京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区整体性治理的制度创新研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on the Institutional Innovation of Holistic Governance in Xiong'an New Area under the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Coordinated Development
  • 作者:赵新峰 ; 袁宗威
  • 英文作者:ZHAO Xinfeng;YUAN Zongwei;School of Management, Capital Normal University;Service Centre, National Publicity Cadres Academy;
  • 关键词:京津冀协同发展 ; 雄安新区 ; 整体性治理 ; 制度创新
  • 英文关键词:Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development;;Xiong'an New Area;;holistic governance;;institutional innovation
  • 中文刊名:XZNT
  • 英文刊名:Administrative Tribune
  • 机构:首都师范大学教育学院;全国宣传干部学院服务一处;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-06 16:29
  • 出版单位:行政论坛
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.26;No.153
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金“研究阐释党的十九大精神”专项项目“京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区整体性治理架构研究”(18VSJ066)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XZNT201903008
  • 页数:11
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:23-1360/D
  • 分类号:53-63
摘要
制度从本质上而言是一套协调行动的规则系统,制度安排是集体行动的逻辑起点。雄安新区的整体性治理架构需要建构在集体行动的基础上,对雄安新区的制度基础、制度生成、制度变迁、制度创新加以整体性建构至关重要。本文基于京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区现有制度安排框架,从制度创新的动因分析入手,在对整体性治理视域下雄安新区制度创新进行理论分析的基础上,从制度创新价值、制度创新文化、制度创新主体、新制度实施保障机制等四个方面探讨了推进雄安新区整体性治理制度创新的对策思路。
        Institution is a set of principles to coordinate actions, and the institutional arrangement is the logical start of collective actions. The framework of holistic governance of Xiong'an New Area should be built on collective actions, thus it is of great importance to holistically construct its institutional basis, formation, transition and innovation. Based on the current institutional framework of Xiong'an New Area under the background of BeijingTianjin-Hebei coordinated development, starting from the motivations of institutional innovation, this paper will discuss the institutional innovation countermeasures for promoting the holistic governance of Xiong'an New Area from the perspectives of value, culture, subjects and guaranteeing mechanisms based on the theoretical analysis of institutional innovation from the view of holistic governance.
引文
[1]道格拉斯·C.诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行,译.韦森,审校.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2008:105.
    [2]RUTTON V W. Induced Innovation:Technology, Innovation and Development[M]. Baltimore,MD:Johns Hopkins University Press,1978.
    [3]卢现祥,等.低碳经济与制度安排[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
    [4]王浦劬,臧雷震.治理理论与实践:经典议题研究新解[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2017:520.
    [5]MAY P J&A JOCHIM A E. Policy Regime Perspectives:Politicies,Politics, and Governing[J]. Policy Studies Journal,2013,41(3):426-452.
    [6]赵新峰,袁宗威.我国区域政府间大气污染协同治理的制度基础与安排[J].阅江学刊,2017,(2):5-14,144.
    [7]程恩富,胡乐明.新制度经济学[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2005:49-55.
    [8]张楠迪扬.京津冀一体化视角下的雄安新区行政体制机制创新[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(6):82-86,162.
    [9]彭锦鹏.全观型治理:理论与制度化策略[J].台湾政治科学论丛,2005,(23):61-100.
    [10]黄滔.整体性治理制度化策略研究[J].行政与法,2010,(2):2-4.
    [11]PERRI 6, LEAT D, SELTZER K,&STOCKER G. Towards Holistic Governance:the New Reform Agenda[M]. New York:Palgrave,2002:203.
    [12]赵新峰,王浦劬.京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区治理理念的变革与重塑[J].行政论坛,2018,(2):31-39.