明纹柏松毛虫生物生态学特性的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文通过在山西晋中灵石县调查和饲养明纹柏松毛虫,系统研究了该虫的生物生态学特性,为做好种群发生期预测预报有效治理松毛虫积累了数据。研究结果如下:
     1 明纹柏松毛虫在灵石县一年发生一代,以3~5龄幼虫越冬,翌年3月底至4月上旬越冬幼虫开始上树取食;幼虫多数有8龄,幼虫期133.5天,幼虫越冬前期和结茧化蛹前期发育历期较长;雌蛾比雄蛾寿命长;雌蛹蛹期比雄蛹短。
     2 明纹柏松毛虫幼虫主要在夜间取食,占全天总取食量的75.71%;7、8龄幼虫的取食量占幼虫期总取食量的76.48%;粪粒大小和幼虫龄期大小相对称,龄期越大,粪粒越大;同龄幼虫的粪粒大小和重量基本一致;幼虫每次脱皮前1~3天停止排粪,脱皮后一天内排粪量也较少,第二日才逐渐增多。
     3 自然条件下,成虫羽化后第一天即可求偶,求偶最早出现在20:00,从21:00起求偶百分率明显增加,22:00~23:00求偶百分率最高;雌蛾求偶行为系羽化后3~5天最强烈,羽化后第3天求偶百分率可高达100%,第6天求偶率明显下降。
     4 成虫随温度升高,产卵量和次数减少;卵在29℃~37℃连续光照下滞育,连续黑暗下,随温度升高发育历期减短,发育速率加快。
     雌雄成虫发育历期均随温度升高而减短,发育速率加快;连续黑暗时的发育历期比光照下的长,发育速率慢;无食物供应的发育历期比有食物时的长,发育速率慢。
     得到卵和成虫在各种不同条件下的有效积温预测式。
     5 明纹柏松毛虫幼虫的空间分布型为聚集型的负二项分布,聚集原因可能是昆虫本身的聚集习性或环境条件引起。
     6 采取烟雾弹急防明纹柏松毛虫幼虫灾害和利用诱虫灯捕杀成虫有非常明显的成效。
This article, which accumulates dates for founding the natural population life table of the D.suffuscus illustratus Lajonquiere and fingers prevention indexes in managing the D.suffiiscus illustratus Lajonquiere efficiently , studied the Bio-ecological characteristics of the D.suffuscus illustratus Lajonquiere systematically. Indicating as follows:1 D.suffuscus illustratus Lajonquiere has one generation each year in Linshi county, and spends its winter by the third to fifty stadia Larvae. The hibernating Larvaes of northern slops started to feed on trees at the end of the march to the beginning of April in the following year. Most of the Larvaes have eight stadia. It's 133.5 days in Larvae. There is a long growth period at the beginning of they get through winter and get cocoon to pupate, and the female lived longer than the male.2 The quantity feeding by the D.suffuscus illustratus Lajonquiere during seventh to eighth occupied 76.48% of the whole quantity in larvae. Most of them feeding in night, and the quantity they feed during night occupy 75.71 of the day, and the bulk of dung grain is according to the stadia of the larvae. The longer the stadia are, the larger dung grain is. The bulk and the weight are similar if they were in the same stadia. The larvae will stop excreting for one to three days when they will shed. The quantity of excrete will be larger two days later.3 In naturally, the results of female calling behavior showed that female began to call in the first day after emergence, and the calling activity was most intensive during 3-5 days and it went down from the sixth day. They may amphimixis at 20 : 00. The calling peak appeared at 22 : 00-23 : 00 o'clock.4 The quantity and time the imago can leg eggs will induce if the environment get cool. The egg disposed if settled under continuous sunshine of 29℃-37℃. The growth period gets slowly and the growth speed get faster if in continues dark and high temperature. The imagoes' growth period gets slowly and the growth speed gets faster in continuous dark or sunshine whenever there is food or not. But the growth period in continuous dark is longer than in continuous sunshine. According these we could get the Preformula of effective temperature of the eggs and imagoes period in different conditions.5 The special distribution patterns of larvae are congregating distribution. The reason is probable caused by the congregating habits or condition of environments of their own, guessing that is height or insect habits (laying eggs feeding) pollution and so on.6 The affection is obviously in using aerosol to prevent the disaster of their larvaes and in using the ultraviolet light to kill imago.
引文
[1] 侯陶谦.中国松毛虫[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
    [2] 陈树良.明纹柏松毛虫生物学特性的观察[J].森林病虫通讯,1996,1:22-24.
    [3] 山西省森林病虫害防治站.山西主要林木害虫图谱(第一辑)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1987.
    [4] 赵胜国.内蒙古自治区突发性森林病虫害频发成灾[N].鄂尔多斯日报,2003,6,13
    [5] 阎宝宏,赵晓国,冯斌.灵石天然林发生严重虫害[N].山西商报,2003,06,26
    [6] 北京农业大学.昆虫学通论(上册)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
    [7] 陈德明,马淑芳,张善干.油松毛虫雄蛾触角毛状感受器细微结构的观察[J].电子显微学报,2002,21(4):402-405.
    [8] 尹安亮,杨承志,张家胜,等.昌宁云南松毛虫自然种群生命表组建及幼虫取食量测定[J].云南林业科技,2003,6(2):60-65.
    [9] 尹安亮.云南松毛虫取食研究分析[J].保山师专学报,2001,22 (2):01-05
    [10] 马贵高,武绍庆,杨晓芬,等.文山松毛虫生命表组建及幼虫食叶量测定[J].云南林业科技,2000,3 (1):47-50.
    [11] 刘兴平,王国红,刘向辉,等.不同林相的松针对马尾松毛虫生长发育的影响[J].昆虫学报,2003,46 (6):720-726.
    [12] 刘宽余,孟庆繁,王立纯,等.大兴安岭落叶松毛虫生物学特性的研究[J].东北林业大学学报,1994,3(2):01-05.
    [13] 李莉,孟焕文,孙旭.落叶松毛虫生物学[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2002,3(1):101-103.
    [14] 张潮巨.思茅松毛虫生物学特性与防治研究[J].华东昆虫学报,2002,11(2):74-78.
    [15] 尹安亮,钏润芳,许国莲.云南松毛虫生物学特性初步研究[J].砥南林学院学报,2002,12 (4):53-55.
    [16] 许国莲,柴守权,谢开立,等.文山松毛虫生物学特性及两种生物杀虫剂防治试验[J].中国森林病虫,2002,10(5):15-18.
    [17] 马吉山.昆虫种群抽样技术研究的现状[J].林业科学,1990,26(3):254-259.
    [18] 郑汉业,夏乃斌.森林昆虫生态学[M] 中国林业出版社,北京,1995.
    [19] 柴守权,许国莲,谢开立,等.德昌松毛虫生物生态学特性[J].浙江林学院学报,2002,19 (3):277-281.
    [20] 许国莲,柴守权,谢开立,等.景东县云南松毛虫生物生态学特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2002,12(6):151-155.
    [21] 许国莲,柴守权,谢开立,等.禄丰县思茅松毛虫生物学特性的初步研究[J].云南林业科技,2002,3 (1):61-64.
    [22] 吕俊君.赤松毛虫蛹种群空间格局的研究[J].辽宁林业科技,1994,1:33-35.
    [23] 吴桂康,王树全,胡国才,等.德昌松毛虫空间分布型及其应用研究[J].四川林业科技,2000,9(3):60-62.
    [24] 陈宏胜,张潮巨,张思禄,等.思茅松毛虫幼虫空间格局与抽样技术的初步研究[J].华东昆虫学报,2003,12(2):61-64.
    [25] 张连翔,楚宝仓.油松毛虫幼虫种群空间格局动态分析[J].河北林学院学报,1996,12 (3):32-35.
    [26] 张世渊,肖灵亚,蔡道尧.松褐天牛蛹期生物学特性和有效积温的研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1999年,2:15-17.
    [27] 王莉萍,雷桂林,段兆尧,等.德吕松毛虫文山松毛虫有效积温的初步研究[J].西南林学院学报,2000,9 (3):169-173.
    [28] Syed Z, Guerin P M, Baltensweiler W. Antennal responses of the two host races of the larch bud moth, Zeiraphera diniana, To larch and cembran pine volatiles [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2003, 29 (7).
    [29] Howe, Annu R W. Uniformity of Leaf Shelter Construction by Larvae of Epargyreus clarus (Hesperiidae), the Silver-Spotted Skipper [J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, and 1967, 12 (4) : 13-16.
    [30] 范丽华.应用白僵菌在北方地区防治松毛虫和松叶蜂的研究[D].山西农业大学,2004年.
    [31] 李长森,张淑敏,石广学,等.低温对松毛虫幼虫越冬的影响[J].Forest pest and isease,2003,July (4):24-25.
    [32] 徐天森.林木病虫防治手册.[M] 中国林业出版社,1986.
    [33] 中国林业科学院,中国森林昆虫 [M] 北京:中国林业出版社,1980.
    [34] 陈昌洁.松毛虫综合管理 [M] 北京:中国林业出版社 1997.
    [35] 陈树良.侧柏松毛虫的研究[J].山东林业科技,1993 (2):38-42
    [36] 赵仲苓.毒蛾科昆虫幼期毛瘤研究[J].动物分类学报,2001,26 (1):51-60.
    [37] 赵仲苓.毒蛾科幼期的鉴别[J].昆虫知识,2002,39 (1):72-75.
    [38] 庞正轰,刘志祥.马尾松毛虫的两种色型幼虫的初步研究[J].广西林业科学,1994,6 (2):87-104.
    [39] 王滨.白僵菌持续控制马尾松毛虫的生物多样性和生态学基础[D].浙江大学.2003年.
    [40] 许国莲.云南省四种主要松毛虫的生物学特性研究[D].西南林学院,2002年.
    [41] 浙江省马尾松毛虫寄生性天敌及其作用研究[D].东北林业大学.2002年.
    [42] 周传良,刘雄兰,董丽云,等.为害雪松的思茅松毛虫生物学特性及其防治的研究[J].华东昆虫学报,2004,13 (1):111-113.
    [43] 张世渊,陆高.松褐天牛交尾产卵行为和卵期、孵化率测定[J].Forest Pest and Disease,2000,1:15-17.
    [44] 焦懿.中华滑翅跳小蜂生物学特性利种群动态的研究[J].昆虫学报,1998,45 (4):482-486.
    [45] 刘奎,彭正强,符悦冠,等.芒果毒蛾生物学特性研究[J].热带作物学报,2002,23 (2):27-30.
    [46] 刘友樵.马尾松毛虫[J].森林病虫,1965,(1):1-26.
    [47] 张执中.森林昆虫学 [M].中国林业出版社,1997.
    [48] 李孟楼.森林昆虫学通论 [M].中国林业出版社,2002.
    [49] 彩万志.普通昆虫学.[M].中国农业大学出版社,2002.
    [50] 萧刚柔.中国森林昆虫.[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
    [51] 50云南省林业厅,中国科学院动物研究所.云南森林昆虫[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1987:937-943.
    [52] 郑朝阳.华北落叶松鞘蛾生物学特性及其性信息素应用技术研究[D].山西农业大学,2004年.
    [53] 周淑辉.枣尺蛾性信息素生物学的研究[D].山西农业大学,2002年.
    [54] 李连昌,韩桂彪.蛾类性信息素研究及应用[M].中国农业科技出版社,1996.
    [55] 吴晓晶,刘树生,郑中良.变温对两种昆虫发育速率的影响[J].昆虫知识,1994,31 (4):237-240.
    [56] 朱锦茹,柴希民,何志华.温度和光照对松褐天牛生长的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2001,7 (4):27-30.
    [57] 李兆麟,贾凤友,侯无危,等.马尾松毛虫的光周期反应[J].昆虫学报,1994,2 (1):31-37.
    [58] 南京农学院.昆虫生态及预测预报 [M] 北京:农业出版社,1985.320-323.
    [59] 张育平.太原市园林昆虫群落结构及多样性研究[D].山西农业大学,2003年.
    [60] 赵培仙,冯永刚,许国莲,等.元谋德昌松毛虫空间分布型及生命表初步研究[J].西南林学院学报,2002,9 (3):42-46.
    [61] 郭剑雄,罗秀珍.茶细蛾幼虫空间分布型研究[J].福建茶叶,2003 (1):8-9.
    [62] 苏建伟.棉田叶色草蛉幼虫的分布型及其田间抽样技术[J].中国棉花,2003,30 (1):17-19.
    [63] 赵培仙.元谋德昌松毛虫空间分布型及生命表初步研究[J].西南林学院学报,2002,9 (3):42-46.
    [64] 陈宏胜.思茅松毛虫幼虫空间格局与抽样技术的初步研究[J].华东昆虫学报,12 (2):61-64.
    [65] 吴志远.杨梅小卷蛾幼虫的空间格局及其应用[J].福建林学院学报,1999,9 (1):41-46.
    [66] 陈顺利.竹小蜂幼虫空间格局及抽样技术研究,华东昆虫学报,1997,6 (1):50-53.
    [67] 刘铭汤,施德祥.黄帝陵古柏昆虫种群结构研究初报[J].西北林学院学报,1995,10 (1):109-112.
    [68] 张俊霞.山西省雁北地区青杨天牛自然种群生命表及营林技术对其自然种群的影响[D].山西农业大学,2004年.
    [69] 吴刚,夏乃斌,代力民.森林保护系统工程引论[M].中国环境科学出版社.1999.
    [70] 张华庭.采用屏蔽方法调查马尾松毛虫越冬代虫口试验[J].林业科技开发,2002,16:58-59.
    [71] 周国娜.基于GIS的森林病虫害生态地理因素分析与区划[D].河北农业大学.2003年.
    [72] 付建业.枣飞象经济阈值模型与交配行为的研究[D].山西农业大学,2000年.
    [73] 刘铭汤,施德祥.黄帝陵古柏主要害虫及危害研究[J].陕西林业科技,1995 (1):38-39.
    [74] 刘铭汤,戴建昌.黄帝陵古柏死亡原因调查[J].西北林学院学报,1995,10 (2):109-111.
    [75] 刘永华.野蚕黑卵蜂卵巢发育和卵子发生的研究[D].山西农业大学,2004年.
    [76] Asaro C, Sullivan B T, Dalusky M J, et al. Volatiles associated with preferred and nonpreferred hosts of the Nantucket pine tip moth [J]. Ryacionia frustrana Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2004, 30 (5) : 97-105.
    [77] Battisti A, Bernard M, Ghiraldo C. Predation by the hoopoe (Upupa epops) on pupae of Thaumetopoea pityocampa and the likely influence on other natural enemies [J] BioControl 2000, 45: 311-323.
    [78] Bernays E A, Singer M S, Rodrigues D. Trenching Behavior by Caterpillars of the Euphorbia Specialist, Pygarctia roseicapitis: A Field Study Journal of Insect Behavior [J], 2004, 17 (1) : 122-127.
    [79] Bernays E A, Chapman R F, Lamunyon C W, et al. Taste receptors for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in a monophagous caterpillar [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29 (7) : 154-140.
    [80] Claudia Ruf, James T, Konrad Fiedler. Trail-Based Communication in Social Caterpillars of Eriogaster lanestris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) [J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2001, 14 (2) : 68-74.
    [81] David B, James L, Rakestaraw, et al. Early gains from planting large-diameter seedlings and intensive management are additive for loblolly pine [J]. New Forests. 2001, 22: 97-110.
    [82] Edward B. Host locating behaviour of Leschenaultia exul and Patelloa pachypyga: two tachinid parasitoids of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1997, 85: 161-168.
    [83] Ilya I, Kudish, Kennethw, et al. Modeling of surface and subsurface crack behavior under contact loads in the presence of lubricant [J]. International Journal of Fracture 2004,125: 125-147.
    [84] Jorge toro, Stanley P, Gesses. Radiata pine plantations in Chile [J]. New Forests 1999, 18: 33-44.
    [85] Jose A, Hodar, Regino Zamora. Herbivory and climatic warming: a Mediterraneanoutbreaking caterpillar attacks a relict, boreal pine species [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2004,13: 493-500.
    [86] Katrien Maes, Pierre C, Debergh. Volatiles emitted from in vitro grown tomato shoots during abiotic and biotic stress [J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2003, 75: 73-78.
    [87] 冯玉元,任金龙,杨林.文山松毛虫的生活习性及烟剂防治技术[J].云南林业科技,2002,2:56-57.
    [88] Deng geng, He congxin, Wang yuejie. Using Luseweilei insecticide to control Dendrolimus superans T. [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2002, 13(2): 162-163.
    [89] Paul W, Schaefer, Yao Defu, et al. Capture of stipnotic candida males in traps baited with "leucomalure", the synthetic sex pheromone of leucoma salicis [J]. 森林病虫通讯,2000,5:39-40.
    [90] 唐冠忠.利用松毛虫初龄幼虫为害团特征进行虫情调查的研究[J].河北林业科技,2002.4:12-14.
    [91] 王正军,程家安,祝增荣.地理信息系统及其在害虫综合治理中的应用[J].浙江农业学报,2000,12(4):233-238.
    [92] Dyer L A, Dodson C D, Tobler M A, et al. Synergistic effects of three piper amides on generalist and specialist herbivores [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29 (11) : 89-95.
    [93] Fitzgerald T D. Role of trail pheromone in foraging and processionary behavior of pine processionary caterpillars Thaumetopoea pityocampa [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29 (3) : 32-35.
    [94] Leather S R, Beare J A, Cooke R C. Are differences in life history parameters of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea modified by host plant quality or gender? [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1998,87: 237-243.
    [95] Mamdouh M, Abou-Zaid, Blair V, et al. As the majorresistance factor to forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hbn [J] . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2001, 27 (12) : 78-83.
    [96] Martha R, Weiss, Jeremy D, et al. Potential non-target effects of a biological control agent, prickly pear moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: