四川盆地西南缘五峰—龙马溪组页岩气资源潜力分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:An resources potential analysis of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale gas in the southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin
  • 作者:杨平 ; 汪正江 ; 余谦 ; 刘伟 ; 刘家洪 ; 熊国庆 ; 何江林 ; 杨菲
  • 英文作者:YANG Ping;WANG Zhengjiang;YU Qian;LIU Wei;LIU Jiahong;XIONG Guoqing;HE Jianglin;YANG Fei;Chengdu Center,China Geological Survey;
  • 关键词:四川盆地西南缘 ; 五峰—龙马溪组 ; 页岩参数 ; 页岩气 ; 资源潜力 ; 有利区优选
  • 英文关键词:southwest margin of Sichuan Basin;;Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation;;shale parameters;;shale gas;;resource potential;;favorable area optimization
  • 中文刊名:DIZI
  • 英文刊名:Geology in China
  • 机构:中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:中国地质
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.46;No.392
  • 基金:中国地质调查局项目(DD20160193、DD20160176、12120114071401);; 国家自然科学基金(41772126)联合资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DIZI201903012
  • 页数:14
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-1167/P
  • 分类号:161-174
摘要
为深化认识四川盆地西南缘五峰—龙马溪组页岩储层参数特征及其资源潜力,通过地球化学、矿物组分、物性、扫描电镜、比表面-孔径和等温吸附等研究,测试分析结果表明,富有机质泥页岩(TOC>1%)厚度一般为54~162 m,优质段(TOC>2%)厚度26~70 m,有机碳平均2.99%~3.78%,硅质含量27.96%~37.0%,长石2.87%~4.85%,碳酸盐岩44.2%~54.2%,黏土9.9%~27.80%,具有低硅质、高钙质及普遍含黄铁矿等特点。埋藏环境下页岩孔隙度明显与含气性呈正相关关系,含气性越好,孔隙度越高。主要孔隙类型为有机质孔、黏土矿物晶间孔和黄铁矿晶间孔。孔隙演化可以划分为埋藏阶段有机质孔的形成、气藏破坏阶段有机质孔隙的破坏和表生岩溶3个阶段。Ro为2.38%~3.37%,古地温梯度32.57~37.55℃/km,大地热流值为84.32~97.21 mW/m2,受晚海西期岩浆活动影响,热演化程度、古地温梯度和大地热流值较高相对较高,不同地区差异较大。四川盆地西南缘五峰—龙马溪组页岩沉积相有利、页岩厚度大,各项参数良好,该区五峰—龙马溪组页岩气影响因素为有利岩相组合、较好的保存条件和相对适中的热演化程度(Ro<3.0%)。该区页岩气勘探应由"正向构造"向"稳定向斜"进行拓展,其中木杆、高桥、永盛、大谷堆等4个稳定向斜区是下一步页岩气勘探与突破的最有利区。
        Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin is an important field of shale gas exploration in the periphery of the Sichuan Basin. In order to study the parameter characteristics of shale reservoir and potential of shale gas resource in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and analyze its resource potential, the authors studied the parameters of shale by such means as geochemistry, mineral composition, scanning electron microscope, specific surface-pore diameter, and isothermal adsorption. The thickness of the organic-rich shale(TOC>1%) is generally 54-162 m, the thickness of high quality part(TOC>2%)is 26-70 m. The average organic carbon content is 2.99%-3.78%, the silicon content is 27.96%-37.0%, the feldspar content is2.87%-4.85%, the carbonate rock content is 44.2%-54.2%, and the clay content is 9.9%-27.80%. It has the characteristics of low silicon content and high carbonate rock content and generally contains pyrite. The porosity of shale in the buried environment has a positive correlation with the gas-bearing property, and the better the gas bearing property, the higher the porosity. The main pore types are organic pore, clay mineral intergranular pore and pyrite intergranular pore. The evolution of the pores could be divided into three stages: the formation of the organic pore at the burial stage, the destruction of the organic pore at the gas reservoir destruction stage and supergene karstification. The Ro is 2.38%-3.37%, the paleogeothermal gradient is 32.57-37.55℃/km, and the terrestrial heat flow value is 84.32-97.21 mW/m2. Influenced by the late Hercinian magmatic activity, the degree of thermal evolution, the paleogeothermal gradient and the terrestrial heat flow value become relatively high, and the differences between different areas could be relatively large. In Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation on the southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin, the shale deposit is favorable, the shale thickness is large, and the parameters of shale are good. The influence factors of shale gas in Longmaxi Group in this area are favorable shale deposit, good preservation condition and relatively moderate degree of thermal evolution(Ro<3.0%).Therefore, shale gas exploration should be expanded from"structural anticline"to"stable syncline"in such places as Mugan,Gaoqiao, Yongsheng and Da Gudui synclines, where there probably exists great potential of shale gas resource.
引文
Chen Xiaohong,Zhang Baomin,Zhang Guotao,Chen Lin,Zhang Miao,LI Peijun.2018.High shale gas industry flow obtained from the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Yichang area,Hubei Province[J].Geology in China,45(1):199-200(in Chinese).
    Deng Min,Hou Mingcai,Zhang Benjian,Li Xiuhua.Favorable reservoir analysis of Emeishan basalt in Zhougongshan area of southwest Sichuan Province[J].Geology in China,41(2):378-386(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Dong Dazhong,Gao Shikui,Huang Jinliang,Guan Quanzhong,Wang Shufang,Wang Yuman,2014.A discussion on the shale gas exploration and development prospect in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,34(12):1-15(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Dong Dazhong,Wang Yuman,Huang Xunan,Zhang Chenchen,Guan Quanzhong,Huang Jingliang,Wang shufang,Lixinjing.2016.Discussion about geological characteristics,resource evaluation methods and its key parameters of shale gas in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,27(9):1583-1601(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Guo Xusheng,Hu Dongfeng,Wen Zhidong,Liu Ruobing.2014.Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J].Geology in China,41(3):893-901(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Guo Xusheng.2014.Rules of two-factor enrichiment for marine shale gas in southern China--Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area[J].Act Geologica Sinica.88(7):1209-1218(in Chinese with English abstract).
    He Bin,Xu Yigang,Xiao Long,Wang Kangming,Sha Shaoli.2003.Generation and spatial distribution of the Emeishan large igneous province:New evidence from stratigraphicrecords[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,77(2):194-202(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Hood A,Gutjaha C C M,Heacock R L.1975.Organic metamorphism and the generation of petroleum[J].AAPG Bulletin,59:986-996.
    Li Shuangjian,Li Jianming,Zhou Yan,Wo Yujin,Wang Xinwei.2011.Fission track evidence for Mesozoic-Cenozoic uplifting in the southeastern margin of Sichuan basin[J].Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,30(2):225-233(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Liu Dehan,Shi Jiyang.1994.High evolution of carbonate source rocks unconventional evaluation method[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,21(3):113-115(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Mei Lianfu,Liu Zhaoqian,Tang jiguang,Shen Chuanbo,Fan Yuanfang.2010.Mesozoic intra-continental progressive deformation in western Hunan-Hubei-eastern Sichuan Provinces of China:Evidence from apatite fission track and balanced cross-section[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,35(2):161-174(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Mou Chuanlong,Ge Xiangying,Zhou Kenken,Wang Xiuping.2015.Lithofacies palaeogeography in Late Ordovician Wufeng Age in southwestern Sichuan[J].Geology in China,42(1):192-198(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Mou Chuanlong,Wang Qiyu,Wang Xiuping,Zhou Kenken,Liang Wei,Ge Xiangying,2016.A study of lithofacies-palaeogeography as a guide to geological survey of shale gas[J].Geological Bulletin of China,35(1):10-19(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Qiu Xiaosong,Hu Mingyi,Hu Zhonggui,Ye Ying,Cai Quansheng.2014.Evaluation methods and parameter assignments of shale gas resources:A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Middle Yangtze region[J].Geology in China,41(6):2091-2098(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Shibaoka M,Saxby J D,Taylor G H.1978.Hydrocarbon generation in Gippsland Basin,Australia:Comparison with Cooper Basin,Australia[J].AAPG Bulletin,62(7):1151-1158.
    Wang Wei,Zhou Zuyi,Guo Tonglou,Xu Changhai.2011.Early Cretaceous-paleocene geothermal gradients and Cenozoic tectonothermal history of Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),39(4):606-613(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Wang Zhengjiang,Xie Yuan,Yang Ping,Zhuo Jiewen,He Jianglin,Xie Shangke,2012.Marine basin evolution and oil and gas geology of Sinian-early Paleozoic period on the western side of the Xuefeng Mountain[J].Geological Bulletin of China,31(11):1795-1811(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Wei Zhihong,Wei Xiangfeng.2014.Comparison of gas-bearing property between different pore types of shale:A case from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Longmaxi Fms in the Jiaoshiba,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,34(6):37-41(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Wu Kunyu,Zhang Tingshan,Yang Yang,Liang Xing,Zhou Songyuan,Zhang Zhao.2016.Geological characteristics of WufengLongmaxi shale-gas reservoir in the Huangjinba gas field,Zhaotong National Shale Gas DemonstrationArea[J].Geology in China,43(1):275-287(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Xu Ming,Zhu Chuanqing,Tian Yuntao,Rao Song,Hu Shengbiao.2011.Borehole temperature logging and characteristics of subsurface temperature in the Sichuan Basin[J].Chinese J.Geophys.54(4):1052-1060(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Yang Ping,Xie Yuan,Wang Chuanshang,Wang Xianhui,Liu Zaoxue.2012.Characteristics and its hydrocarbon significance of hydrocarbon source rocks on upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in the western XueFeng mountains area[J].Natural Gas Industry,32(12):11-16(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Yang Ping,Xie Yuan,Wang Zhengjiang,Li Qiyan,Liu Jiahong,Zhang Di,Yang Zhi,Yin Feng.2014.Fluid activity and hydrocarbon accumulation period of Sinian Dengying Formation in northern Guizhou,South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,41(3):346-357.
    Yang Ping,Yu Qian,YinFeng,Wang Zhengjiang,Liu Jiahong,Zhang Di,Zhang Daoguang.2015.Evolution anomaly of organic matter and characteristics of palaeogeothermal field in the southeast edge of Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,26(7):1299-1309(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Zhai Gangyi,Bao Shujing,Pang Fei,Ren Shoumai,Chen Ke,Wang Yufang,Zhou Zhi,Wang Shengjian.2017.Peservoir-forming pattern of“four-storey”hydrocarbon accumulation in Anchang syncline of northern Guizhou Province[J].Geology in China,44(1):1-12(in Chinese with English abstract).
    Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,Li Jianzhong,Li Xinjing,Wang Yuman,Li Denghua,Chen Keming.2010.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,37(6):641-653(in Chinese with English abstract).
    陈孝红,张保民,张国涛,陈林,张淼,李培军.2018.湖北宜昌地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组获页岩气高产工业气流[J].中国地质,45(1):199-200.
    邓敏,侯明才,张本健,李秀华.2014.川西南部周公山地区峨眉山玄武岩有利储层分析[J].中国地质,41(2):378-386.
    董大忠,高世葵,黄金亮,管全中,王淑芳,王玉满.2014.论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业,34(12):1-15.
    董大忠,王玉满,黄旭楠,张晨晨,管全中,黄金亮,王淑芳,李新景.2016.中国页岩气地质特征、资源评价方法及关键参数[J].天然气地球科学,27(9):1583-1601.
    郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,刘若冰.2014.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素--以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,41(3):893-901.
    郭旭升.2014.南方海相页岩气“二元富集”规律--四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,88(7):1209-1218.
    何斌,徐义刚,肖龙,王康明,沙绍礼.2003.峨眉山大火成岩省的形成机制及空间展布:来自沉积地层学研究的新证据[J].地质学报,77(2):194-202.
    李双建,李建明,周雁,沃玉进,汪新伟.2011.四川盆地东南缘中新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据[J].岩石矿物学杂志,30(2):225-233.
    刘德汉,史继扬.1994.高演化碳酸盐烃源岩非常规评价方法探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,21(3):113-115.
    梅廉夫,刘昭茜,汤济广,沈传波,凡元芳.2010.湘鄂西-川东中生代陆内递进扩展变形:来自裂变径迹和平衡剖面的证据[J].地球科学,35(2):161-174.
    牟传龙,葛祥英,周恳恳,王秀平.2015.川西南晚奥陶世五峰期岩相古地理[J].中国地质,42(1):192-198.
    牟传龙,王启宇,王秀平,周恳恳,梁薇,葛祥英.2016.岩相古地理研究可作为页岩气地质调查之指南[J].地质通报,35(1):10-19.
    邱小松,胡明毅,胡忠贵,叶颖,蔡全升.2014.页岩气资源评价方法及评价参数赋值--以中扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,41(6):2091-2098.
    汪正江,谢渊,杨平,卓皆文,何江林,谢尚克.2012.雪峰山西侧震旦纪-早古生代海相盆地演化与油气地质条件[J].地质通报,31(11):1795-1811.
    王玮,周祖翼,郭彤楼,许长海.2011.四川盆地古地温梯度和中-新生代构造热历史[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),39(4):606-613.
    魏志红,魏祥峰.2014.页岩不同类型孔隙的含气性差异--以四川盆地焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,34(6):37-41.
    伍坤宇,张廷山,杨洋,梁兴,周松源,张朝.2016.昭通示范区黄金坝气田五峰-龙马溪组页岩气储层地质特征[J].中国地质,43(1):275-287.
    徐明,朱传庆,田云涛,饶松,胡圣标.2011.四川盆地钻孔温度测量及现今地热特征[J].地球物理学报,54(4):1052-1060.
    杨平,谢渊,王传尚,王先辉,刘早学.2012.雪峰山西侧上奥陶统五峰组烃源岩特征及油气地质意义[J].天然气工业,32(12):11-16.
    杨平,印峰,余谦,汪正江,刘家洪,张娣,张道光.2015.四川盆地东南缘有机质演化异常与古地温场特征[J].天然气地球科学,26(7):1299-1309.
    翟刚毅,包书景,庞飞,任收麦,陈科,王玉芳,周志,王胜建.2017.贵州遵义地区安场向斜“四层楼”页岩油气成藏模式研究[J].中国地质,44(1):1-12.
    邹才能,董大忠,王社教,李建忠,李新景,王玉满,李登华,程克明.2010.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,37(6):641-653.