单向倒刺线与传统缝线在腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合术中应用比较的Meta分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Unidirectional barbed suture versus traditional suture for laparoscopic primary choledochal closure: a Meta-analysis
  • 作者:何攀 ; 赖莉 ; 苏松 ; 张孟瑜 ; 贺凯 ; 李波 ; 夏先明
  • 英文作者:HE Pan;LAI Li;SU Song;ZHANG Mengyu;HE Kai;LI Bo;XIA Xianming;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery , the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University;Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University;
  • 关键词:胆总管探查术 ; 缝合技术 ; 腹腔镜 ; 缝线 ; Meta分析
  • 英文关键词:Common Bile Duct Exploration;;Suture Techniques;;Laparoscopes;;Sutures;;Meta-Analysis
  • 中文刊名:ZPWZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of General Surgery
  • 机构:西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科;西南医科大学附属医院麻醉科;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:中国普通外科杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.28
  • 基金:四川省科学技术厅联合科研专项资金计划资助项目(Z1428)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZPWZ201902003
  • 页数:11
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:43-1213/R
  • 分类号:22-32
摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜胆道探查术后胆总管一期缝合术中采用单向倒刺线(UBS)与传统缝线(TS)的临床效果。方法:检索中英文数据库中比较UBS与TS在腹腔镜胆道探查胆总管一期缝合术中应用的临床研究,检索时间最后为2018年9月。在对纳入研究进行方法学质量评价和数据提取后,采用RevMan5.1和STATA12.0软件行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入10个研究,包括3个随机对照研究(RCT)和7个观察性研究,共848例患者。整体分析显示,与TS组比较,UBS组胆管缝合时间(WMD=-11.38,95%CI=-14.81~-7.94,P<0.001),手术时间(WMD=-20.55,95%CI=-30.63~-10.46,P<0.001)和住院时间(WMD=-0.78,95%CI=-1.47~-0.09,P<0.05)均明显缩短,术后胆汁漏发生率明显降低(RR=0.23,95%CI=0.10~0.55,P<0.001)。基于研究设计的亚组分析结果显示,两组除住院时间在RCT研究中无统计学差异(WMD=-0.06,95%CI=-0.61~0.49,P=0.83),其余均与整体分析结果一致。结论:UBS不仅为腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合提供了一个新途径,且安全可行。未来还需要更多的多中心大样本随机对照试验来予以验证。
        Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of using unidirectional barbed suture(UBS) and traditional suture(TS) in primary closure of the common bile duct following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE). Methods: The clinical studies comparing using UBS and TS in LCBDE with primary choledochal closure published in English and Chinese were searched through online databases. The retrieval time was up to September 2018. After the quality evaluation and data extraction of the included studies, Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 and STATA 12.0 software.Results: Ten studies were finally included with three randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and seven observational studies, involving a total of 848 patients. The results of overall analysis showed that the time for bile duct suturing(WMD=–11.38, 95% CI=–14.81––7.94, P<0.001), operative time(WMD=–20.55, 95% CI= –30.63––10.46, P<0.001) and length of hospital stay(WMD=–0.78, 95% CI=–1.47––0.09, P<0.05) were all shortened, and the incidence of bile leakage(RR=0.23, 95% CI=0.10–0.55, P<0.001) was decreased significantly in UBS group compared with TS group. The results of subgroup analyses based on study design showed that except the length of hospital stays had no statistical difference between the two groups(WMD=–0.06, 95% CI=–0.61–0.49, P=0.83), all the others were consistent with the results of overall analysis. Conclusion: UBS not only provides a new approach for laparoscopic primary choledochal closure, but also is feasible and safe. However, this conclusion still needs to be verified by more multicenter and well-designed randomized controlled trials.
引文
[1]Grubnik VV,Tkachenko AI,Ilyashenko VV,et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery:comparative prospective randomized trial[J].Surg Endosc,2012,26(8):2165-2171.doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2194-7.
    [2]Halawani HM,Tamim H,Khalifeh F,et al.Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Common Bile Duct Exploration:Analysis of the NSQIP Database[J].J Am Coll Surg,2017,224(5):833-840.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.062.
    [3]Khanzada Z,Morgan R.A laparoscopic approach to CBD stones[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2013,23(6):502-506.doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e318290144b.
    [4]Podda M,Polignano FM,Luhmann A,et al.Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(3):845-861.doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4303-x.
    [5]Parra-Membrives P,Martínez-Baena D,Lorente-Herce J,et al.Comparative Study of Three Bile Duct Closure Methods Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis[J]J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2018,28(2):145-151.doi:10.1089/lap.2017.0433.
    [6]Hanna GB,Frank TG,Cuschieri A.Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality[J].Am J Surg,1997,174(4):410-413.
    [7]De Blasi V,Facy O,Goergen M,et al.Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass:a comparative trial[J].Obes Surg,2013,23(1):60-63.doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0763-4.
    [8]Angioli R,Plotti F,Montera R,et al.A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2012,117(3):220-223.doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.12.023.
    [9]Matsuhashi N,Takahashi T,Nonaka K,et al.Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection[J].World J Surg Oncol,2013,27(11):115.doi:10.1186/1477-7819-11-115.
    [10]Jeon SH,Jung S,Son HS,et al.The unidirectional barbed suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:Stanford experience[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2013,23(6):521-525.doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0405.
    [11]吴鹏,方路,付小伟,等.单向倒刺线与普通可吸收线在腹腔镜下胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中应用的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(9):52-56.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.09.012.Wu P,Fang L,Fu XW,et al.Comparison of one-way barbs line and normal line in primary suturing of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy[J].China Journal of Endoscopy,2016,22(9):52-56.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.09.012.
    [12]F e r n a n d e z L C,To r i z A,H e r n a n d e z J,e t a l.K n o t l e s s choledochorraphy with barbed suture,safe and feasible[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(8):3630-3635.doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4620-0.
    [13]Wells GA,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www,ohri.ca/programs/clin-ical_epidemiology/nos_manual,pdf.
    [14]肖宏,孙科,田刚,等.腹腔镜下倒刺缝线与可吸收缝线缝合胆总管切口的效果比较研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(6):40-43.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.06.011.Xiao H,Sun K,Tian G,et al.Comparison of unidirectional barbed suture and traditional suture for closing choledoch incision[J].China Journal of Endoscopy,2016,22(6):40-43.
    [15]刘传磊,法镇中,奚剑波,等.单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中的应用研究[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2018,30(4):279-282.doi:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.04.004.Liu CL,Fa ZZ,Xi JB,et al.The application of single needle barbed suture in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J].Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,2018,30(4):279-282.doi:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.04.004.
    [16]陶杰,张东,白纪刚,等.单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管探查一期连续缝合中的应用[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2018,30(3):197-201.doi:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.03.005.Tao J,Zhang D,Bai JG,et al.Application of unidirectional barbed suture in primary continuous closure of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J].Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,2018,30(3):197-201.doi:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.03.005.
    [17]王江华,吴黎明,刘小波,等.Quill免打结缝合线与薇乔线在腹腔镜下胆总管连续缝合的应用比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):503-505.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2014.06.007.Wang JH,Wu LM,Liu XB,et al.Quill Versus Vicryl Suturing in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014,14(6):503-505.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2014.06.007.
    [18]段键,夏仁品,林杰,等.单向倒刺线在腹腔镜肝叶切除联合术中胆道探查中的运用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2016,25(2):186-190.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2016.02.005.Duan J,Xia RP,Lin J,et al.Application of unidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic hepatectomy with bile duct exploration[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2016,25(2):186-190.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2016.02.005.
    [19]李作安,秦呈林,张建民,等.单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合治疗肝外胆管结石[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(9):1228-1230.doi:10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2017.09.023.Li ZA,Qin CL,Zhang JM,et al.Application of unidirectional barbed suture in primary closure of the common bile duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for extrahepatic bile duct stones[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Research,2017,30(9):1228-1230.doi:10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2017.09.023.
    [20]熊日晖.倒刺线连续缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆总管切开取石胆总管Ⅰ期缝合术中的应用体会[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(35):17-18.doi:10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2017.35.009.Xiong RH.The experience of applying continuous barbs suture into choledocholithotomy with the combining of using laparoscopy and choledochoscopy in the first-stage suture in common bile duct[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use,2017,10(35):17-18.doi:10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2017.35.009.
    [21]段键,杨世昆,夏仁品,等.单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆道探查胆总管一期缝合术中的对照研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(4):478-479.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.04.015.Duan J,Yang SK,Xia RP,et al.A comparative study on primary closure of common bile duct using barbed suture after laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct stones[J].Chongqing Medical Journal,2017,46(4):478-479.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.04.015.
    [22]Liu X,Luo D,Chen H,et al.Application of Barbed Sutures in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration:A Retrospective Analysis[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2018,28(5):324-327.doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000566.
    [23]Ahmed I,Pradhan C,Beckingham IJ,et al.Is a T-tube necessary after common bile duct exploration?[J].World J Surg,2008,32(7):1485-1488.doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9475-2.
    [24]别平,杨智清.不断提高肝胆管结石的诊治规范化[J].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(6):451-453.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2016.06.001.Bie P,Yang ZQ.Continuous improvement of standardization in the diagnosis and treatment of Hepatolithiasis[J].Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery:Electronic Version,2016,10(6):451-453.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2016.06.001.
    [25]张淼,谈永飞.腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查术与胆总管探查并一期缝合术治疗胆总管结石的对比研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(2):151-156.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2017.02.004.Zhang M,Tan YF.Comparison of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary suture for common bile duct stones[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2017,26(2):151-156.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2017.02.004.
    [26]陈章彬,陈见中,滕毅山.经皮经肝穿刺胆道引流术在腹腔镜下胆道探查术后一期缝合中的应用价值[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(2):156-162.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.02.004.Chen ZB,Chen JZ,Teng YS.Application value of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure[J].Chinese Journal o f G e n e r a l S u rg e r y,2018,27(2):156-162.d o i:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.02.004.
    [27]梁阔,刘东斌,刘家峰,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合治疗老年胆总管结石的临床疗效分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(8):1030-1035.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2017.08.011.Liang K,Liu DB,Liu JF,et al.Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for choledocholithiasis in elderly patients[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2017,26(8):1030-1035.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2017.08.011.
    [28]温顺前,谢学弈,巫青,等.腹腔镜下胆总管探查取石术后胆总管一期缝合的疗效分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(2):163-168.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.02.005.Wen SQ,Xie XY,Wu Q,et al.Efficacy analysis of primary closure of common bile duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2018,27(2):163-168.doi:10.3978/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.02.005.
    [29]林广荣,徐志杰,陈维荣,等.单向倒刺可吸收缝线在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J].中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2017,11(6):418-421.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.06.014.Lin GR,Xu ZZ,Chen WR,et al.Application of unidirectional barbed suture in transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic[J].Chinese Archives of General Surgery:Electronic Edition,2017,11(6):418-421.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.06.014.
    [30]Sammon J,Kim TK,Trinh QD,et al.Anastomosis during robotassisted radical prostatectomy:randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture[J].Urology,2011,78(3):572-579.doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.069.
    [31]Alessandri F,Remorgida V,Venturini PL,et al.Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy:a randomized study[J].JMinim Invasive Gynecol,2010,17(6):725-729.doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.007.
    [32]Demyttenaere SV,Nau P,Henn M,et al.Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure:a randomized control trial[J].Surg Innov,2009,16(3):237-242.doi:10.1177/1553350609342988.
    [33]Lee JS,Yoon YC.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(6):2530-2534.doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4518-x.
    [34]Yokoyama K,Tanigawa N,Ogata A.Laparoscopic Technique and Initial Experiences of Choledocholithotomy Closure With Knotless Unidirectional Barbed Sutures After Surgery for Biliary Stone Disease[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2015,25(4):e129-133.doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000122.
    [35]Shrier I,Boivin JF,Steele RJ,et al.Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials?A critical examination of underlying principles[J].Am J Epidemiol,2007,166(10):1203-1209.doi:10.1093/aje/kwm189.
    [36]Kunz R,Oxman AD.The unpredictability paradox:review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials[J].BMJ,1998,317(7167):1185-1190.