理,2011,31(1):144-148.
[10]Zhen L,Li F,Yan H M,et al. Herders'willingness to accept versus the public sector's willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2014(9):1-15.
[11]Hanemann W M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8(4):19-43.
[12]Kristr9m B. Spike models in contingent valuation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1997,79(3):1013-1023.
[13]Marije S,Roy B. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation[J]. Ecological Economics,2012,79:21–31.