边境安全风险民间化解机制的运行与优化
|
摘要
对两组具有代表性的民间村寨进行实地调研后发现,边境安全风险民间化解机制的主体是民间力量,民间友好关系是其基础,地理交通和信息相通、共同的文化背景、共同的生产生活资源是其外在条件。化解机制运行的主要途径有涉外矛盾的民间调解、边境安全风险的及时预警等。可从国家认同感的普及、边境安全风险意识培养、建立完善风险共同评估机制等方面优化外在条件,将机制与法治相结合、政府与民间力量相衔接,形成边境安全防控的合力。
Field investigations on two groups of representative villages suggest that folk strong force represents the subject; friendly relations between the people represents the foundation; geographical transportation and interlinked information, common cultural background, common production and living resources represent the external conditions of nongovernmental resolution mechanism for border security risks. The approaches for operation of resolution mechanism mainly include nongovernmental resolution of intercultural conflicts and timely warning of border security risks. Therefore, efforts can be made to optimize the external conditions on the basis of popularity of national identity,border security risk awareness training, and establishment of a sound mechanism for joint risk assessment, combine mechanisms with rules of law, and link up the governments with nongovernmental forces, thus forming resultant force to prevent and control border security.
Field investigations on two groups of representative villages suggest that folk strong force represents the subject; friendly relations between the people represents the foundation; geographical transportation and interlinked information, common cultural background, common production and living resources represent the external conditions of nongovernmental resolution mechanism for border security risks. The approaches for operation of resolution mechanism mainly include nongovernmental resolution of intercultural conflicts and timely warning of border security risks. Therefore, efforts can be made to optimize the external conditions on the basis of popularity of national identity,border security risk awareness training, and establishment of a sound mechanism for joint risk assessment, combine mechanisms with rules of law, and link up the governments with nongovernmental forces, thus forming resultant force to prevent and control border security.
引文
[1]白爱萍.中越边境跨界京族的民间交往研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2012:25-41.
[2]方盛举.当代中国陆地边疆治理[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2017:2.
[3]曹睿琪.跨境民族社会秩序研究———滇越跨境民族实证调查[D].北京:中央民族大学,2012:1
[4]金炳镐,肖锐,毕跃光.论民族交流交往交融[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(1):66-69.
[5]吕朝辉.当代中国陆地边疆治理模式创新研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2015.
[6]李波.法治的意义[R].北京:中国经济研究中心,2000:81.
[7]马振超.边境少数民族地区非正式制度的影响与启示[J].牡丹江大学学报,2018(1):52-55。
[8]姚尚建.社会风险化解中的政府持续[J].晋阳学刊,2012(1):21-25.
(1)“哈亭”,是京族人民祀祖、祭神和民间娱乐的公众场所。
(1)常文谦:《中国边防史》,中国人民武装警察部队学院教材,1991年版第5页。
[2]方盛举.当代中国陆地边疆治理[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2017:2.
[3]曹睿琪.跨境民族社会秩序研究———滇越跨境民族实证调查[D].北京:中央民族大学,2012:1
[4]金炳镐,肖锐,毕跃光.论民族交流交往交融[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(1):66-69.
[5]吕朝辉.当代中国陆地边疆治理模式创新研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2015.
[6]李波.法治的意义[R].北京:中国经济研究中心,2000:81.
[7]马振超.边境少数民族地区非正式制度的影响与启示[J].牡丹江大学学报,2018(1):52-55。
[8]姚尚建.社会风险化解中的政府持续[J].晋阳学刊,2012(1):21-25.
(1)“哈亭”,是京族人民祀祖、祭神和民间娱乐的公众场所。
(1)常文谦:《中国边防史》,中国人民武装警察部队学院教材,1991年版第5页。