农地确权内涵体系的逻辑结构及其三维检视
|
摘要
研究目的:研究农地确权内涵体系的逻辑结构,并将该逻辑结构含有的三个逻辑层次转换为三个研究维度,展开延伸并检视。研究方法:系统研究法、结构分析法、实证研究法。研究结果:农地确权内涵体系的逻辑结构至少有三个逻辑层次,即产权性质确认、产权框架或三权分置式确认、产权核心或农户承包权确认。农地确权清晰化的进路,本质上是农地确权理念的共识达成和农地确权关系的均衡达成。研究结论:农地确权应做到"三协同、一转化",即协同推进农地产权功能治理市场化,协同推进农地"三权分置"可操作化,协同推进农地确权的技术标准、测量规范和数据管理科学化,以及促进承包地的实物调整向权益调整转化。
The purpose of the paper is to study the logical structure of the connotation system of farmland property right registration, to transform the three logical levels contained in this logical structure into three research dimensions and to make the corresponding investigation. The research methods employed include systematic research, structural analysis and empirical research. The results show that there are at least three logical levels in the logical structure of the connotation system of farmland property right registration, that is, the recognition of property right nature, the framework of property right or the identification of three rights, the core of property rights or the confirmation of farmers' contractual rights. The approach to the clarity of the rights of farmland is in essence, the consensus on the concept of farmland property right registration and the balance of the relationship among the rights of farmland. In conclusion, "Three synergy, One transformation" should be enforced, that is, the coordinated promotion of farmland property right function governance marketization as well as the synergic implementation of tripartite entitlement system of farmland, the coordination of technical standards, measurement standards and data management regarding farmland property right registration as well as the transformation of contractual rights to farmland from the physical adjustment to the interest adjustment.
The purpose of the paper is to study the logical structure of the connotation system of farmland property right registration, to transform the three logical levels contained in this logical structure into three research dimensions and to make the corresponding investigation. The research methods employed include systematic research, structural analysis and empirical research. The results show that there are at least three logical levels in the logical structure of the connotation system of farmland property right registration, that is, the recognition of property right nature, the framework of property right or the identification of three rights, the core of property rights or the confirmation of farmers' contractual rights. The approach to the clarity of the rights of farmland is in essence, the consensus on the concept of farmland property right registration and the balance of the relationship among the rights of farmland. In conclusion, "Three synergy, One transformation" should be enforced, that is, the coordinated promotion of farmland property right function governance marketization as well as the synergic implementation of tripartite entitlement system of farmland, the coordination of technical standards, measurement standards and data management regarding farmland property right registration as well as the transformation of contractual rights to farmland from the physical adjustment to the interest adjustment.
引文
[1]严小龙.农村承包地“三权”分置研究述评[J].湖南社会科学,2018(3):79-85.
[2]刘守英.善待农民地权是农地三权分置的前提[N].光明日报,2017-02-14(3).
[3]朱广新.土地承包权与经营权分离的政策意蕴与法制完善[J].法学,2015(11):88-100.
[4]高飞.论集体土地所有权主体立法的价值目标与功能定位[J].中外法学,2009,21(6):851-866.
[5]孙宪忠.中国农村土地权利制度研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:540.
[6]黄韬.中国农地集体产权制度研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2010:76.
[7]王利明,周友军.论我国农村土地权利制度的完善[J].中国法学,2012(1):45-54.
[8]冯建生.民法典编纂中农村承包土地“三权分置”的法理构造[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,26(3):21-32.
[9]陈小君.我国农村土地法律制度变革的思路与框架——十八届三中全会《决定》相关内容解读[J].法学研究,2014,36(4):4-25.
[10]丁文.论土地承包权与土地承包经营权的分离[J].中国法学,2015(3):159-178.
[11]张守夫,张少停.“三权分置”下农村土地承包权制度改革的战略思考[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(2):9-15.
[12]李伟伟,张云华.土地经营权流转的根本属性与权能演变[J].改革,2015(7):91-97.
[13]单平基.“三权分置”中土地经营权债权定性的证成[J].法学,2018(10):37-51.
[14]蔡立东,姜楠.农地三权分置的法实现[J].中国社会科学,2017(5):102-122,207.
[15]杨一介.论“三权分置”背景下的家庭承包经营制度[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):82-95.
[16]肖鹏.“三权分置”下的农村土地权利结构研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):24-29.
[17]马俊驹,丁晓强.农村集体土地所有权的分解与保留——论农地“三权分置”的法律构造[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(3):141-150.
[18]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[19]严小龙.农地确权理路与“三确三跟”路线——基于对湖南、河南、贵州、安徽、江苏、广东等省份农村的访谈调研[J].湖南社会科学,2019(1):59-66.
(1)刘振伟.《关于〈中华人民共和国农村土地承包法修正案〉(草案)的说明》[R]. 2017年10月31日在第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议上的报告。
(1)引自湖南师范大学公共管理学院陈婧副教授的观点。
[2]刘守英.善待农民地权是农地三权分置的前提[N].光明日报,2017-02-14(3).
[3]朱广新.土地承包权与经营权分离的政策意蕴与法制完善[J].法学,2015(11):88-100.
[4]高飞.论集体土地所有权主体立法的价值目标与功能定位[J].中外法学,2009,21(6):851-866.
[5]孙宪忠.中国农村土地权利制度研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:540.
[6]黄韬.中国农地集体产权制度研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2010:76.
[7]王利明,周友军.论我国农村土地权利制度的完善[J].中国法学,2012(1):45-54.
[8]冯建生.民法典编纂中农村承包土地“三权分置”的法理构造[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,26(3):21-32.
[9]陈小君.我国农村土地法律制度变革的思路与框架——十八届三中全会《决定》相关内容解读[J].法学研究,2014,36(4):4-25.
[10]丁文.论土地承包权与土地承包经营权的分离[J].中国法学,2015(3):159-178.
[11]张守夫,张少停.“三权分置”下农村土地承包权制度改革的战略思考[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(2):9-15.
[12]李伟伟,张云华.土地经营权流转的根本属性与权能演变[J].改革,2015(7):91-97.
[13]单平基.“三权分置”中土地经营权债权定性的证成[J].法学,2018(10):37-51.
[14]蔡立东,姜楠.农地三权分置的法实现[J].中国社会科学,2017(5):102-122,207.
[15]杨一介.论“三权分置”背景下的家庭承包经营制度[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):82-95.
[16]肖鹏.“三权分置”下的农村土地权利结构研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):24-29.
[17]马俊驹,丁晓强.农村集体土地所有权的分解与保留——论农地“三权分置”的法律构造[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(3):141-150.
[18]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[19]严小龙.农地确权理路与“三确三跟”路线——基于对湖南、河南、贵州、安徽、江苏、广东等省份农村的访谈调研[J].湖南社会科学,2019(1):59-66.
(1)刘振伟.《关于〈中华人民共和国农村土地承包法修正案〉(草案)的说明》[R]. 2017年10月31日在第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议上的报告。
(1)引自湖南师范大学公共管理学院陈婧副教授的观点。