声誉积累优势还是绩效积累优势?政府R&D补贴分配中“粘性”效应探究
|
摘要
通过探究政府R&D补贴分配的持续性问题,有利于减少政府行为失范,提高政府R&D补贴效率。分别从声誉积累优势和绩效积累优势探究影响政府R&D补贴分配中"粘性"效应的因素,采用2010—2013年广东省498家制造业民营企业的面板数据,应用转移概率矩阵、Probit回归分析以及PSM方法进行实证检验,结果发现:基于广东的实证数据表明,广东省政府R&D补贴"粘性"效应更有可能是基于绩效积累优势的挑选机制,进一步基于企业创新链视角检验政府R&D补贴"粘性"效应对企业创新的影响发现:政府R&D补贴"粘性"效应有利于企业研发强度提升,对企业不同模式的技术获取战略均存在积极显著的影响,但对企业新产品产值的影响不显著。
By exploring the persistence of government R&D subsidy allocation, it will help reduce government misconduct and promote high-quality development of firms. The paper explores the factors that influence the'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidy distribution from the advantages of reputation accumulation and performance accumulation. The panel data of 498 manufacturing private enterprises in Guangdong Province from 2010 to 2013 were applied, and the empirical analysis was carried out by using transfer probability matrix, probit regression analysis and PSM method. It is found that the 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies is more likely to be based on the selection mechanism of performance accumulation advantages. Further examining the impact of the 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies on firms' innovation based on the perspective of firm innovation chain: The 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies is conducive to the improvement of R&D intensity of firms, and has a positive and significant impact on the technology acquisition strategies of different modes of firms. However, the impact on the output value of new products of firms is not significant.
By exploring the persistence of government R&D subsidy allocation, it will help reduce government misconduct and promote high-quality development of firms. The paper explores the factors that influence the'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidy distribution from the advantages of reputation accumulation and performance accumulation. The panel data of 498 manufacturing private enterprises in Guangdong Province from 2010 to 2013 were applied, and the empirical analysis was carried out by using transfer probability matrix, probit regression analysis and PSM method. It is found that the 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies is more likely to be based on the selection mechanism of performance accumulation advantages. Further examining the impact of the 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies on firms' innovation based on the perspective of firm innovation chain: The 'stickiness' effect of government R&D subsidies is conducive to the improvement of R&D intensity of firms, and has a positive and significant impact on the technology acquisition strategies of different modes of firms. However, the impact on the output value of new products of firms is not significant.
引文
郭迎锋,顾炜宇,乌天玥,等.2016.政府资助对企业R&D投入的影响:来自我国大中型工业企业的证据[J].中国软科学,3:162-174.
柳光强.2016.税收优惠、财政补贴政策的激励效应分析:基于信息不对称理论视角的实证研究[J].管理世界,10:62-71.
伍健,田志龙,龙晓枫,等.2018.战略性新兴产业中政府R&D补贴对企业创新的影响[J].科学学研究,1:158-166.
杨洋,魏江,罗来军.2015.谁在利用政府R&D补贴进行创新?所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,1:75-86.
余明桂,回雅甫,潘红波.2010.政治联系、寻租与地方政府财政补贴有效性[J].经济研究,3:65-77.
Arrow K J.1972.Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[J].Nber Chapters,12:609-626.
Boeing P.2016.The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies:Evidence from listed firms[J].Research Policy,45(9):1774-1789.
Bogers M,Afuah A,Bastian B.2010.Users as innovators:A review,critique,and future research directions:[J].Journal of Management,36(4):857-875.
Cantner U.2012.Picking the winner?Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups[J].Small Business Economics,39(4):921-936.
Choi J,Lee J.2017.Repairing the R&D market failure:Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D[J].Research Policy,46(8):1465-1478.
Clausen T H.2009.Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level?[J].Structural Change&Economic Dynamics,20(4):239-253.
Crossan M M,Apaydin M.2010.A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation:A systematic review of the literature[J].Journal of Management Studies,47(6):1154-1191.
David P A,Hall B H,Toole A A.2000.Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D?A review of the econometric evidence[J].Research Policy,29(4):497-529.
Dimos C,Pugh G.2016.The effectiveness of R&D subsidies:A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature[J].Research Policy,45(4):797-815.
Dumont M.2017.Assessing the policy mix of public support to business R&D[J].Research Policy,46(10):1851-1862.
Guo D,Guo Y,Jiang K.2016.Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation:Evidence from China[J].Research Policy,45(6):1129-1144.
Rosenbaum P,Rubin D.1984.Comment:Estimating the effects caused by treatments[J].Publications of the American Statistical Association,79(385):26-28.
Saarenketo S,Puumalainen K,Kuivalainen O,et al.2004.Dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SMEs[J].International Journal of Production Economics,89(3):363-378.
Sabine B,Wim V.2015.Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs):External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators[J].Journal of Small Business Management,53(4):1241-1263.
Shleifer A,Vishny R W.1994.Politicians and firms[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(4):995-1025.
Silva A M,Silva S T,Carneiro A.2017.Determinants of grant decisions in R&D subsidy programmes:Evidence from firms and S&T organisations in Portugal[J].Science&Public Policy,44(5):683-697.
Spanjol J,Qualls W J,Rosa J A.2011.How many and what kind?The role of strategic orientation in new product ideation[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,28(2):236-250.
Vrande V V D,Vanhaverbeke W,Duysters G.2011.Additivity and complementarity in external technology sourcing:The added value of corporate venture capital investments[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,58(3):483-496.
Wu A.2017.The signal effect of government R&D subsidies in China:Does ownership matter?[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,117:339-345.
Zuniga-Vicente J A,Alonso-Borrego C,Forcadell F J,et al.2014.Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&Dinvestment:A survey[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,28(1):36-67.
柳光强.2016.税收优惠、财政补贴政策的激励效应分析:基于信息不对称理论视角的实证研究[J].管理世界,10:62-71.
伍健,田志龙,龙晓枫,等.2018.战略性新兴产业中政府R&D补贴对企业创新的影响[J].科学学研究,1:158-166.
杨洋,魏江,罗来军.2015.谁在利用政府R&D补贴进行创新?所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,1:75-86.
余明桂,回雅甫,潘红波.2010.政治联系、寻租与地方政府财政补贴有效性[J].经济研究,3:65-77.
Arrow K J.1972.Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[J].Nber Chapters,12:609-626.
Boeing P.2016.The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies:Evidence from listed firms[J].Research Policy,45(9):1774-1789.
Bogers M,Afuah A,Bastian B.2010.Users as innovators:A review,critique,and future research directions:[J].Journal of Management,36(4):857-875.
Cantner U.2012.Picking the winner?Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups[J].Small Business Economics,39(4):921-936.
Choi J,Lee J.2017.Repairing the R&D market failure:Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D[J].Research Policy,46(8):1465-1478.
Clausen T H.2009.Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level?[J].Structural Change&Economic Dynamics,20(4):239-253.
Crossan M M,Apaydin M.2010.A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation:A systematic review of the literature[J].Journal of Management Studies,47(6):1154-1191.
David P A,Hall B H,Toole A A.2000.Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D?A review of the econometric evidence[J].Research Policy,29(4):497-529.
Dimos C,Pugh G.2016.The effectiveness of R&D subsidies:A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature[J].Research Policy,45(4):797-815.
Dumont M.2017.Assessing the policy mix of public support to business R&D[J].Research Policy,46(10):1851-1862.
Guo D,Guo Y,Jiang K.2016.Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation:Evidence from China[J].Research Policy,45(6):1129-1144.
Rosenbaum P,Rubin D.1984.Comment:Estimating the effects caused by treatments[J].Publications of the American Statistical Association,79(385):26-28.
Saarenketo S,Puumalainen K,Kuivalainen O,et al.2004.Dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SMEs[J].International Journal of Production Economics,89(3):363-378.
Sabine B,Wim V.2015.Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs):External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators[J].Journal of Small Business Management,53(4):1241-1263.
Shleifer A,Vishny R W.1994.Politicians and firms[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(4):995-1025.
Silva A M,Silva S T,Carneiro A.2017.Determinants of grant decisions in R&D subsidy programmes:Evidence from firms and S&T organisations in Portugal[J].Science&Public Policy,44(5):683-697.
Spanjol J,Qualls W J,Rosa J A.2011.How many and what kind?The role of strategic orientation in new product ideation[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,28(2):236-250.
Vrande V V D,Vanhaverbeke W,Duysters G.2011.Additivity and complementarity in external technology sourcing:The added value of corporate venture capital investments[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,58(3):483-496.
Wu A.2017.The signal effect of government R&D subsidies in China:Does ownership matter?[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,117:339-345.
Zuniga-Vicente J A,Alonso-Borrego C,Forcadell F J,et al.2014.Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&Dinvestment:A survey[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,28(1):36-67.