不同嫁接方式对红厚壳成活率及抽芽数的影响
|
摘要
红厚壳(Calophyllum inophyllum)是热带地区多功能的优良树种。为筛选出适宜的红厚壳嫁接技术,研究采用完全随机区组设计,设置了不同嫁接方式、穗条类型、穗条存放时间等3因素不同水平的嫁接试验,分析不同嫁接处理组合对成活率和抽芽数的影响。研究结果表明:劈接、合接、切接3种不同嫁接方式中切接的成活率最高,显著高于合接和劈接;半木质化穗条比木质化穗条嫁接成活率高3.5个百分点,差异未达到显著水平;穗条存放0～2 d后嫁接的成活率显著高于存放3 d;利用存放2 d的半木质化穗条进行切接,抽芽数最多,达到3.9个。综合分析,采用半木质化穗条存放0～2 d后进行切接有利于提高红厚壳嫁接的成活率。
Calophyllum inophyllum is a multifunctional tree species, naturally distributed in tropic area.In order to screen out suitable grafting technology of C. inophyllum, and to provide reference for strengthening resource conservation and cultivation on this species, a grafting experiment was conducted with different grafting methods, cutting types, and storage time of cuttings by adopting completely randomized block design to analyze the effects of different grafting treatment combinations on survival rate and the number of cion budding. The results showed that the survival rate of the cutting grafting was the highest among the three different grafting methods, which was significantly higher than the other two methods. The survival rate of the semi-lignified cuttings was 3.5% higher than that of the lignified cuttings, but the differences between the two cutting types didn't reach a significant level. The survival rate of the graftings stored for 0～2 days was significantly higher than that of those done for 3 days. Cutting grafting with semi-lignified cuttings kept for 2 days led to the highest budding number, which was 3.9. It was concluded that cutting grafting with semi-lignified cuttings stored for 0～2 days was advantageous in increasing the survival rate of the graftings of C. inophyllum.
Calophyllum inophyllum is a multifunctional tree species, naturally distributed in tropic area.In order to screen out suitable grafting technology of C. inophyllum, and to provide reference for strengthening resource conservation and cultivation on this species, a grafting experiment was conducted with different grafting methods, cutting types, and storage time of cuttings by adopting completely randomized block design to analyze the effects of different grafting treatment combinations on survival rate and the number of cion budding. The results showed that the survival rate of the cutting grafting was the highest among the three different grafting methods, which was significantly higher than the other two methods. The survival rate of the semi-lignified cuttings was 3.5% higher than that of the lignified cuttings, but the differences between the two cutting types didn't reach a significant level. The survival rate of the graftings stored for 0～2 days was significantly higher than that of those done for 3 days. Cutting grafting with semi-lignified cuttings kept for 2 days led to the highest budding number, which was 3.9. It was concluded that cutting grafting with semi-lignified cuttings stored for 0～2 days was advantageous in increasing the survival rate of the graftings of C. inophyllum.
引文
[1]LIM T K.Calophyllum inophyllum[M].Springer Netherlands,2012:169-178.
[2]吴德邻.海南及广东沿海岛屿植物名录[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.
[3]贾瑞丰,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.红厚壳的研究进展及应用前景[J].林业与环境科学,2011,27(2):85-90.
[4]PATIL A D,FREYER A J,EGGLESTON D S,et al.The inophyllums,novel inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase isolated from the Malaysian tree,Calophyllum inophyllum Linn.[J].Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,1993,36(26):4131-4138.
[5]LAURE F,RAHARIVELOMANANA P,BUTAUD J F,et al.Screening of anti-HIV-1 inophyllums by HPLC-DAD of Calophyllum inophyllum leaf extracts from French Polynesia Islands[J].AnalyticaChimicaActa,2008,624(1):147-153.
[6]ASAAH E,TCHOUNDJEU Z,NGAHANE W,et al.Allanblackia floribunda:a new oil tree crop for Africa:amenability to grafting[J].New Forests,2011,41(3):389-398.
[7]陈娟,陶忠良.红厚壳野生资源的开发型保护途径分析[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(11):1029-1031.
[8]贾瑞丰,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.红厚壳种子发芽试验的初步研究[J].林业科技通讯,2011(7):24-26.
[9]ZOU W,JIA R,YANG J,et al.Optimum nitrogen fertilization of Calophyllum inophyllum seedlings under greenhouse conditions[J].Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering,2016,3(4):368-374.
[10]张军,刘蕊,范海阔,等.红厚壳高空压条繁殖技术研究[J].农学学报,2013,3(5):56-57.
[11]许德成,王小菁.红厚壳茎段丛生芽诱导与植株再生[J].植物学报,2014,49(2):167-172.
[12]周璋,李意德,林明献,等.海南岛尖峰岭热带山地雨林区26年的热量因子变化特征[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(6):1006-1012.
[13]郭传友,黄坚钦,方炎明.植物嫁接机理研究综述[J].江西农业大学学报,2004,26(1):144-148.
[14]杨曾奖,徐大平,张宁南,等.降香黄檀嫁接技术研究[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(5):674-676.
[15]郭乔仪,鲁菊芬.云南楚雄核桃改良切接法嫁接育苗技术[J].果树实用技术与信息,2015(12):25-26.
[16]韩东锋,钱拴提,孙德祥,等.山茱萸改进嵌芽接嫁接技术试验[J].防护林科技,2006(6):21-22.
[17]马婷,陈宏伟,熊新武,等.砧木、接穗的选择对美国山核桃嫁接成活率及生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(4):141-143.
[18]周东果,高俊燕,李进学,等.不同嫁接方式对柠檬苗嫁接成活率及生长的影响[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(2):687-690.
[19]许丽萍,唐红燕,贾平,等.穗条木质化程度和储存时间对思茅松容器苗嫁接成活率的影响[J].湖南林业科技,2014,41(5):9-12.
[20]林起艺.不同嫁接方式对龙脑樟成活率的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(23):105-107.
[21]江泽鹏,张乃燕,王东雪,等.穗条农艺性状对油茶岑软3号芽苗砧嫁接的影响[J].广西林业科学,2012,41(4):362-364.
[22]杨世杰,卢善发.植物嫁接基础理论研究(下)[J].生物学通报,1995(10):4-6.
[23]黄云鹏,王邦富,范繁荣,等.无患子单芽低位嫁接技术研究[J].林业资源管理,2011(6):69-72.
[2]吴德邻.海南及广东沿海岛屿植物名录[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.
[3]贾瑞丰,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.红厚壳的研究进展及应用前景[J].林业与环境科学,2011,27(2):85-90.
[4]PATIL A D,FREYER A J,EGGLESTON D S,et al.The inophyllums,novel inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase isolated from the Malaysian tree,Calophyllum inophyllum Linn.[J].Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,1993,36(26):4131-4138.
[5]LAURE F,RAHARIVELOMANANA P,BUTAUD J F,et al.Screening of anti-HIV-1 inophyllums by HPLC-DAD of Calophyllum inophyllum leaf extracts from French Polynesia Islands[J].AnalyticaChimicaActa,2008,624(1):147-153.
[6]ASAAH E,TCHOUNDJEU Z,NGAHANE W,et al.Allanblackia floribunda:a new oil tree crop for Africa:amenability to grafting[J].New Forests,2011,41(3):389-398.
[7]陈娟,陶忠良.红厚壳野生资源的开发型保护途径分析[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(11):1029-1031.
[8]贾瑞丰,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.红厚壳种子发芽试验的初步研究[J].林业科技通讯,2011(7):24-26.
[9]ZOU W,JIA R,YANG J,et al.Optimum nitrogen fertilization of Calophyllum inophyllum seedlings under greenhouse conditions[J].Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering,2016,3(4):368-374.
[10]张军,刘蕊,范海阔,等.红厚壳高空压条繁殖技术研究[J].农学学报,2013,3(5):56-57.
[11]许德成,王小菁.红厚壳茎段丛生芽诱导与植株再生[J].植物学报,2014,49(2):167-172.
[12]周璋,李意德,林明献,等.海南岛尖峰岭热带山地雨林区26年的热量因子变化特征[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(6):1006-1012.
[13]郭传友,黄坚钦,方炎明.植物嫁接机理研究综述[J].江西农业大学学报,2004,26(1):144-148.
[14]杨曾奖,徐大平,张宁南,等.降香黄檀嫁接技术研究[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(5):674-676.
[15]郭乔仪,鲁菊芬.云南楚雄核桃改良切接法嫁接育苗技术[J].果树实用技术与信息,2015(12):25-26.
[16]韩东锋,钱拴提,孙德祥,等.山茱萸改进嵌芽接嫁接技术试验[J].防护林科技,2006(6):21-22.
[17]马婷,陈宏伟,熊新武,等.砧木、接穗的选择对美国山核桃嫁接成活率及生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(4):141-143.
[18]周东果,高俊燕,李进学,等.不同嫁接方式对柠檬苗嫁接成活率及生长的影响[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(2):687-690.
[19]许丽萍,唐红燕,贾平,等.穗条木质化程度和储存时间对思茅松容器苗嫁接成活率的影响[J].湖南林业科技,2014,41(5):9-12.
[20]林起艺.不同嫁接方式对龙脑樟成活率的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(23):105-107.
[21]江泽鹏,张乃燕,王东雪,等.穗条农艺性状对油茶岑软3号芽苗砧嫁接的影响[J].广西林业科学,2012,41(4):362-364.
[22]杨世杰,卢善发.植物嫁接基础理论研究(下)[J].生物学通报,1995(10):4-6.
[23]黄云鹏,王邦富,范繁荣,等.无患子单芽低位嫁接技术研究[J].林业资源管理,2011(6):69-72.