预见性护理在急性胃穿孔患者单纯修补术术后护理中的应用
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Application of predictive nursing in postoperative nursing of patients with acute gastric perforation after simple closure operation
  • 作者:何玲
  • 英文作者:HE Ling;
  • 关键词:急性胃穿孔 ; 预见性护理 ; 胃穿孔修补手术
  • 英文关键词:Acute gastric perforation;;Predictive care;;Gastric perforation repair operation
  • 中文刊名:HLSJ
  • 英文刊名:Nursing Practice and Research
  • 机构:盐城市第三人民医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-05
  • 出版单位:护理实践与研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.16
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HLSJ201901045
  • 页数:2
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:13-1352/R
  • 分类号:105-106
摘要
目的探讨预见性护理在急性胃穿孔患者单纯修补手术术后护理中的应用。方法选取2014年1月至2018年1月我院收治的94例急性胃穿孔患者为研究对象,随机将其等分为观察组和对照组,对照组患者在单纯修补手术后给予常规护理,研究组患者在进行单纯修补手术后给予预见性护理。比较两组患者单纯修补术后护理效果和不同时间段疼痛评分。结果研究组急性胃穿孔患者的护理效果显著优于对照组(P <0. 05);疼痛评分明显低于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论预见性护理应用于急性胃穿孔患者单纯修补手术后,可提高患者的护理效果,减轻患者不同时间段的疼痛,值得临床进一步推广应用。
        Objective To explore the application of predictive nursing in postoperative nursing of patients with acute gastric perforation after simple closure operation. Methods To select 94 cases of patients with acute gastric perforation admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2018 as the study subjects,and they were divided into observation group and control group with the same number of patients randomly. The control group was given routine nursing after simple closure operation. The patient in the study group were treated with predictive nursing after simple closure operation. The nesting effect and pain scores of patients in the two groups after the simple closure operation were compared. Results The nursing effect of patients with acute gastric perforation in the study group was significantly better than that of the control group( P < 0. 05). The pain score in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Predictive nursing can improve the nursing effect of patients with acute gastric perforation after simple closure operation. In addition,it can reduce the pain of patients in different time periods. It's worthy of wide clinical popularization and application.
引文
[1]周田华,夏芳,王晓明.单纯修补术与胃大部切除术在急性胃穿孔治疗中的应用对比[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(7):890-891.
    [2]余海涛,王艳.急性胃穿孔患者采用胃大部分切除术和单纯修补术治疗对其临床观察指标以及并发症的影响[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(27):73-74.
    [3]刘琳,蔡学菊.基于快速康复外科理念的个体化护理在腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(23):43-45.
    [4]方剑波,孙文,李军,等.单纯修补术与胃大部切除术在急性胃穿孔治疗中的应用价值观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(24):40-40.
    [5]顾志祥.单纯修补术与胃大部分切除术在急性胃穿孔治疗中的应用价值[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(8):119-120.
    [6]王长全.使用单纯修补术和胃大部分切除术治疗急性胃穿孔的疗效对比[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(6):168-169.
    [7]杨军.胃大部分切除术与单纯修补术治疗急性胃穿孔的方法及效果比较[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(10):51-52.
    [8]黄忠诚.胃大部分切除术与单纯修补术治疗急性胃十二指肠穿孔的疗效探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(1):100-101.
    [9]唐涛,王自芳.急性胃穿孔治疗中单纯修补术与胃大部分切除术的应用效果对比[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(30):74-76.
    [10]梁廷全.单纯修补术联合术后药物治疗急性胃穿孔的临床分析[J].中国处方药,2017,15(7):135-136.
    [11]李宗江.单纯胃穿孔修补术与胃大部分切除手术在胃穿孔患者中的应用比较[J].医学信息,2016,29(3):106-107.