摘要
[目的/意义]研究专利内容新颖性和常规性与突破性发明之间的关系,为提升专利影响力,获得更多突破性发明提供新视角。[方法/过程]以发明过程和探索/利用理论为依据,使用文本挖掘方法抽取专利的标题和摘要,构建专利知识网络并设计专利内容新颖性和常规性指标,并运用负二项回归模型研究它们与突破性发明之间的关系。[结果/结论]回归结果表明,专利内容新颖性、常规性及其交互作用都会对突破性发明产生正向影响。在此基础上对发明主体的类型进行划分,针对性地提出取得突破性发明的研发管理建议。
of patents, design indicators of novelty and conventionality of patent's content by constructing patent knowledge network. Then the relationship between indicators and breakthrough inventions is studied using the negative binomial regression model.[Result/Conclusion]The results of regression show that novelty, conventionality and their interactions all positively impact breakthrough inventions. Based on these results, inventors are classified into four types, and R&D strategy for each type is formed accordingly.
引文
[1] 宋河发,穆荣平,陈芳,等.基于中国发明专利数据的专利质量测度研究 [J].科研管理,2014,35(11): 68-76.
[2] Ahuja G,Lampert C M.Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6/7): 521-543.
[3] Jung H J,Lee J.The quest for originality: A new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions[J].Academy of Management Journal,2016,59(5): 1725-1753.
[4] Bakker J,Verhoeven D,Zhang L,et al.Patent citation indicators: One size fits all?[J].Scientometrics,2016,106(1):187-211.
[5] Chihmao Hsieh.Explicitly searching for useful inventions:Dynamic relatedness and the costs of connecting versus synthesizing[J].Scientometrics,2011,86(2):381-404.
[6] 吕璐成,刘娅,杨冠灿.基于决策树方法的专利被引影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(2):28-32.
[7] Breitzman A,Thomas P.Inventor team size as a predictor of the future citation impact of patents[J].Scientometrics,2015,103(2):1-17.
[8] Singh J,Fleming L.Loneinventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?[J].Management Science,2010,56(1):41-56.
[9] Lee Y N,Walsh J P,Wang J.Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact [J].Research Policy,2015,44(3):684-697.
[10] Schilling M A,Green E.Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences[J].Research Policy,2011,40(10):1321-1331.
[11] Mukherjee S,Uzzi B,Jones B,et al.Anew method for identifying recombinations of existing knowledge associated with high-impact innovation[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016,33(2):224-236.
[12] Kim D,Cerigo D B,Jeong H,et al.Technological novelty profile and invention's future impact[J].EPJ Data Science,2016,5(1):1-15.
[13] Kaplan S,Vakili K.The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(10):1435-1457.
[14] 任海英,王德营,王菲菲.主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J].图书情报工作,2017(9):87-93.
[15] Cohen S K,Caner T.Converting inventions into breakthrough innovations: The role of exploitation and alliance network knowledge heterogeneity[J].Journal of Engineering & Technology Management,2016,40(C):29-44.
[16] Enkel E,Heil S,Hengstler M,et al.Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute?[J].Technovation,2017,60-61: 29-38.
[17] Youn H,Strumsky D,Bettencourt L M A,et al.Invention as a combinatorial process:Evidence from US patents[J].Journal of the Royal Society Interface,2015,12(106).
[18] Chen C.Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2012,63(3):431-449.