技术创新补贴对关联企业技术创新的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influence of Technological Innovation Subsidy on Technological Innovation in Affiliated Enterprises
  • 作者:符栋良 ; 缪毅
  • 英文作者:Fu Dongliang;Miao Yi;Shanghai Business School;China Securities Regulatory Commission;
  • 关键词:技术创新补贴 ; 关联企业 ; 技术创新 ; 合作博弈
  • 英文关键词:technology innovation subsidy;;related enterprises;;technology innovation;;mutual cooperation game
  • 中文刊名:KJGL
  • 英文刊名:Science and Technology Management Research
  • 机构:上海商学院;中国证券监督管理委员会;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-10
  • 出版单位:科技管理研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.419
  • 基金:上海市人民政府发展研究中心课题“‘科技创新板’对企业技术创新的促进作用实证研究及对策建议”(2016-YJ-C09)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KJGL201901003
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:44-1223/G3
  • 分类号:27-31
摘要
将关联企业作为研究目标,加入企业吸收能力这一内部因素变量、技术创新补贴这一外部因素变量构建函数博弈模型,并对关联企业相互竞争和相互合作两种情况进行比较,分析技术创新补贴对企业技术创新活动的影响,为政府制定相关激励企业技术创新活动的政策提供建议。认为对于技术创新成功概率大的企业或者项目,政府更应该加大对其提供技术创新补贴;在对企业提供技术创新补贴的时候,不能超过一定的补贴上限,要有适度区间。
        In this paper, we take affiliated enterprises as the research goal, add the internal factors variable enterprises to absorb, and external factors variable technological innovation subsidies to build a functional game model, and analyze the impact of technological innovation subsidies on the technological innovation activities of affiliated enterprises. We also provide advices for the government to formulate relevant policies to stimulate the technological innovation activities of enterprises. It is believed that the government should increase subsidies for enterprises or projects with high probability of technological innovation success; when subsidizing technological innovation of enterprises, it should not exceed a certain subsidy ceiling, but should have a moderate interval.
引文
[1]FELDMAN M P,KELLEY M R.The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers:government R&D policy,economic incentives and private firm behavior[J].Research Policy,2006,35(10):1509-1521.
    [2]ALMUS M,CZARNITZKI D.The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms'innovation activities:the case of Eastern Germany[J].Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,2003,21(2):226-236.
    [3]CZARNITZKI D,LICHT G.Additionality of public R&D transition economy:the case of Eastern Germany[J].Economics of Transition,2006,14(1):101-131.
    [4]CZARNITZKI D,TOOLE A.Business R&D and the inter-play of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2007,31(3):161-181.
    [5]HISSINGER K.R&D and subsidies at the firm level:an application of parametric and semi-parametric two-step selection models[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics,2007,23(6):729-747.
    [6]MALIK O R,KOTABE M.Dynamic capabilities,government policies,and performance in firms from emerging economies:evidence from India and Pakistan[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(3):421-450.
    [7]UN C A,MONTORO-SANCHEZ A.Public funding for product,process and organisational innovation in service industries[J].Service Industries Journal,2010,30(1):133-147.
    [8]MEULEMAN M,De MAESENEIRE W.Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’access to external financing?[J].Research Policy,2012,41(3):580-591.
    [9]陈玲,杨文辉.政府研发补贴会促进企业创新吗?:来自中国上市公司的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(3):433-442.
    [10]WALLSTEN S.The effect of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D:the case of the small business innovation research program[J].Journal of Economics,2000,31(1):82-100.
    [11]陈林,朱卫平.出口退税和创新补贴政策效应研究[J].经济研究,2008(11):74-87.
    [12]MICHAEL S C,PEARCE J A.The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship[J].Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2009,21(3):285-302.
    [13]余泳泽.创新要素集聚、政府支持与科技创新效率:基于省域数据的空间面板计量分析[J].经济评论,2011(2):93-101.