湖南乡村振兴实证研究
|
摘要
在全面贯彻落实乡村振兴战略之际,研究制定一套乡村振兴评价指标体系,对于各地诊断乡村发展问题、监测乡村振兴进程、完善乡村振兴政策具有指导意义。从农业多功能视角构建了包括5个一级指标与25个二级指标的乡村振兴评价指标体系,并采用层次分析法评价了2016年湖南14个市州的乡村振兴水平。结果表明:1)湖南乡村振兴水平存在显著的地域差异,长沙最高,达0.915,张家界最低,为0.635;从区域来看,湘北地区最高,然后依次是湘东、湘南、湘中、湘西。2)乡村振兴水平较高的地区,产业兴旺、生态宜居、生活富裕程度普遍较高,其中产业兴旺起着关键作用,但乡村经济发展并不必然带来乡风文明和治理有效。湖南乡村振兴应重点把握以"特"兴农和加快农村一二三产业融合发展、建设生态宜居美丽乡村、以乡村文化建设带动乡风文明建设、推进乡村治理体系和治理能力现代化、提高农村公共服务有效供给和农民收入水平。
On the occasion of the full implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the study and formulation of a set of evaluation indicators system for rural revitalization is of guiding significance for diagnosing rural development problems, monitoring the process of rural revitalization, and improving rural revitalization policies. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of rural revitalization including 5 primary indicators and 25 secondary indicators from the perspective of agricultural multifunction, and evaluates the rural revitalization level of 14 cities and counties in Hunan in 2016 by using analytic hierarchy process. The results show that: 1) There are significant regional differences in the level of rural revitalization in Hunan. Changsha has the highest level, reaching 0.915, and Zhangjiajie has the lowest level, which is 0.635; From the regional point of view, the northern part of Hunan is the highest, followed by Xiangdong,Xiangnan, Xiangzhong and Xiangxi. 2) In areas with high levels of rural revitalization, industries are prosperous,ecologically livable, and generally have a high degree of affluence. Among them, industrial prosperity plays a key role,but rural economic development does not necessarily bring about rural civilization and effective governance. Hunan rural revitalization should focus on promoting agriculture with "special" and accelerating the integration and development of rural industries, building ecological and livable beautiful villages, promoting the construction of rural civilization with rural cultural construction, promoting the modernization of rural governance system and governance ability, and improving the effective supply of rural public services and farmers income.
On the occasion of the full implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the study and formulation of a set of evaluation indicators system for rural revitalization is of guiding significance for diagnosing rural development problems, monitoring the process of rural revitalization, and improving rural revitalization policies. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of rural revitalization including 5 primary indicators and 25 secondary indicators from the perspective of agricultural multifunction, and evaluates the rural revitalization level of 14 cities and counties in Hunan in 2016 by using analytic hierarchy process. The results show that: 1) There are significant regional differences in the level of rural revitalization in Hunan. Changsha has the highest level, reaching 0.915, and Zhangjiajie has the lowest level, which is 0.635; From the regional point of view, the northern part of Hunan is the highest, followed by Xiangdong,Xiangnan, Xiangzhong and Xiangxi. 2) In areas with high levels of rural revitalization, industries are prosperous,ecologically livable, and generally have a high degree of affluence. Among them, industrial prosperity plays a key role,but rural economic development does not necessarily bring about rural civilization and effective governance. Hunan rural revitalization should focus on promoting agriculture with "special" and accelerating the integration and development of rural industries, building ecological and livable beautiful villages, promoting the construction of rural civilization with rural cultural construction, promoting the modernization of rural governance system and governance ability, and improving the effective supply of rural public services and farmers income.
引文
[1]陈秧分,黄修杰,王丽娟.多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):201-209.
[2]陈锡文.从农村改革四十年看乡村振兴战略的提出[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):4-10.
[3]张军.乡村价值定位与乡村振兴[J].中国农村经济,2018(1):2-10
[4]黄祖辉.准确把握中国乡村振兴战略[J].中国农村经济,2018(4):2-12.
[5]曾福生,蔡保忠.以产业兴旺促湖南乡村振兴战略的实现[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(2):179-184.
[6]钟钰.实施乡村振兴战略的科学内涵与实现路径[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(5):71-76,2.
[7]刘合光.乡村振兴战略的关键点、发展路径与风险规避[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(3):25-33.
[8]邢成举,罗重谱.乡村振兴:历史源流、当下讨论与实施路径——基于相关文献的综述[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(5):8-17.
[9]柳思维,熊曦.大湘西农林生态特色产品品牌培育研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,12(1):1-6.
[10]熊小林.聚集乡村振兴战略探究农业农村现代化方略—“乡村振兴战略研讨会”会议综述[J].中国农村经济,2018(1):138-143.
[11]马义华,曾洪萍.推进乡村振兴的科学内涵和战略重点[J].农村经济,2018(6):11-16.
[12]刘润秋,黄志兵.实施乡村振兴战略的现实困境、政策误区及改革路径.农村经济[J].农村经济,2018(6):6-10.
[13]中共中央国务院关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见[J].理论参考,2018(4):4-15.
[14]韩长赋.实施乡村振兴战略推动农业农村优先发展[N].人民日报,2018-08-27(007).
[15]柳治国.湖南现代农业发展模式的现状及对策[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(1):58-61.
[2]陈锡文.从农村改革四十年看乡村振兴战略的提出[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):4-10.
[3]张军.乡村价值定位与乡村振兴[J].中国农村经济,2018(1):2-10
[4]黄祖辉.准确把握中国乡村振兴战略[J].中国农村经济,2018(4):2-12.
[5]曾福生,蔡保忠.以产业兴旺促湖南乡村振兴战略的实现[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(2):179-184.
[6]钟钰.实施乡村振兴战略的科学内涵与实现路径[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(5):71-76,2.
[7]刘合光.乡村振兴战略的关键点、发展路径与风险规避[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(3):25-33.
[8]邢成举,罗重谱.乡村振兴:历史源流、当下讨论与实施路径——基于相关文献的综述[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(5):8-17.
[9]柳思维,熊曦.大湘西农林生态特色产品品牌培育研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,12(1):1-6.
[10]熊小林.聚集乡村振兴战略探究农业农村现代化方略—“乡村振兴战略研讨会”会议综述[J].中国农村经济,2018(1):138-143.
[11]马义华,曾洪萍.推进乡村振兴的科学内涵和战略重点[J].农村经济,2018(6):11-16.
[12]刘润秋,黄志兵.实施乡村振兴战略的现实困境、政策误区及改革路径.农村经济[J].农村经济,2018(6):6-10.
[13]中共中央国务院关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见[J].理论参考,2018(4):4-15.
[14]韩长赋.实施乡村振兴战略推动农业农村优先发展[N].人民日报,2018-08-27(007).
[15]柳治国.湖南现代农业发展模式的现状及对策[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(1):58-61.