长三角城市群宜业与生态宜居融合协同发展水平、动态轨迹及其收敛性
|
摘要
研究目标:探究长三角城市群宜业与生态宜居融合协同发展水平、轨迹及二者间收敛性。研究方法:运用熵权法、融合协同度测度模型和单位根检验等方法开展实证研究。研究发现:2005～2015年,长三角城市群宜业和生态宜居融合协同发展呈现"高—低—高—高"发展轨迹和空间集聚特征;宜业建设仍滞后于生态宜居建设,2011年后南京、合肥、泰州等城市生态宜居滞后于宜业建设;浙江、安徽、江苏三省宜业与生态宜居建设具有分散性和分异性特征,城市中仅有上海、马鞍山和台州宜业与生态宜居建设具有收敛性和均衡化趋势。研究创新:构建城市群宜业与生态宜居融合协同、均衡化发展分析框架。研究价值:为推进长三角城市群宜业和生态宜居融合协同、均衡化发展提供依据和参考。
Research Objectives:This paper is to explore the synergy development level, dynamic trajectory and convergence between work adaptability and ecological livability of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Research Methods: Comprehensive application of entropy weight method, fusion synergy measure model and unit root test to carry out empirical research. Research Findings: The synergistic development of the work adaptability and ecological livability of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration shows high-low-high-high development trajectory and spatial agglomeration characteristics from 2005 to 2015; the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration work adaptability construction still lags behind ecological livability construction, but from 2011, the constructions of ecological livability in some cities such as Nanjing, Hefei, Taizhou lag behind the work adaptability construction.In the provincial units, the construction of work adaptability and ecological livability in Zhejiang, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces are characterized by decentralization and differentiation. In the city units, only the construction of Shanghai, Maanshan and Taizhou have convergence characteristics and show balanced development trend. Research Innovations: This paper creates an analytical framework of the synergistic development and balanced development for work adaptability and ecological livability. Research Value: This paper provides evidence and reference for promoting the synergy development and balanced development of the work adaptability and ecological livability.
Research Objectives:This paper is to explore the synergy development level, dynamic trajectory and convergence between work adaptability and ecological livability of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Research Methods: Comprehensive application of entropy weight method, fusion synergy measure model and unit root test to carry out empirical research. Research Findings: The synergistic development of the work adaptability and ecological livability of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration shows high-low-high-high development trajectory and spatial agglomeration characteristics from 2005 to 2015; the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration work adaptability construction still lags behind ecological livability construction, but from 2011, the constructions of ecological livability in some cities such as Nanjing, Hefei, Taizhou lag behind the work adaptability construction.In the provincial units, the construction of work adaptability and ecological livability in Zhejiang, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces are characterized by decentralization and differentiation. In the city units, only the construction of Shanghai, Maanshan and Taizhou have convergence characteristics and show balanced development trend. Research Innovations: This paper creates an analytical framework of the synergistic development and balanced development for work adaptability and ecological livability. Research Value: This paper provides evidence and reference for promoting the synergy development and balanced development of the work adaptability and ecological livability.
引文
[1]Bonnet F., Figueiredo J.B., Standing G., 2003, A Family of Decent Work Indexes [J], International Labor Review, 142 (2),213～238.
[2]Douglass M., 2002, From Global Intercity Competition to Cooperation for Livable Cities and Economic Resilience in Pacific Asia [J], Environment and Urbanization, 14 (1), 53～68.
[3]Evans P., Karras G., 1996, Convergence Revisited [J], Journal of Monetary Economics, 37 (2), 249～265.
[4]Hu R., Blakely E.J., Zhou Y., 2013, Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in Global Context [J], Urban Policy and Research, 31 (4), 435～452.
[5]Liang J., Ye Y., 2012, Research on Ecological Livable Urban Construction in Small and Medium Cities of China: A Case Study of Huaihua City [J], Journal of Landscape Research, 4 (3), 41～43.
[6]Krajnc D., Glavi P., 2005, A Model for Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Development [J], Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43 (2),189～208.
[7]Malkinapykh I., 2002, Integrated Assessment Models and Response Function Models: Pros and Cons for Sustainable Development Indices Design [J], Ecological Indicators, 2 (1), 93～108.
[8]Douglass M., 2002, From Global Intercity Competition to Cooperation for Livable Cities and Economic Resilience in Pacific Asia [J], Environment & Urbanization, 14 (1), 53～68.
[9]Evans P., 2002, Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability [M], Berkeley: University of California Press.
[10]Weiss H.M., 2002, Deconstructing Job Satisfaction Separating Evaluations, Beliefs and Affective Experiences [J], Human Resources Management Review, 12 (2),173～194.
[11] Kamp I.V.,Eidelmeijer K.L.,Marsman G., Hollander A.D.,2003,Urban Environment Quality and Human Well-being: Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts: A Literature Study [J], Landscape and Urban Planning, 65 (1～2), 5～18.
[12]Choi C.Y., 2002, A Variable Addition Panel Test for Stationarity and Confirmatory Analysis [R], Mimeo Department of Economics, University of New Hampshire.
[13]白俊红、蒋伏心:《协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效》[J],《经济研究》2015年第7期。
[14]韩骥、袁坤、黄鲁霞、孟醒:《全球城市宜居性评价及发展趋势预测——以上海为例》[J],《华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2017年第1期。
[15]李雪铭、姜斌、杨波:《城市人居环境可持续发展评价研究——以大连市为例》[J],《中国人口·资源与环境》2002年第6期。
[16]卢庆芳、彭伟辉:《中国城市“宜居、宜业、宜商”评价体系研究》[J],《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第3期。
[17]刘华军、杜广杰:《中国经济发展的地区差距与随机收敛检验——基于2000～2013年DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据》[J],《数量经济与技术经济研究》2017年第10期。
[18]刘义文、文晓茜、胡宗义:《中国污染物排放的地区差异及收敛性研究》[J],《数量经济与技术经济研究》2016年第4期。
[19]吴良镛:《人居环境科学导论》[M],北京:中国建设工业出版社,2001。
[20]杨曦:《城市规模与城镇化、农民工市民化的经济效应——基于城市生产率与宜居度差异的定量分析》[J],《经济学(季刊)》2017年第4期。
[21]张文忠:《城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法》[J],《地理科学》2007年第1期。
[22]郑思齐、徐杨菲、张晓楠、于都:《“职住平衡指数”的构建与空间差异性研究:以北京市为例》[J],《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年第4期。
[23]周志田、王海燕、杨多贵:《中国适宜人居城市研究与评价》[J],《中国人口·资源与环境》2004年第1期。
(1)由于上海市作为直辖市与省域单元不同,具有特殊性,且研究中所获数据为上海市的时间序列数据而非分县区的面板数据,因此我们将其收敛性检验放在市域单元,采用单变量单位根检验方法,并在全域和省域单元探讨。
[2]Douglass M., 2002, From Global Intercity Competition to Cooperation for Livable Cities and Economic Resilience in Pacific Asia [J], Environment and Urbanization, 14 (1), 53～68.
[3]Evans P., Karras G., 1996, Convergence Revisited [J], Journal of Monetary Economics, 37 (2), 249～265.
[4]Hu R., Blakely E.J., Zhou Y., 2013, Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in Global Context [J], Urban Policy and Research, 31 (4), 435～452.
[5]Liang J., Ye Y., 2012, Research on Ecological Livable Urban Construction in Small and Medium Cities of China: A Case Study of Huaihua City [J], Journal of Landscape Research, 4 (3), 41～43.
[6]Krajnc D., Glavi P., 2005, A Model for Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Development [J], Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43 (2),189～208.
[7]Malkinapykh I., 2002, Integrated Assessment Models and Response Function Models: Pros and Cons for Sustainable Development Indices Design [J], Ecological Indicators, 2 (1), 93～108.
[8]Douglass M., 2002, From Global Intercity Competition to Cooperation for Livable Cities and Economic Resilience in Pacific Asia [J], Environment & Urbanization, 14 (1), 53～68.
[9]Evans P., 2002, Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability [M], Berkeley: University of California Press.
[10]Weiss H.M., 2002, Deconstructing Job Satisfaction Separating Evaluations, Beliefs and Affective Experiences [J], Human Resources Management Review, 12 (2),173～194.
[11] Kamp I.V.,Eidelmeijer K.L.,Marsman G., Hollander A.D.,2003,Urban Environment Quality and Human Well-being: Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts: A Literature Study [J], Landscape and Urban Planning, 65 (1～2), 5～18.
[12]Choi C.Y., 2002, A Variable Addition Panel Test for Stationarity and Confirmatory Analysis [R], Mimeo Department of Economics, University of New Hampshire.
[13]白俊红、蒋伏心:《协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效》[J],《经济研究》2015年第7期。
[14]韩骥、袁坤、黄鲁霞、孟醒:《全球城市宜居性评价及发展趋势预测——以上海为例》[J],《华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2017年第1期。
[15]李雪铭、姜斌、杨波:《城市人居环境可持续发展评价研究——以大连市为例》[J],《中国人口·资源与环境》2002年第6期。
[16]卢庆芳、彭伟辉:《中国城市“宜居、宜业、宜商”评价体系研究》[J],《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第3期。
[17]刘华军、杜广杰:《中国经济发展的地区差距与随机收敛检验——基于2000～2013年DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据》[J],《数量经济与技术经济研究》2017年第10期。
[18]刘义文、文晓茜、胡宗义:《中国污染物排放的地区差异及收敛性研究》[J],《数量经济与技术经济研究》2016年第4期。
[19]吴良镛:《人居环境科学导论》[M],北京:中国建设工业出版社,2001。
[20]杨曦:《城市规模与城镇化、农民工市民化的经济效应——基于城市生产率与宜居度差异的定量分析》[J],《经济学(季刊)》2017年第4期。
[21]张文忠:《城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法》[J],《地理科学》2007年第1期。
[22]郑思齐、徐杨菲、张晓楠、于都:《“职住平衡指数”的构建与空间差异性研究:以北京市为例》[J],《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年第4期。
[23]周志田、王海燕、杨多贵:《中国适宜人居城市研究与评价》[J],《中国人口·资源与环境》2004年第1期。
(1)由于上海市作为直辖市与省域单元不同,具有特殊性,且研究中所获数据为上海市的时间序列数据而非分县区的面板数据,因此我们将其收敛性检验放在市域单元,采用单变量单位根检验方法,并在全域和省域单元探讨。