单维短式无聊倾向量表在大学生群体的信效度检验
|
摘要
目的:本土化修订短式无聊倾向量表,并在大学生群体中检验该量表的信效度。方法:共招募745名大学生(年级跨度为大一至大四,男生495人,女生250人)施测,其中468人完成短式无聊倾向量表,多维状态无聊量表,短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表,特质孤独量表以及Buss和Perry攻击问卷,四周后成功召回其中的185人进行无聊倾向的重测;网络成瘾大学生38人与非成瘾大学生76人完成短式无聊倾向量表;另163人主观评估自身无聊程度后完成短式无聊倾向量表。结果:短式无聊倾向量表各条目得分与量表总分的相关系数均在0.7以上,探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析均支持了该量表的单维性,拟合指标良好(χ~2/df=1.90,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.03,CFI=0.98,TLI=0.97)。短式无聊倾向量表分半信度,内部一致性系数,重测信度分别为0.91,0.92与0.88,该量表得分与状态无聊,焦虑,抑郁,压力,攻击性,特质孤独均存在中高程度正相关关系(r>0.4, P<0.01),同时,结果发现,男生-女生(t=3.12,P<0.01),网络成瘾组-非成瘾组(t=3.64, P<0.01),自评无聊高分组-自评无聊低分组(t=5.2, P<0.01)在短式无聊倾向量表得分均存在显著差异。结论:中文版短式无聊倾向量表各条目具有良好的区分度,量表的信度与效度均符合测量学要求。
Objective: Localize the Short Boredom Proneness Scale(SBPS), and test its reliability and validity. Methods: A total of 745 Chinese undergraduate students(freshman year to senior year, 495 were male and 250 were female) participated in this study. 468 participants were asked to complete the SBPS, Multidimensional State Boredom Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, Trait Loneliness Scale, and Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire, and among them, 185 participants were recalled to re-test the SBPS four weeks after the first investigation. 38 internet addiction and 76 non-addiction undergraduates were asked to respond to SBPS. Additionally, other 163 participants were asked to evaluate their level of boredom, and then completed the SBPS. Results: The correlation coefficients between the score of each item and the total score of the scale were all above 0.7. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-factor model of the scale, and the fitness indicators were χ~2/df=1.90, RMSEA=0.06, SRMR=0.03, CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97. The split-half reliability coefficient, Cronbach α coefficient, and test-retest reliability coefficient for SBPS were 0.91, 0.92 and 0.88 respectively. The result of SBPS was significantly correlated with state boredom, depression, anxiety, stress, trait loneliness, and aggression(r>0.4, P<0.01). Additionally, male participants got higher scores in SBPS than female participants(t=3.12, P<0.01). Similar findings were observed between internet addiction groups and non-addiction groups(t=3.64, P<0.01), and between high self-evaluated boredom group and low self-evaluated boredom group(t=5.2, P<0.01). Conclusion: SBPS has good reliability and validity, and can be used to evaluate the boredom tendency difference.
Objective: Localize the Short Boredom Proneness Scale(SBPS), and test its reliability and validity. Methods: A total of 745 Chinese undergraduate students(freshman year to senior year, 495 were male and 250 were female) participated in this study. 468 participants were asked to complete the SBPS, Multidimensional State Boredom Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, Trait Loneliness Scale, and Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire, and among them, 185 participants were recalled to re-test the SBPS four weeks after the first investigation. 38 internet addiction and 76 non-addiction undergraduates were asked to respond to SBPS. Additionally, other 163 participants were asked to evaluate their level of boredom, and then completed the SBPS. Results: The correlation coefficients between the score of each item and the total score of the scale were all above 0.7. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-factor model of the scale, and the fitness indicators were χ~2/df=1.90, RMSEA=0.06, SRMR=0.03, CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97. The split-half reliability coefficient, Cronbach α coefficient, and test-retest reliability coefficient for SBPS were 0.91, 0.92 and 0.88 respectively. The result of SBPS was significantly correlated with state boredom, depression, anxiety, stress, trait loneliness, and aggression(r>0.4, P<0.01). Additionally, male participants got higher scores in SBPS than female participants(t=3.12, P<0.01). Similar findings were observed between internet addiction groups and non-addiction groups(t=3.64, P<0.01), and between high self-evaluated boredom group and low self-evaluated boredom group(t=5.2, P<0.01). Conclusion: SBPS has good reliability and validity, and can be used to evaluate the boredom tendency difference.
引文
1 Vodanovich SJ, Watt JD. Self-report measures of boredom:An updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 2016, 150(2):196-228
2 van Tilburg WA, Igou ER, Sedikides C. In search of meaningfulness:Nostalgia as an antidote to boredom. Emotion,2013, 13(3):450-461
3 Conroy RM, Golden J, Jeffares I, et al. Boredom-proneness,loneliness, social engagement and depression and their association with cognitive function in older people:a population study. Psychology, Health&Medicine, 2010, 15(4):463-473
4 周扬,陈健芷,张辉,等.大学生核心自我评价对认知失败的影响:无聊倾向的中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2017, 25(1):132-137
5 周浩,王琦,董妍.无聊:一个久远而又新兴的研究主题.心理科学进展, 2012, 20(1):98-107
6 Chaney MP, Blalock AC. Boredom proneness, social connectedness, and sexual addiction among men who have sex with male internet users. Journal of Addictions&Offender Counseling, 2006, 26(2):111-122
7 Elpidorou A. The bright side of boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, 5(1245):1-8
8 李晓敏,辛铁钢,尚文晶,等.简版无聊倾向量表在大学生群体中的试用.中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):1029-1033
9 Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness--the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1986, 50(1):4-17
10 Malkovsky E, Merrifield C, Goldberg Y, et al. Exploring the relationship between boredom and sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 2012, 221(1):59-67
11 刘勇,陈健芷,宋琳婷,等.无聊倾向量表(BPS):中文版的结构,信度及效度.中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(1):74-77
12 Vodanovich SJ. Psychometric measures of boredom:A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 2003, 137(6):569-595
13 Vodanovich SJ, Wallace JC, Kass SJ. A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale:Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005, 85(3):295-303
14 Melton AM, Schulenberg SE. A confirmatory factor analysis of the boredom proneness scale. The Journal of Psychology,2009, 143(5):493-508
15 Struk AA, Carriere JS, Cheyne JA, et al. A short Boredom Proneness Scale:development and psychometric properties.Assessment, 2017, 24(3):346-359
16 Isacescu J, Struk AA, Danckert J. Cognitive and affective predictors of boredom proneness. Cognition and Emotion,2017, 31(8):1741-1748
17 Kenah K, Bernhardt J, Cumming T, et al. Boredom in patients with acquired brain injuries during inpatient rehabilitation:a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2017,1(1):1-10
18 刘勇,陈健芷,姜梦,等.多维状态无聊量表中文版在中国大学生中的应用.中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(4):558-561
19龚栩,谢熹瑶,徐蕊,等.抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告.中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(4):443-446
20 刘平.状态与特质性孤独量表.增刊.中国心理卫生杂志,1999. 289
21 李献云,费立鹏,张亚利,等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度.中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2011, 37(10):607-613
2 van Tilburg WA, Igou ER, Sedikides C. In search of meaningfulness:Nostalgia as an antidote to boredom. Emotion,2013, 13(3):450-461
3 Conroy RM, Golden J, Jeffares I, et al. Boredom-proneness,loneliness, social engagement and depression and their association with cognitive function in older people:a population study. Psychology, Health&Medicine, 2010, 15(4):463-473
4 周扬,陈健芷,张辉,等.大学生核心自我评价对认知失败的影响:无聊倾向的中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2017, 25(1):132-137
5 周浩,王琦,董妍.无聊:一个久远而又新兴的研究主题.心理科学进展, 2012, 20(1):98-107
6 Chaney MP, Blalock AC. Boredom proneness, social connectedness, and sexual addiction among men who have sex with male internet users. Journal of Addictions&Offender Counseling, 2006, 26(2):111-122
7 Elpidorou A. The bright side of boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, 5(1245):1-8
8 李晓敏,辛铁钢,尚文晶,等.简版无聊倾向量表在大学生群体中的试用.中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):1029-1033
9 Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness--the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1986, 50(1):4-17
10 Malkovsky E, Merrifield C, Goldberg Y, et al. Exploring the relationship between boredom and sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 2012, 221(1):59-67
11 刘勇,陈健芷,宋琳婷,等.无聊倾向量表(BPS):中文版的结构,信度及效度.中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(1):74-77
12 Vodanovich SJ. Psychometric measures of boredom:A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 2003, 137(6):569-595
13 Vodanovich SJ, Wallace JC, Kass SJ. A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale:Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005, 85(3):295-303
14 Melton AM, Schulenberg SE. A confirmatory factor analysis of the boredom proneness scale. The Journal of Psychology,2009, 143(5):493-508
15 Struk AA, Carriere JS, Cheyne JA, et al. A short Boredom Proneness Scale:development and psychometric properties.Assessment, 2017, 24(3):346-359
16 Isacescu J, Struk AA, Danckert J. Cognitive and affective predictors of boredom proneness. Cognition and Emotion,2017, 31(8):1741-1748
17 Kenah K, Bernhardt J, Cumming T, et al. Boredom in patients with acquired brain injuries during inpatient rehabilitation:a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2017,1(1):1-10
18 刘勇,陈健芷,姜梦,等.多维状态无聊量表中文版在中国大学生中的应用.中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(4):558-561
19龚栩,谢熹瑶,徐蕊,等.抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告.中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(4):443-446
20 刘平.状态与特质性孤独量表.增刊.中国心理卫生杂志,1999. 289
21 李献云,费立鹏,张亚利,等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度.中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2011, 37(10):607-613