手术治疗下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤的临床疗效观察
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Observation of Surgical Treatment of Ankle Joint Injury with Separation of Lower Tibiofibular Syndesmosis
  • 作者:于建辉
  • 英文作者:YU Jian-hui;Yantai Beihai Hospital;
  • 关键词:短肌腱移位手术 ; 骨膜移位手术 ; 下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤
  • 英文关键词:Short tendon transposition surgery;;Periosteal displacement surgery;;Ankle joint injury separated by lower tibiofibular syndesmosis
  • 中文刊名:ZHJK
  • 英文刊名:Smart Healthcare
  • 机构:山东省烟台市北海医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-05
  • 出版单位:智慧健康
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.5
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZHJK201913074
  • 页数:2
  • CN:13
  • ISSN:10-1365/TN
  • 分类号:172-173
摘要
目的观察分析对下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤患者在临床中行手术治疗的效果。方法选择于2017年5月至2019年4月到我院接受治疗的80例下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤患者,随机分为甲组(40例)与乙组(40例),甲组接受短肌腱移位手术治疗,乙组接受骨膜移位手术治疗,观察统计临床治疗效果以及手术相关指标情况,并对比分析。结果 (1)两组患者治疗效果比较:乙组临床治疗总有效率97.50%明显较甲组80.00%高,两组对比具有统计学差异(P<0.05);(2)两组患者恢复时间以及手术时间:组间对比患者恢复时间以及手术时间情况,结果显示乙组显著优于甲组,两组对比具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论对于下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤患者,对其行骨膜移位手术治疗,可缩短手术以及恢复时间,并提升整体疗效,在临床中值得推广。
        Objective To observe and analyze the effect of surgical treatment on ankle joint injury patients with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis separation. Methods Eighty patients with ankle joint injury separated by lower tibiofibular syndesmosis who were treated in our hospital from May 2017 to April 2019 were randomly divided into group A(40 cases) and group B(40 cases). Group A received short-range tendon transposition surgery, and group B received periosteal transposition surgery. The clinical and therapeutic effects and surgical related indicators were observed and compared. Results(1) Comparison of therapeutic effects between the two groups: the total effective rate of clinical treatment in group B was 97.50%, which was significantly higher than that in group A 80.00%(P<0.05);(2)The recovery time and operation time of the two groups were as follows: the recovery time and operative time of group comparison patients showed that group B was significantly better than group A(P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with ankle joint injury separated by lower tibiofibular syndesmosis, periosteal displacement surgery can shorten the operation and recovery time, and improve the overall efficacy, which is worthy of promotion in the clinic.
引文
[1]赵洪涛.锁定钢板联合拉力螺钉内固定治疗踝关节骨折合并下胫腓分离[J].中医正骨,2017,29(3):67-68.
    [2]徐刚,李小飞,史东平,等.动态与静态固定2种方式在治疗伴下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折中的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(4):372-375.
    [3]牟风云,胡章勇,刘陵.三种螺钉固定方式治疗下胫腓联合分离对踝关节功能影响的比较研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(10):777-780.
    [4]王永永,贾代良,张刚,等.两种固定方式治疗旋后外旋Ⅳ°踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合分离的疗效分析[J].济宁医学院学报,2017,40(1):28-31.
    [5]孙宝慧.手术治疗下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤患者的临床效果分析[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(10):58.
    [6]朱合宜.踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合分离的手术治疗及临床意义[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(1):142-143.
    [7]李林卫,陈晓辉.合并下胫腓联合损伤踝关节骨折的手术治疗[J].临床研究,2017,25(3):73-74.
    [8]宋建华,常宝生,武政.手术治疗下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤的临床效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(18):82-83.
    [9]宗双乐,苏立新,梁卫东,等.AO-B型踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合分离损伤嵌插占位的治疗[J].中国医师杂志,2017,19(4):599-601.
    [10]郭红军.手术治疗下胫腓联合分离踝关节损伤患者的临床效果分析[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(11):1501-1503.