摘要
基础教育阶段的根本任务就是无论学生之间的差异有多大,无论学生是否升学有望,都不存在该不该培养和能不能培养的问题,而只是如何培养的问题。让每一个学生的潜能都得到最充分的发现和发展,让每一个学生都具有自我发展的能力,是目前基础教育课程改革的目标,这也正是素质教育的理念。
学生评价是对学生学习进展与行为变化的评价,是学校教育评价的核心。“为了每位学生的全面发展”的承诺,就必须改革现行的学生评价体系。本课题提出了“区分性学生评价”,并针对于评价方式与目前较为普遍运用的评价方式做一比较,真正体现出“无差生”。
传统评价一般采用的方式是考试,即仅凭单一、狭隘的智力测验,把学生鲜活的个性抽象成一组僵硬的数字的评价方式,缺乏与真实生活的相似性,扼杀了多数学生的发展潜能。区分性学生评价目的是依据学生自身的个性发展针对评价方案量体裁衣,不同的学生指定不同的方案,针对不同能力,类型的学生采用不同的评价卷子,得出成绩不可比,比的是进步指数。让每一个学生的潜能都得到最充分的发现和发展,把改进型学生转变成完美型学生。
本文首先介绍了区分性学生评价的研究背景、研究动机,以及学习者特征分析和具体评价量表的制定、最后在教学中的具体实施策略。
The basic assignment of Based Education of stage is that, the Teaching Evaluation is an important aspect in the Education Evaluation and it is the main part and foundation to constitute the Education Evaluation. According to the educational policy, certain teaching target and the teaching normal standards the Teaching Evaluation makes use of all the probable evaluation technique to judge the degree to carry out the teaching result and the teaching target etc. so as to improve the teaching work. The Teaching Evaluation is necessary in the teaching activity and constitutes the main part of it. The student's evaluation is an important aspect in the Teaching Evaluation. And this is the theory of quality-oriented education.
Student Assessment is the assessment of the learning progress and behavior changes of students, is the core of school education evaluation. To make the“all-round development of each students" come true, we must reform the existing student evaluation system. The research proposed a " Differentiated Students' Evaluation strategies," and focuses on the comparison of evaluation form and the more common use of the current evaluation method, really make "No less advanced students."
The test is the the traditional way of evaluation, that is just a single, narrow intelligence test, abstract the live personality of the students into a group of rigid evaluation of the figures, and lack of real-life similarity , stifle the majority of students to develop their potential . The purpose of differentiated evaluation between students is based on the student's own evaluation of personality development and different students is designated different options for different abilities, different types of students using the different evaluation test, that results can not be compared, the progress index is important. Let each potential student be most fully discovered and developed, and improve students into perfect type students.
The thesis fist presents the researching background, researching motive, the feature analysis of students and the formulation of evaluation quantitative change. At last, the thesis presents the particular implement strategy in the teaching process.
引文
[1] Canale,M.& Swain, M.The oretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing[J].Applied Linguistics.1980.1: 43.
[2] 课程教材研究所,英语课程教材研究开发中心. 英语(二年级上册) [M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,2003.
[3] Sweller J.Cognitive load during problem solving:Effects on learning[J].Cognitive Science,1988.12:258-281.
[4] Schlager, Mark S.; Fusco, Judith. Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice: Are We Putting the Cart Before the Horse? [J] Information Society, 2003: 203-221.
[5] 刘威.关于大学课堂登记评分的新思考[J].黑龙江高教研究.2004 年第 5 期.
[6] 何克抗.语觉论与英语教学改革[J].中国电化教育,2004.12:4-8.
[7] 余嘉元.估计信度的新方法在教育和心理测量中的运用[J].南京师范大学学报,1987.
[8] Hanna Kwasik, Pauline O Fulda. Strengthening professionals: a chapter-level formative evaluation of the Medical Library Association mentoring initiative*[dagger] [J].Journal of the Medical Library Association,Jan 2006,p.19 -30.
[9] 何育萍.多元智能理论与教师专业发展[J ] . 中小学管理, 2003.1.
[10] 周瑛 金瑞欣著.教育学[M].河北:警官教育出版社,1998 年9月.
[11] 刘本固著.教育评价的理论与实践[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2000 年 1 月.
[12] 教育部基础教育司组织编写.走进新课程——与课程实施者对话[M].北京:北京师范大学,2002年 4 月.
[13] 王景英著.教育评价理论与实践[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2002 年 1 月.
[14] Ellen Weber 著.国家基础教育课程改革“促进教师发展与学生成长的评价研究”项目组译.有效的学生评价[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003 年 1 月.
[15] 茅蓓蕾.PEP 小学英语教学与英语发展性评价的研究. 北仑教科网,2005.3.23.
[16] 沈壮海著.教育学导论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005 年4月.
[17] 胡咏慧 .新课程标准指导下的愉快英语课堂——谈英语课堂中如何抓好师生互动 . http://www.jiaoyan.cn,2005.6.26.
[18] 建构主义与教学改革.教育研究与实验[J].1998(3): 46-50.
[19] 何克抗.语觉论—儿童语言发展新论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2004.
[20] 何克抗.教育技术学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2002.
[21] 何克抗.教学系统设计[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.
[22] 英语课程标准[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.
[23] 李志宏、王晓文主编.新课程学生发展性评价[M].北京:新华出版社.
[24] 霍力岩.多元智力理论及其对我们的启示[J].教育研究,2000(9):71.72.76.
[25] Bachman, L.F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Oxford : Oxford University Press,1990.
[26] 杨九俊.新课程教学评价方法与设计[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[27] 霍力岩.多元智利理论及其对我们的启示[J].教育研究,2000 年第 9 期.
[28] 黄光扬.教育测量与评价[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.8.
[29] 乔爱玲,何克抗.以行动研究法探索英语教学[J].现代教育技术,2007.2:57-60.
[30] 董奇.促进教学的课堂评价[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003.
[31] 施良方.学习论[M].北京:人民教育出版社.2001.