大学生情绪智力、网络使用偏好与网络成瘾的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文在前人研究的基础上,采用问卷调查的方法,探讨了大学生情绪智力、网络使用偏好与网络成瘾的关系。研究工具为《中文网络成瘾量表(修订版)》、《情绪智力量表》、《青少年网络使用偏好问卷》。研究采用集体测试的方式,共发放问卷400份,回收有效问卷360份。经统计分析,研究结果如下:
     (1)大学生网络使用偏好、网络成瘾在性别、年级、专业上存在差异;大学生情绪智力没有人口学变量上的差异。
     (2)信息渠道偏好对网络成瘾有显著的负向预测作用;社交工具偏好、娱乐工具偏好对网络成瘾有显著的正向预测作用;而交易工具偏好对网络成瘾没有显著影响。
     (3)大学生情绪智力与网络成瘾有显著的负相关,对网络成瘾有显著的负向预测作用。
     (4)情绪智力和社交工具偏好在对网络成瘾的影响上存在显著的交互作用。在情绪智力低分组中社交工具偏好对网络成瘾正向作用比在情绪智力高分组强。
     (5)情绪智力和交易工具偏好在对网络成瘾的影响上存在显著的交互作用。交易工具偏好对网络成瘾正向作用在情绪智力低分组中强于情绪智力高分组,并且情绪智力高分组中交易工具偏好对网络成瘾甚至出现了微弱的负向关系。
     (6)情绪智力与信息服务偏好、娱乐工具偏好的交互作用对网络成瘾没有显著的影响。
This study explore the relationships of college students' emotional intelligence, internet use preference and internet addiction in the way of inventory. The instruments include Emotional Intelligence Scale、Chinese Internet Addiction Scale's revision and Internet Use Preference Questionnaire. 400 questionnaires were put out, and 360 valid questionnaires return.
     By way of statistic analysis, the results as follows:
     (1) There are differences of gender, grade and major on internet use preference as well as internet addiction; while emotional intelligence has no difference on demographic variables.
     (2) Social and recreational means preference have significant positive predictive effect on internet addiction, while the predictive effect of information service and life assistance preference on internet addiction is not significant statistically.
     (3) The college students' emotional intelligence has significant negative effect on internet addiction. To internet addiction, it also has significant negative predictive effect.
     (4) The interactive effects of emotional intelligence and social means preference on internet addiction are significant. In the group of low emotional intelligence, social means preference has the strongest positive effect on internet addiction, while in the group of high emotional intelligence,the positive effect is the weakest.
     (5) The interactive effects of emotional intelligence and business service preference on internet addiction are significant. In the group of low emotional intelligence, the positive effect of business service preference on internet addiction is the strongest, while in the group of high emotional intelligence business service preference even has faint significant effect on internet addiction.
     (6)Emotional intelligence and information service preference、recreational means preference has no significant interactive effects on internet addiction.
引文
郭永玉.人格心理学:人性及其差异的研究.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.11
    Burger,J,M.著.陈会昌等译.Personality(6th Edition).北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.9
    温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用.心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274
    唐汉瑛,马红宇.临床医生工作满意度的相关研究及职业承诺的调节作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2008 16(1):80-82
    卢谢峰,韩立敏.中介变量、调节变量与协变量———概念、统计检验及其比较.心理科学,2007,30(4):934-936
    李艾,李君文.调节变量(moderator)辨析:类型、表述和识别.数理统计与管理.2008,27(2):257-264
    龙立荣.层级回归方法及其在社会科学中的应用.教育研究与实验,2004,1
    白羽,樊富珉.大学生网络成瘾测量工具的修订与应用.心理发展与教育,2005,(4):99-104
    陈侠,黄希庭.中国大学生网络成瘾倾向问卷的初步研究.心理科学,2007,30(3):672-675
    陈侠,黄希庭,白纲.关于网络成瘾的心理学研究.心理科学进展,2003,11(3):355-359.
    崔丽娟,刘琳.互联网对大学生社会性发展的影响.心理科学,2003,26(1):64-66.70.
    崔丽娟等.网络成瘾对青少年的社会性发展影响研究.心理科学,2006,29(1):34-36
    杜亚松,黄莉莉.互联网过度使用的中学生的心理特征研究.中国健康心理志,2007,15(1):30-33
    段兴利,刘敏.关注新“社会病”——网络成瘾研究综述.甘肃社会科学,2005(4).
    范方,苏林雁.中学生互联网过度使用倾向与学业成绩、心理困扰及家庭功能.中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(10):635-638
    冯承芸,熊敏.贵州省1497名大学生网络成瘾状况及其焦虑抑郁水平分析.中国学校心理卫生,2007,28(9):801-802
    顾海根.国外网络成瘾研究简介.外国中小学教育,2005(9).
    顾海根.上海市大学生网络成瘾调查报告.心理科学,2007,30(6):1482-1483
    金鹏,林畅.大学生上网成瘾的问题研究及对策.黑龙江高等教育.2007,160(8):119-120
    雷雳 杨阳 柳铭心.青少年神经质人格-互联网服务偏好与网络成瘾的关系.心理学报,2006,38(3):375-381
    雷雳,李宏利.病理性使用互联网的界定与测量.心理科学进展,2003,11(1):73-77.
    李国瑞,何小蕾.情绪智力研究的现状及发展趋势.心理科学,2003,5:917-918.
    李宏利,雷雳.青少年时间透视、应对方式与互联网使用的关系.心理发展与教育,2004,2:29-33.
    李涛,张兰君.大学生网络成瘾倾向与父母教养方式关系研究.心理科学,2004,27(3):662-663.
    李秀敏.互联网内容偏好与大学生人格特质关系的研究.心理科学,2004,27(3):559-562.
    林崇德,白学军,李庆安.关于智力研究的新进展.北京师范大学学报,2004,1:
    林绚辉,阎巩固.大学生上网行为及网络成瘾探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15(4):281-283
    刘加艳,徐海玲,郑全金.大学生使用因特网心理因素分析,中国心理卫生2004,18(7):507-510
    刘加艳.大学生孤独感与互联网使用特点关系的研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):286-287.
    刘树娟,张智君.网络成瘾的社会—心理—生理模型及研究展望.应用心理学,2004,10(2):48-54.
    欧居湖.青少年网络成瘾问题研究.西南师范大学硕士毕业论文,2003.
    钱铭怡.第三届泛亚太地区心理卫生研讨会,2001,10
    苏文亮,刘勤学.对大学生网络成瘾者的质性研究.青年研究,2007,10
    汤明.大学生互联网使用者的抑郁感和孤独感及其与社会支持、网络成瘾的关系.北京师范大学硕士论文,1999
    万晶晶.心理需求补偿与大学生网络成瘾的关系研究.北京师范大学博士论文,2007年
    王才康、何智雯.父母养育方式和中学生自我效能感、情绪智力的关系研究.中国心理卫生杂志.2002,11:781-785.
    王才康.大学生情绪智力与焦虑、抑郁和心境的关系.中国临床心理杂志.2002,10:298-299
    王垒等.综合智力:对智力概念的整合.心理科学,1999,2.
    王立皓,童辉杰.大学生网络成瘾与社会支持、交往焦虑、自我和谐的关系研究.健康心理学杂志,2003,11(2):94-96
    王晓钧.情绪智力理论结构的实证研究.心理科学,1999,2:24-27.
    王晓钧.情绪智商(EQ)——当前我国情绪和情感研究中的谬误.中国社会科学,2000,3:116-123.6
    吴明霞,罗琴,李红梅,齐晓栋,欧居湖.大一新生网络心理问题调查研究。心理科学,2004,27(4):901-904
    吴文丽,郑希付.病理性互联网使用行为与情绪特征、认知需要的关系.中国特殊教育.2007,89(11):76-82
    徐小燕,张进辅.巴昂的情绪智力模型及情商量表简介.心理科学,2002,(25):332-335.
    徐小燕,张进辅.情绪智力理论的发展综述.西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,6:77-82.
    杨建锋,徐小燕,张进辅.关于中学生情绪智力的调查研究.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,4:650-654.
    张宏如.网络成瘾大学生动机与人格特质.健康心理学杂志,2003,11(5):398-400
    张秋艳等.中学生情绪智力与应对方式的关系.中国心理卫生杂志.2004,8:544-547
    祝丽玲等:大学生网络成瘾的多因素研究,中国学校卫生,2005,26(3)
    张辉华.管理者的情绪智才及其与工作绩效的关系研究.暨南大学博士学位论文,2006
    许远理.情绪智力组合理论的建构与实证研究.首都师范大学博士学位论文,2004
    中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).第20次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告,2007,http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
    中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).第17次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告,2006,http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
    Bar-On,R.Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory:Technical Manual[M].Toronto,Multi-Health Systems Ins.1997.
    Bar-On,R.Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory:Youth version.Technical Manual[M].Toronto,Multi-Health Systems Ins.2000.
    Bar-On,R.,& Parker,J.D.A,Handbook of emotional in-telligence:Theory,Development,Assessment,and Appli-cation at Home,School and in the Workplace.San Francis-co,CA:Jossey-Bass.2000
    Bar-On,R.The development of an operational concept of psychological well being[A].Unpublished doctoral dissertation[C],Rhodes University,South Africa.1988
    Chemiss,C.&Goleman,D.(Eds.).The Emotionally Intelligent Workplace:How to Select For,Measure,and Improve Emotional Intelligence in Individuals,Groups,and Organizations[M].2001
    Chou C,Hsiao M C.Internet addiction usage,gratification,and pleasure experience:the Taiwan college students case.Computer&Education,2000,35(1):65-80
    Ciarrochi J,Chan A,Caputi P.A critical evaluation of the emotional intelligence construct.Personality and Individual Differences,2000,28,539-561
    Davis,R.Aeognitive-behavioral model of pathologieal internetuse(PIU).Computers in Human Behavior,2001,17(2):187-195.
    Goldman D.著,耿文秀等译.Emotional intelligence(1995)[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,1997
    Goldman D.著,耿文秀等译.Working with emotional intelligence(1998)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000
    Hambyrger.Y.A.&Ben-ArtizE.Loneliness and Internet use.Computer inHuman Behavior,2003,19(1):71-80
    Kraut,R.&Kisler,S.M.,Boneva,B.,Cummings,J.,Helgeson,V.,&Crawford,A.Internet Paradox Revisited.Journal of Social Issues,2002,58(1):49-74
    Kraut,Scherlis.The Home Net filed trail of residential Internet Services.Communications of the ACM,1996;39:55-63
    Lopes P N.Emotional ability and the Quality of interpersonal interaction.Dissertation Abstracts International:Section B:The Science &Engineering,2004,65(3-B):1597
    Mayer,Caruso,Salovey.Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence[J].Intelligence,Vol.27,No.4,2000:267-298
    Mayer,Salovey,Caruso.Emotional intelligence:theory,findings,and implications[J].Psychological Inquiry,Vol.15,No.3,2004:197-215
    Mayer,Geher.Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion[J].Intelligence.1996,22:89-113.
    Mayer,Caruso &Salovey.Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence [J].Intelligence,1999,27:267-298.
    Morahan-Martin,J.,Schumacher,P.Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college student.Computer in Human Behavior,2000,16:13-29
    Parker,J.D.A.,Taylor,G.J.&Bagby,M.R.Tbe relationship between emotional intelligence and alexithymia.Personality&Individual Differences,2001,30(1),107-115
    Perris.C.,Jacobsson.L,Lindstrom·H.Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour Acta Psychiat scand 1980;61:265-274
    Petrides.K.V,Adrian Furnham,Norah Frederickson.Emotional Intelligence,Psychologist:2004:17(10):574.
    Kraut,R.,Patterson,M.Internet Paradox:A social Technology that Reduces Social and Involvement and Psychological Well-being? American Psychologist,1998,9:1017-1031
    Salovey P,Mayer JD.Emotiona-lintelligence.Imagination,Cognition and personality,1990,9:185-211
    Schutte NS,Malouff JM,Hall LE,et al.Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence.Personality and Indi-vidual Differences,1998,25:167-177
    Shapira,N.A.,Goldsmith,T.D.,Keck,P.E.,Khosla,U.M.,McElroy,S.L.,Preliminarycommunication:Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use.Journal of Affective Disorders,2000,57:267-272
    Young K S.Internet addiction:the emergence of a new clinical disorder.Cyber Psychology and Behavior.1996,1,(3):237-244.
    Young,K.S.& Rodgers,R.C.The relationship between depression and internet addietion.Cyber Psyehology and Behavior,1998,1(1):25-28.
    Kandell,J.J.Internet addiction on campus:The vulnerability of college students.Cyber Psychology and Behavior,1998;1:11-17