矿产资源利益可参与分配主体的逻辑重构
|
摘要
作为一种自然禀赋和客观存在,矿产资源蕴含巨大的价值和利益,人类生存发展的基础就是对利益的占有和使用,因而矿产资源利益分配形态对国家社会个体均至关重要。在矿产资源社会化生产链条逐步实现利益的过程中,需要严谨考量利益范畴、可参与分配依据及对应主体,使其规范体系遵循秩序理性与公平正义的价值。现有的相关学术观点存在思路规则固化、要素辨析失衡和理论创新失准等问题和不足,需要从思维、制度与推理层面进行辨析。需要继续深入研究矿产资源利益与收益、可参与分配主体依据、和谐劳动关系与弱相关者补偿机制等理论问题,建构更加严谨周密的矿产资源利益分配逻辑规范体系,让参与主体真正共享改革发展的成果。
As a natural endowment and objective existence,mineral resources contain huge value and interests,the basis of human survival and development is the possession and use of interests,so mineral resources benefit distribution form is crucial to national,social and individuals. The process to achieve the interests of mineral resources in the social production chain,needs to rigorous consider the interests category,the distribution basis which people participate in and the corresponding subject,to ensure the standard system follow the order of value about rationality and justice. The relevant academic points exist some problems and deficiencies,such as the rules of thinking are solidification,the element discrimination is unbalanced,and the theoretical innovation is inaccurate,which needs to analyze from thinking,system analysis and reasoning level. In the new era,it is necessary to further study the profit of mineral resources and the benefits,the basis of the distributable subject,the harmonious labor relations,the compensation mechanism of weak stakeholders and so on,construct a more rigorous and detailed logical and normative system for the distribution of mineral resources,to achieve the participants can truly share the achievements of reform and development.
As a natural endowment and objective existence,mineral resources contain huge value and interests,the basis of human survival and development is the possession and use of interests,so mineral resources benefit distribution form is crucial to national,social and individuals. The process to achieve the interests of mineral resources in the social production chain,needs to rigorous consider the interests category,the distribution basis which people participate in and the corresponding subject,to ensure the standard system follow the order of value about rationality and justice. The relevant academic points exist some problems and deficiencies,such as the rules of thinking are solidification,the element discrimination is unbalanced,and the theoretical innovation is inaccurate,which needs to analyze from thinking,system analysis and reasoning level. In the new era,it is necessary to further study the profit of mineral resources and the benefits,the basis of the distributable subject,the harmonious labor relations,the compensation mechanism of weak stakeholders and so on,construct a more rigorous and detailed logical and normative system for the distribution of mineral resources,to achieve the participants can truly share the achievements of reform and development.
引文
[1]亚当·斯密.国富论[M].郭大力,等译,北京:商务印书馆,2014:269-280.
[2]罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:293.
[3]靖学青.自然资源开发与中国经济增长——“资源诅咒”假说的反证[J].经济问题,2012(3):4-8.
[4]马克思恩格斯文集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:436.
[5]王继军,赵大为.矿产资源国家所有者民事收益权问题研究——以煤炭资源有偿取得为例[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2012(9):40-50.
[6]朱学义.矿产资源权益理论与应用研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:80-94.
[7]李海东,沈渭寿,贾明,等.大型露天矿山生态破坏与环境污染损失的评估[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015(6):112-117.
[8]韩克勇.从我国社会主要矛盾的转化谈继续深化供给侧结构性改革[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(3):31-38.
[2]罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:293.
[3]靖学青.自然资源开发与中国经济增长——“资源诅咒”假说的反证[J].经济问题,2012(3):4-8.
[4]马克思恩格斯文集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:436.
[5]王继军,赵大为.矿产资源国家所有者民事收益权问题研究——以煤炭资源有偿取得为例[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2012(9):40-50.
[6]朱学义.矿产资源权益理论与应用研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:80-94.
[7]李海东,沈渭寿,贾明,等.大型露天矿山生态破坏与环境污染损失的评估[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015(6):112-117.
[8]韩克勇.从我国社会主要矛盾的转化谈继续深化供给侧结构性改革[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(3):31-38.