添加玉米粉、草粉及乳酸菌对马铃薯淀粉渣青贮发酵品质的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effect of ground corn, grass meal, and Lactobacillus on fermentation quality of tamato pulp silage
  • 作者:魏海燕 ; 闫琦 ; 王宪举 ; 丁路明
  • 英文作者:WEI Haiyan;YAN Qi;WANG Xianju;DING Luming;State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University;
  • 关键词:马铃薯淀粉渣 ; 混合青贮 ; 饲料发酵 ; 发酵特性 ; 乳酸菌 ; 青贮品质 ; 营养价值
  • 英文关键词:potato pulp;;mixed silage;;feed fermentation;;fermentation property;;lactobacillus;;fermentation quality;;nutritive value
  • 中文刊名:CYKX
  • 英文刊名:Pratacultural Science
  • 机构:兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室/兰州大学生命科学学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:草业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.311
  • 基金:青海省重大科技专项(2018-NK-A2);; 青海省重点研发与转化计划项目(2018-SF-145);; 青海省重点实验室专项(2003-Z-Y03);; 青海省科技支撑计划项目(2017-NK-154);; 甘肃省科技计划项目(17YF1WA164);; 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项(lzujbky-2018-kb07)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYKX201906020
  • 页数:9
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:62-1069/S
  • 分类号:184-192
摘要
为探究马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum)淀粉渣最优的青贮方式,本研究分别以马铃薯淀粉渣(PP)、马铃薯淀粉渣+玉米粉(PC)、马铃薯淀粉渣+燕麦草粉(PG)作为青贮原料,再以添加乳酸菌(LAB)作为处理,以添加等量蒸馏水作为空白对照(CK),经过30 d发酵后,对所有青贮饲料发酵品质进行测定。结果发现:1) PG青贮的粗蛋白(crude protein, CP)相比于PG、PP青贮显著降低(P <0.05),而PP青贮和PC青贮的差异不显著(P> 0.05)。2) PP、PC和PG青贮中性洗涤纤维(neutral detergent fiber, NDF)含量差异显著(P <0.05),与CK相比,添加LAB后PP、PC青贮的NDF和PP青贮的酸性洗涤纤维(acid detergent fiber, ADF)含量显著降低(P <0.05)。由于添加了NDF和ADF含量较高的燕麦草粉,PG青贮组NDF和ADF显著高于其余两组处理(P <0.05)。3) PP和PC青贮的相对饲喂价值(relative feed value, RFV)显著高于PG青贮(P <0.05)。4)与淀粉渣原样相比,各个处理青贮后的pH均有不同程度的降低,乳酸含量显著升高(P <0.05)。PC青贮pH显著低于PP和PG青贮。青贮饲料在添加LAB后,PC青贮组的pH和PG组的丙酸含量显著降低(P <0.05),PG青贮组的总酸含量显著升高(P <0.05)。综合适口性以及青贮后的化学成分和发酵品质各项指标,马铃薯淀粉渣和玉米粉混合青贮效果较好,而添加乳酸菌后青贮效果更佳。
        The objective of the study is to evaluate the optimal method for potato pulp silage(Solanum tuberosum)preparation. Three mixing treatments were performed with pure potato pulp(PP), potato pulp mixed with ground corn(PC),or with oat hay meal(PG). Lactobacillus(LAB) was added or not added during silage making. Distilled water was added as a control(CK). The silage samples were collected for further analysis after 30 days. The following results were obtained. 1)The crude protein(CP) contents of PG treatment were significantly reduced compared to PG and PP treatments(P < 0.05),while no significant difference was observed between PP and PC treatments(P > 0.05). 2) The neutral detergent fiber(NDF)contents of PP, PC, and PG treatments were significantly higher than CK(P < 0.05). After adding LAB, the contents of NDF in PP and PC treatments and the contents of ADF in PG treatment were significantly lower than CK(P < 0.05). The highest NDF and ADF contents were shown in PG treatment(P < 0.05). 3) The relative feed value(RFV) of PP and PC treatments was significantly higher than PG(P < 0.05). 4) Compared with the original sample of potato starch residue, the variation in pH of silage samples decreased, and the lactic acid content increased significantly(P < 0.05). The pH of PC silage was significantly lower than that of PP and PG silage. After adding LAB, the pH of PC silage and the propionate contents of PG silage decreased, and the total volatile fatty acid(TVFA) contents of PG silage increased significantly(P < 0.05). In conclusion, the optimum silage treatment for potato pulp is to mix with ground corn. The addition of LAB can promote the silage fermentation quality.
引文
[1]闫晓波.马铃薯渣和秸秆混合青贮对奶牛生产性能的影响.兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文,2009.YAN X B.Effect of mixed silage form potato residues and corn stalks on performance of dairy cows.Master Thesis.Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2009.
    [2]贠建民,刘陇生,安志刚,苏永生,郭斌.马铃薯淀粉渣生料多菌种固态发酵生产蛋白饲料工艺.农业工程学报,2010,26(S2):399-404.YUN J M,LIU L S,AN Z G,SU Y S,GUO B.Technology of single cell protein feed production from row protato starch residue by multi-strains fermentation.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2010,26(S2):399-404.
    [3]MAYER F,HILLEBRANDT J O.Potato pulp:Microbiological characterization,physical modification,and application of this agricultural waste product.Applied Microbiology&Biotechnology,1997,48(4):435.
    [4]OKINE A,HANADA M,AIBIBULA Y,OKAMOTO M.Ensiling of potato pulp with or without bacterial inoculants and its effect on fermentation quality,nutrient composition and nutritive value.Animal Feed Science&Technology,2005,121(3/4):329-343.
    [5]ZUNONG M,TUERHONG T,OKAMOTO M,HONGO A,HANADA M.Effects of a potato pulp silage supplement on the composition of milk fatty acids when fed to grazing dairy cows.Animal Feed Science&Technology,2009,152(1/2):81-91.
    [6]努尔艾拉·麦麦提敏.马铃薯淀粉渣青贮发酵的研究进展.新疆畜牧业,2016(8):17-19.Nueraila·Maimaitimin.Research progress of potato starch residue celebrating fermentation.Xin Jiang Xu Mu Ye,2016(8):17-19.
    [7]孙小凡.麦类作物青贮饲料营养价值研究.杨凌:西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2003.SUN X F.Study on nutritional value of wheat crop silage.Master Thesis.Yangling:Nothwest A&F University,2003.
    [8]RIGóE,ZSéDELY E,TóTH T,SCHMIDT J.Ensiling alfalfa with hydrolyzed corn meal additive and bacterial inoculant.Acta Agronomicaóváriensis,2011,53(2):15-23.
    [9]BURGESS P L.Yield and nutritive value of corn,barley,wheat and forage oats as silage for lactating dairy cows.Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1993,53(2):245-250.
    [10]BHANDARI S K,LI S,OMINSKI K H,WITTENBERG K M,PLAIZIER J C.Effects of the chop lengths of alfalfa silage and oat silage on feed intake,milk production,feeding behavior,and rumen fermentation of dairy cows.Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(5):1942-1958.
    [11]FILYA I.The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri,and Lactobacillus plantarum,on the fermentation,aerobic stability,and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages.Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(11):3575-3581.
    [12]贾莉,席旭东,韩向敏,姬丽君.马铃薯淀粉渣混合青贮玉米快速饲料发酵方法研究.甘肃农业科技,2016(4):4-7.JIA L,XI X D,HAN X M,JI L J.Study on the method of fast feed fermentation of potato starch slag mixed silage corn.Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology,2016(4):4-7.
    [13]王典,李发弟,张养东,卜登攀,孙鹏,周凌云.马铃薯淀粉渣-玉米秸秆混合青贮料对肉羊生产性能、瘤胃内环境和血液生化指标的影响.草业学报,2012,21(5):47-54.WANG D,LI F D,ZHANG Y D,PU D P,SUN P,ZHOU L Y.Effects of potato starch-corn stalk silage on production performance,rumen environment and blood biochemical indexes of meat sheep.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2012,21(5):47-54.
    [14]玉柱,陶莲,陈燕,云鹏.添加玉米秸秆对两种三叶草青贮品质的影响.中国奶牛,2009(4):15-18.Yu Z,TAO L,CHEN Y,YUN P.Effect of supplying corn stover on the quality of two species clover mixed silage.China Dairy Cattle,2009(4):15-18.
    [15]CHEN P F,RONG Y P,ZHU Y U,HAN J G.Determination of moisture in alfalfa by microwave oven.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2006,28(3):53-55.
    [16]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.ZHANG L Y.Analysis of Feed and Feed Quality Detection Technique.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2007.
    [17]侯建建,白春生,张庆,玉柱.单一和复合乳酸菌添加水平对苜蓿青贮营养品质及蛋白组分的影响.草业科学,2016,33(10):2119-2125.HOU J J,BAI C S,ZHANG Q,YU Z.Effects of different additive amount of single and multiple lactic acid bacteria on the silage quality and protein fractions of alfalfa.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(10):2119-2125.
    [18]秦丽萍,柯文灿,丁武蓉,石超,郭旭生.温度对垂穗披碱草青贮品质的影响.草业科学,2013,30(9):1433-1438.QIN L P,KE W C,DING W R,SHI C,GUO X S.Effects of temperature on fermentation quality of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Elymus nutans silage.Pratacultural Science,2013,30(9):1433-1438.
    [19]薛艳林,孙林,殷国梅,张园园,白春生,孙娟娟,门果桃,赵和平,玉柱,孙启忠,张宇,刘思博.生物添加剂和填装密度对菊芋青贮饲料品质的影响.畜牧与饲料科学,2017,38(1):39-43.XUE Y L,SUN L,YIN G M,ZHANG Y Y,BAI C S,SUN J J,MEN G T,ZHAO H P,YU Z,SUN Q Z,ZHANG Y,LIU S B.Effect of bio-additives and packing density on fermentation quality of Helianthus tuberosus L.silage.Animal Husbandry and Feed Science,2017,38(1):39-43.
    [20]刘辉,卜登攀,吕中旺,李发弟,刘士杰,张开展,王加启.凋萎和不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响.草业学报,2015,24(5):126-133.LIU H,BU D P,LYU Z W,LI F D,LIU S J,ZHANG K Z,WANG J Q.Effect of wilting and additive on fermentation quality of alfalfa(Medicago Sativa)silage.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(5):126-133.
    [21]施清平,徐赵红,张建国.十个玉米品种在广州种植和青贮的潜力研究.草业学报,2017,26(3):175-182.SHI Q P,XU Z H,ZHANG J G.Comparison of ten corn varieties as silage material in Guangzhou.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(3):175-182.
    [22]MOORE C A,KENNEDY S J.The effect of sugar beet pulp-based silage additives on effluent production,fermentation,in-silo losses,silage intake and animal performance.Grass&Forage Science,1994,49(1):54-64.
    [23]李海,贾玉山,格根图,李长春,张晓娜.处理方式对天然牧草青贮料有机酸的影响.草地学报,2008,16(2):154-157.LI H,JIA Y S,Gegentu,LI C C,ZHANG X N.Influence of different treatments on the organic acids of natural grass silage.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2008,16(2):154-157.
    [24]VAN SOEST P J.Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant.Beltsville:Comstock Pub,1994.
    [25]SOUZA C M,OLIVEIRA R L,VOLTOLONI T V,MENEZES D R,SANTOS NJAD.Lambs fed cassava silage with added tamarind residue:Silage quality,intake,digestibility,nitrogen balance,growth performance and carcass quality.Animal Feed Science&Technology,2017,235:50-59.
    [26]曾日秋,林永生,洪建基,黄毅斌.4个臂形草品种在闽南地区的生育特性及其相对饲用价值研究.草业科学,2009,26(8):107-111.ZENG R Q,LIN Y S,HONG J J,HUANG Y B.Study on the growth characteristic and relative feeding value of four varieties of Brachiaria decumbens in Southern Fujian.Pratacultural Science,2009,26(8):107-111.
    [27]吴端钦,朱四元,王延周,侯振平,王郝为,戴求仲.几种青贮玉米青贮发酵特性及其营养成分的比较研究.饲料研究,2017(7):48-51.WU D Q,ZHU S Y,WANG Y Z,HOU Z P,WANG H W,DAI Q Z.Comparative study of several specialty and nutrients of corn silage fermentation.Feed Research,2017(7):48-51.
    [28]马春晖,夏艳军,韩军,钱文熙,张玲,席琳,乔方雷.不同青贮添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响.草业学报,2010,19(1):128-133.MA C H,XIA Y J,HAN J,QIAN W X,ZHANG L,XI L,QIAO F L.Effects of different additives on the quality of Medicago sativa silage.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(1):128-133.
    [29]Mcdonald P,Edwards R A,Greenhalgh J F D.Animal Nutrition.6th ed.Harlow Essex:Pearson Education Limited,2002.
    [30]徐春城.现代青贮理论与技术.北京:科学出版社,2013.XU C C.Silage Science and Technology.Beijing:Science Press,2013.
    [31]韩海珠.马铃薯茎叶青贮料的制作及其对体外发酵特性的影响.兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文,2017.HAN H Z.Making of potato vines silage and its effect on rumen fermentation in vitro.Master Thesis.Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2017.
    [32]SKORY C D.Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene.Journal of Industrial Microbiology&Biotechnology,2003,30(1):22-27.
    [33]金华平,刘晓风,袁月祥,闫志英,廖银章,刘克鑫,王安.不同添加剂对玉米秸秆青贮发酵效果的影响.应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(6):1053-1057.JIN H P,LIU X F,YUAN Y X,YAN Z Y,LIAO Y Z,LIU K X,WANG A.Effect of different additives on fermentation of corn straw silage.Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology,2013,19(6):1053-1057.
    [34]张红梅,段珍,李霞,梁侯勇,张建华,李晓康.青贮饲料乳酸菌添加剂的应用现状.草业科学,2017,34(12):2575-2583.ZHANG H M,DUAN Z,LI X,LIANG H Y,ZHANG J H,LI X K.Actual research and application of the silage latic acid bacteria additives.Pratacultural Science,2017,34(12):2575-2583.
    [35]张红梅,荆佩欣,柯文灿,张娟,陈明,于应文,郭旭生.青藏高原乳酸菌对垂穗披碱草青贮饲料发酵品质的影响.微生物学报,2015,55(10):1291-1297.ZHANG H M,JING P X,KE W C,ZHANG J,CHEN M,YU Y W,GUO X S.Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tibetan Plateau on silage fermentation quality of Elymus nutans.Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2015,55(10):1291-1297.