被追诉人程序参与权的保障救济机制——以审判阶段法院损害被追诉人程序参与权为视角
|
摘要
对于审判阶段人民法院损害被追诉人程序参与权的行为,我国规定了检察机关的监督和法院的上诉两种救济方式,但这两种救济方式均难以实现救济的目的。我国要解决法院损害被追诉人程序参与权的救济问题,出路在于建立独立的程序性上诉机制。
The people's court prosecuted violations program participation behavior,our country rules supervision and procuratorial organs of the court of appeal of two kinds of relief,but these two kinds of relief methods are difficult to achieve the purpose of relief. In order to solve the problem of the court's right to participate in the proceedings of the accused,the solution lies in the establishment of an independent procedural appeal mechanism.
The people's court prosecuted violations program participation behavior,our country rules supervision and procuratorial organs of the court of appeal of two kinds of relief,but these two kinds of relief methods are difficult to achieve the purpose of relief. In order to solve the problem of the court's right to participate in the proceedings of the accused,the solution lies in the establishment of an independent procedural appeal mechanism.
引文
[1]郝银钟.检察机关的角色定位与诉讼职能的重构[J].中国人民大学学报,1999(3):19.
[2]陈卫东,郝银钟.被告人诉讼权利与程序救济论纲——基于国际标准的分析[J].中外法学,1999(3):26.
[3]丁建军.公民程序性权利及其价值考量[J].山东社会科学,2006(9):17.
[4]魏文彪.程序公正是实体公正的前提[J].人大研究,2004(4):15.
[2]陈卫东,郝银钟.被告人诉讼权利与程序救济论纲——基于国际标准的分析[J].中外法学,1999(3):26.
[3]丁建军.公民程序性权利及其价值考量[J].山东社会科学,2006(9):17.
[4]魏文彪.程序公正是实体公正的前提[J].人大研究,2004(4):15.