现代语文教学知识建构的逻辑学参与——以夏丏尊为中心的考察
|
摘要
在近代中国教育转型过程中,教育界有识之士认识到普及逻辑学知识对培养现代国民的重要意义。1920年代初期,夏丏尊通过借鉴日本论理学研究的成果,努力探索一条将逻辑知识寓于中学现代语文教学的独特路径,在实现逻辑知识更大范围普及的同时,也进一步完善了语文知识体系。1930年代,夏丏尊在中学语文教科书的编写过程中,于形式逻辑之外,又补充了辩证逻辑的内容,并针对逻辑学和语文的关系,提出了逻辑知识应用以情境为要的总体要求。
In the process of educational transformation in modern China,people of insight in educational circles realized the importance of popularizing logic knowledge for training modern citizens. In the early 1920 s,Xia Mianzun tried to explore a unique way to integrate logic knowledge into modern Chinese teaching in middle schools by drawing on the achievements of Japanese theoretical research.It not only enriched the knowledge of modern Chinese teaching,but also realized the wider popularization of logic knowledge. In 1930 s,Xia Mianzun supplemented dialectical logic in the compilation of middle school chinese textbooks. In view of the relationship between logic and Chinese,he finally put forward the general regulation that context should come first.
In the process of educational transformation in modern China,people of insight in educational circles realized the importance of popularizing logic knowledge for training modern citizens. In the early 1920 s,Xia Mianzun tried to explore a unique way to integrate logic knowledge into modern Chinese teaching in middle schools by drawing on the achievements of Japanese theoretical research.It not only enriched the knowledge of modern Chinese teaching,but also realized the wider popularization of logic knowledge. In 1930 s,Xia Mianzun supplemented dialectical logic in the compilation of middle school chinese textbooks. In view of the relationship between logic and Chinese,he finally put forward the general regulation that context should come first.
引文
[1]严复.与外交报主人论教育书[C]//爱颖.国闻报汇编(下卷).上海:广雅书局,1903:37-41.
[2]陈元晖,璩鑫圭,唐良炎.中国近代教育史资料汇编·学制演变[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007:247-248.
[3]夏宇众.中学国文科教授之商榷[J].北京高师教育丛刊,1920(3):154-157.
[4]蔡元培.《中学国文科教授之商榷》序[C]//高平叔.蔡元培全集(第三卷)(1917—1920).北京:中华书局,1984:176.
[5]何仲英.中等学生的国语国文学习法[J].学生杂志,1923(6):73-97.
[6]陈元晖,李桂林,戚名琇,等.中国近代教育史资料汇编·普通教育[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007:727.
[7]中桐确太郎.早稻田大学三十九年度政治经济科第一学年讲义录·论理学[M].东京:早稻田大学出版部,1906.
[8]刘正伟,王荣辰.夏丏尊与现代语文教学理论的建构[J].课程·教材·教法,2019(1):137-143.
[9]仲九.对于中等学校国文教授的意见[J].教育潮,1919(5):43-47.
[10]陈望道.作文法讲义[M]//陈望道.陈望道全集(第4卷).杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011:45-46,46.
[11]孙俍工.论说文作法讲义[M].上海:商务印书馆,1924:110,119.
[12]夏丐尊,刘薰宇.文章作法[M].北京:中华书局,2007:71.
[13]梁启超.中学以上作文教学法[M].北京:中华书局,1925:33-34.
[14]高级中学普通科国文暂行课程标准[C]//课程教材研究所.20世纪中国中小学课程标准·教学大纲汇编(语文卷).北京:人民教育出版社.2001:288,294.
[15]夏丏尊,叶绍钧,宋云彬,等.开明国文讲义(第1册)[M].上海:开明书店,1934:209.
[16]夏丏尊,叶绍钧.国文百八课(第4册)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985:162.
[17]丏尊.句读和段落[J].中学生,1935(57):61-68.
[2]陈元晖,璩鑫圭,唐良炎.中国近代教育史资料汇编·学制演变[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007:247-248.
[3]夏宇众.中学国文科教授之商榷[J].北京高师教育丛刊,1920(3):154-157.
[4]蔡元培.《中学国文科教授之商榷》序[C]//高平叔.蔡元培全集(第三卷)(1917—1920).北京:中华书局,1984:176.
[5]何仲英.中等学生的国语国文学习法[J].学生杂志,1923(6):73-97.
[6]陈元晖,李桂林,戚名琇,等.中国近代教育史资料汇编·普通教育[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007:727.
[7]中桐确太郎.早稻田大学三十九年度政治经济科第一学年讲义录·论理学[M].东京:早稻田大学出版部,1906.
[8]刘正伟,王荣辰.夏丏尊与现代语文教学理论的建构[J].课程·教材·教法,2019(1):137-143.
[9]仲九.对于中等学校国文教授的意见[J].教育潮,1919(5):43-47.
[10]陈望道.作文法讲义[M]//陈望道.陈望道全集(第4卷).杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011:45-46,46.
[11]孙俍工.论说文作法讲义[M].上海:商务印书馆,1924:110,119.
[12]夏丐尊,刘薰宇.文章作法[M].北京:中华书局,2007:71.
[13]梁启超.中学以上作文教学法[M].北京:中华书局,1925:33-34.
[14]高级中学普通科国文暂行课程标准[C]//课程教材研究所.20世纪中国中小学课程标准·教学大纲汇编(语文卷).北京:人民教育出版社.2001:288,294.
[15]夏丏尊,叶绍钧,宋云彬,等.开明国文讲义(第1册)[M].上海:开明书店,1934:209.
[16]夏丏尊,叶绍钧.国文百八课(第4册)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985:162.
[17]丏尊.句读和段落[J].中学生,1935(57):61-68.