中国公众参与对环境治理的影响——基于不同类型环境污染的视角
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Impact of Public Participation on Environmental Governance in China:Perspective Based on Different Types of Environmental Pollution
  • 作者:余亮
  • 英文作者:Yu Liang;Chinese Academy of Financial Sciences;
  • 关键词:公众参与 ; 环境治理 ; 环境污染
  • 英文关键词:public participation;;environmental governance;;environmental pollution
  • 中文刊名:JSJI
  • 英文刊名:Technology Economics
  • 机构:中国财政科学研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:技术经济
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.375
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JSJI201903012
  • 页数:8
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-1444/F
  • 分类号:100-107
摘要
基于2010—2016年中国省级面板数据,实证研究了公众参与对水环境治理、固体废弃物治理、大气环境治理和噪声环境治理的效果,以及在这四类环境污染下公众参与对政府环境规制的影响。研究发现:公众对不同类型环境污染的感受不同,导致公众在相应的环境污染治理中的参与程度也不同;公众对水环境、固体废弃物和噪声环境污染治理有着较高的参与度并取得了显著的治理效果,其原因在于上述类型环境污染对公众造成的直观感受较深,短期内对健康威胁较大;而公众对大气环境污染治理的参与效果不显著,其可能原因是公众对中轻度大气污染的直观感受不深刻,短期内健康未受到大气污染的明显影响;公众参与对我国政府环境规制的影响程度不高。
        Based on the provincial panel data of China from 2010 to 2016,this paper empirically studies the effects of public participation on water environment control,solid waste control,atmospheric environment control and noise environment control,and the impact of public participation on government environmental regulation under these four types of environmental pollution.It finds that the public's different perceptions of different types of environmental pollution led to different levels of public participation in the corresponding environmental pollution control;the public has a high degree of participation in the treatment of water environment,solid waste and noise pollution and achieved remarkable results.The reason is that the above types of environmental pollution have a significant impact on the public.The intuitive feeling is deeper and the health threat is bigger in the short run;while the public participation in the treatment of atmospheric environmental pollution is not significant,the possible reason is that the public intuitive feeling of moderate and mild air pollution is not deep,and the health is not obviously affected by air pollution in the short run;it also finds that the influence of public participation on the environmental regulation of our government is not high.
引文
[1]秦鹏,唐道鸿,田亦尧.环境治理公众参与的主体困境与制度回应[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2016,22(4):126-132.
    [2]郭红燕.我国环境保护公众参与现状、问题及对策[J].团结,2018(5):22-27.
    [3]邓江凌.环境保护公众参与问题研究[J].重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版),2018,37(6):87-95.
    [4]MILLS C W.The Power Elite[M].New York:Oxford U-niversity Press,1959.
    [5]SCOTT W R.Organization-rational,Natural and Open System[M].New Jersey:Prentice-Hall,INC.Englewood Cliffs,1981.
    [6]KATHURIA V.Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country:evidence from India[J].Ecological Economics,2007,63(2-3):403-417.
    [7]LANGPAP C,SHIMSHACK J P.Private citizen suits and public enforcement:substitutes or complements?[J].Journal of Environmental Economics&Management,2010,59(3):235-249.
    [8]FéRES J,REYNAUD A.Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms[J].Environmental&Resource Economics,2012,52(1):65-85.
    [9]COLE M A,ELLIOTT R J R,SHIMAMOTO K.Industrial characteristics,environmental regulations and air pollution:an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector[J].Journal of Environmental Economics&Management,2005,50(1):121-143.
    [10]王树义,蔡文灿.论我国环境治理的权力结构[J].法制与社会发展,2016(3):155-166.
    [11]王红梅,刘红岩.我国环境治理公众参与:模型构建与实践应用[J].求是学刊,2016,43(4):65-71.
    [12]涂正革,邓辉,甘天琦.公众参与中国环境治理的逻辑:理论、实践和模式[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,57(3):49-61.
    [13]汪泽波,王鸿雁.多中心治理理论视角下京津冀区域环境协同治理探析[J].生态经济,2016,32(6):157-163.
    [14]郑思齐,万广华,孙伟增,等.公众诉求与城市环境治理[J].管理世界,2013(6):72-84.
    [15]李子豪.公众参与对地方政府环境治理的影响---2003-2013年省际数据的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2017(8):102-108.
    [16]张艳纯,陈安琪.公众参与和环境规制对环境治理的影响---基于省级面板数据的分析[J].城市问题,2018(1):74-80.
    [17]张橦.新媒体视域下公众参与环境治理的效果研究---基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2018(9):79-85.
    [18]闫文娟,钟茂初.中国式财政分权会增加环境污染吗[J].财经论丛,2012(3):32-37.
    [19]张彩云,郭艳青.中国式财政分权、公众参与和环境规制---基于1997-2011年中国30个省份的实证研究[J].南京审计学院学报,2015(6):13-23.
    [20]韩超,张伟广,单双.规制治理、公众诉求与环境污染---基于地区间环境治理策略互动的经验分析[J].财贸经济,2016,37(9):144-161.