贿赂关系中运用互动仪式进行“道德化”的分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:An Analysis of Using Interaction Rituals for Moralization in Bribery
  • 作者:阮极
  • 英文作者:RUAN Ji;College of Politics and Law,Hanshan Normal University;
  • 关键词:反腐 ; 关系 ; 人情 ; 互动仪式 ; 贿赂 ; 仪式资本
  • 英文关键词:anti-corruption;;relationship;;personal relations;;interaction rituals;;bribery;;ritual capital
  • 中文刊名:HSSC
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Hanshan Normal University
  • 机构:韩山师范学院政法学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:韩山师范学院学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40;No.159
  • 基金:2017年潮州市文化研究专项资金项目(项目编号:Z17075)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HSSC201901012
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:44-1423/G4
  • 分类号:76-82
摘要
人情及其互动仪式为贿赂行为提供道德上的支撑。贿赂时,贿赂双方运用互动仪式进行的表演有其"道德化"的功能,而且这种"道德化"有两种不同的目的:一是用来掩饰贿赂的不合法性和不符合公德性;二是用来掩盖人情中的工具性成分,对违反私德行为进行掩饰。不同人的"道德化"目的可能不同,这取决于当事人当时是否意识到他们的所做所为是违法的、不正当的,也取决于贿赂当事人之间关系的亲疏。
        Personal relations and their interaction rituals offer moral support to the acts of bribery.The interaction ritual used in bribery,or so-called"moralization"may have two different goals:one is to cover the illegal and immoral practice of bribery;the other is to cover the instrumental ele?ment of personal relations,thus concealing moral violations.Such goal depends on whether the actor notices his/her practice is illegal and immoral at the time, and on the closeness of the relationship between the briber and the bribee.
引文
[1]Dunfee T W,Warren D E.Is guanxi ethical?Anormative analysis of doing business in China[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2011,32(3):191-204.
    [2]Husted B W.Wealth,culture,and corruption[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1999,30(2):339-360.
    [3]Smart A.Gifts,bribes,and guanxi:A reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital[J].Cultural Anthropology,1993,8(3):388-408.
    [4]Noonan J.Bribes[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1984:10-11.
    [5]费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:29-61.
    [6]陈乔见.公德与私德辨正[J].社会科学,2011(2):128-133.
    [7]梁启超.新民说[M].北京:商务印书馆,2016:19.
    [8]梁漱溟.中国文化要义[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2011:64.
    [9]Ruan J.Interaction Rituals in Guanxi Practice and the Role of Instrumental li[J].Asian Studies Review,2017,41(4):664-678.
    [10]Bell Catherine.Ritual:Perspectives and Dimensions[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1997:1-98.
    [11]Goffman E.Interaction Ritual:Essays on Face-toFace Behavior[M].New York:Anchor,1967:56-57.
    [12]Collins R.Interaction Ritual Chains[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2004:27-67.
    [13]Ruan J.Guanxi,Social Capital and School Choice in China:The Rise of Ritual Capital[M].London:Palgrave Macmillan,2017:75-179.
    [14]Ruan J.Ritual Capital:A Proposed Concept from Case Study of School Selection in China[J].Asian Journal of Social Science,2017,45(3):316-339.
    [15]Trompenaars F,Hampden-Turner C.Riding the Waves of Culture:Understanding cultural diversity in business[M].London:Nicholas Brealey,1993:35-39.
    [16]Hofstede G H.Culture’s consequences[M].London:Sage,2001:49-150.
    [17]Hampden-Turner C,Trompenaars F.Building crosscultural competence[M].London:Yale University Press,2000:78-80.
    [18]阮极.人情对贿赂及其“道德化”的影响——基于找关系入学的民族志研究[J].社会学研究,2018(2):189-213.
    [19]柯珠军,岳磊.人情视角下我国腐败行为的文化透视[J].开放时代,2014(2):219-223.
    [20]Yan Y.The Flow of Gifts:Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1996:1-138.
    [21]李辉.贿赂中的自我道德化与嵌入性腐败:基于H市纪检监察机关档案的一项文本研究[J].社会,2009,29(6):85-106.
    [22]岳磊,孙秋云.贿赂行为中的自我道德化分析——基于若干典型腐败案例[J].社会科学家,2012(11):102-105.
    [23]Barbalet J.The Structure of Guanxi:Resolving Problems of Network Assurance[J].Theory and Society,2014,43(1):51-69.