摘要
土地作为人类赖以生存和发展的重要资源和物质基础,越发受到人们的关注,土地资源在人类社会发展中不但承担着生产与承载功能,而且对社会经济的发展起到了重要的支撑与调控作用,在一定程度上土地利用方式能映射出一个国家或地区社会经济发展的模式,不同的经济发展模式,其区域土地利用方式也是有很大的差别。传统的直线型经济发展模式,客观的造成了土地利用方式的粗放化,建设用地扩张的高速化和土地生态环境的不断恶化,同时根据德国乌柏研究所(Wuppertal Institute)前任主席魏兹舍克提出的四倍数效应,若不改善技术,全球有限资源50年内将以每年2.8%的速度下降,所以资源生产力必须在50年内提高四倍才能满足社会经济的发展需要。所以进入21世纪以来,各国普遍关注低碳经济的发展和以土地为代表的自然资源的节约利用,以及生态环境的保护与治理,相继展开了循环经济的研究。循环经济以物质闭流循环为特征,强调环境保护和经济发展的内在统一,本着减量化、再循环与再利用的“3R”原则发展经济,它不但是对传统经济模式的变革,其基本理念对土地可持续利用理念的革新和土地利用方式的转变也具有很强的导向作用。本文正是从循环经济对土地可持续利用的导向作用出发,以黑龙江省为例,全面展开基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地可持续利用的研究。
黑龙江省位于我国的东北边陲,耕地、林地等农地资源丰富,社会经济处在全国的中游水平,主要以粮食生产和重型工业为主。全省13个地市区中资源型地市就有7个,长时期的资源开发与重型工业发展造成黑龙江省土地利用集约程度不高,城镇工矿等建设用地扩张较快,农村居民点用地较为粗放,农用地利用的干扰因素较多,土地生态环境受到一定程度的破坏。本文立足于循环经济理念在黑龙江省土地可持续利用中的导向作用,从黑龙江省土地资源利用的基本情况和特点出发,一方面通过基于循环经济理的土地可持续利用指标体系的建立,具体分析评价1996—2007年间黑龙江省基于循环经济理念的土地可持续利用情况;另一方面基于循环经济理念对黑龙江省土地利用结构进行优化,并对未来一段时期内黑龙江省基于循环经济理念的土地可持续利用情况进行合理的预测,近而提出基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地可持续利用的战略重点、模式及相关的调控机制与关键措施。本文的研究目的一是通过分析评价认清基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地可持续情况;二是结合循环经济理念对黑龙江省土地利用结构进行优化;三是对未来一段时期内黑龙江省基于循环经济理念的土地可持续利用情况进行合理的预测,并提出相应的基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地可持续利用的战略措施,以利于黑龙江省在新时期、新形势下土地可持续利用政策的制定。
本文首先根据土地利用变化模型对研究区1996-2007年的土地利用变化与过程进行了分析,重点分析了土地利用数量变化、土地利用程度变化、土地利用结构变化、土地利用过程中的生态服务价值和生态承载力的变化。土地利用数量变化的特点是建设用地、耕地、其他农用地和林地的面积呈增加趋势,草地和未利用地的面积有所减少。从土地利用程度变化来看,其土地利用整体处在发展期。而土地利用信息熵呈现先上涨后下降的趋势,土地利用多样性也呈现一种先提高后有序调整适度集中的趋势。在11年间,生态服务价值减少了39.12亿元,年均减少3.56亿元,年均减少率为0.07%,同时,人均生态承载力也略有下降。
在对土地利用动态变化情况全面分析的基础上,从自然、社会经济、政策和技术等方面对研究区土地可持续利用的相关影响因素进行了定性和定量的分析,从分析中可见,在短期内社会经济因素还是影响土地可持续利用的主要因素。结合土地可持续利用影响因素的分析,本文将循环经济理念与土地可持续利用的关系作为切入点,从社会经济发展、土地资源投入减量化、土地污染废弃物减量排放、土地资源再利用和土地资源安全保障五方面构建基于循环经济的黑龙江省土地可持续利用综合评价体系,同时,采用物元可拓模型,因素贡献率评价,障碍因素诊断和DEA分析等方法,对研究区1996—2007年土地综合可持续利用情况和农地可持续利用情况进行了全面的分析评价。1996—2007年间,基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地综合可持续利用情况良好,评价等级都在基本可持续等级水平,同时,农地可持续利用等级也都在基本可持续等级水平,而且两者的可持续利用水平呈现逐年提高的趋势,分别年均提高11.0和3.8个数量级。从因素贡献水平来看,在土地可持续利用综合评价方面,社会经济发展和土地资源再利用的因素贡献率基本保持稳定,土地污染废弃物减量排放和土地资源安全保障的因素贡献率趋于下降,土地资源投入减量化的贡献率有所上升;在农用地可持续利用评价方面,农业经济发展和农地资源再利用的因素贡献率有所提高,农地资源投入减量化和农地资源安全保障的因素贡献率有一定程度的下降。从障碍因素诊断来看,现阶段单位建设用地固定资产投资,单位城镇建设用地第三产业产值、单位耕地农药使用量和农民人均收入等是制约土地可持续利用的主要障碍因素。通过建设用地和农用地经济投入产出的DEA分析发现,1997—1999年,2001和2002年黑龙江省建设用地的投入产出没有达到综合技术效率有效;而1991、1993、1994、2005和2006年黑龙江省都不同程度的存在耕地面积的投入冗余。同时,全省各地区基于循环理念的土地可持续情况也表现出一定的差异性,哈尔滨市土地可持续利用综合评价结果相对较高,其次为大庆市,较低的是佳木斯市、七台河和双鸭山市,其他地市评价情况处在中游水平,但整体水平不高;鸡西市基于循环经济理念的农地可持续利用在全省处在相对较高的水平,齐齐哈尔和黑河两地市农地可持续利用水平较省内其他地市较低,其它各地市的农地可持续利用的水平总体相差不大。
在对土地可持续利用情况进行分析评价的基础上,采用灰色多目标规划方法,借助WINQSB2.0软件,基于循环经济理念对黑龙江省土地利用结构进行了分析优化,分别得到了以生态建设与中低产田改造为主、生态建设与耕地保护兼顾、耕地适度增长和耕地开发与生态建设四个有一定比较优势的土地利用结构方案,并通过综合效益的评定,选取耕地开发与生态建设方案作为2020年基于循环经济理念的黑龙江省土地利用结构优化的最优方案。
根据土地利用结构优化方案,并通过灰色预测和趋势推算等方法对评价指标体系中相关因素进行预测的基础上,对黑龙江省2010、2020和2030年土地可持续利用和农地可持续利用发展趋势进行了分析预测,结果表明,黑龙江省基于循环经济理念的土地可持续利用水平是不断提高的,2010年处在基本可持续利用水平,2020年和2030年将达到中可持续水平,到2030年黑龙江省社会经济的发展是推动土地资源可持续利用的主要驱动因素,同时主要障碍因素也向土地资源投入减量化和土地污染废弃物减量排放方面转移;农用地评价结果与土地综合评价结果基本类似,随着农业经济发展障碍度的不断下降,农地资源减量化投入和农地资源再利用的障碍度有所提升。
在对黑龙江省土地可持续利用情况进行分析、评价、诊断、预测和土地利用结构优化的基础上,根据黑龙江省农地资源丰富,土地利用结构多样等特点和建设用地集约利用水平较低,土地灾害面积较大,治理困难等问题,以循环经济理念为统领,构建了基于循环农业的农地利用战略,基于循环经济理念的建设用地结构优化战略,土地整理复垦战略和土地生态环境安全战略等土地利用战略模式,并相应提出了农地用养结合,以地养地和易地开发等保障机制和以循环经济为导向制定适合的土地利用规划,建立全省的土地循环再利用体系和建立土地灾害治理的制度化体系等保障措施。
People now pay more attentions on land as it is an important resource and physical foundation for mankind's survival and development. Land resource has the ability of productivity and supporting capacity in the development of human society; it also supports and controls the economic development. In a way the patterns of land use can reflect the mode of economic development in a country. Different mode of economic development has different way in its region land use. Traditional linear pattern of economic development objectively caused extensive growth of land use, high speed expand of construction land use and deterioration of ecological environment. According to four multiplier affect put forward by former Chairman of the German Wuppertal Institute, without improving technology, the world's limited resources will descend at a rate of 2.8% per year within 50 years. Therefore, resource productivity must be increased by four times in 50 years, in order to corresponding to the social and economic development needs. Since 21st century, every country has been paid close attention to low carbon economy development, economic use of natural resource and protection, and controlling of ecological environment and has started circular economy research. The circular economy takes material flowing in closed loop as characteristics and emphasizes intrinsic unification of the environmental protection and the economic development, to develop economy based on the "3R" principles of reduction, recycling and reuse. So it is a revolution to traditional economic mode and has a strong guiding effect on the principles and ways of sustainable land use. This article will starts with the guidance function of circular economy on the lands sustainable use, it takes Heilongjiang Province as an example, and shows how comprehensively there has been an increase in the study of sustainable land use based on the concept of circular economy in Heilongjiang province.
Heilongjiang Province is on the boarder of north part of China. It has plenty of arable, agricultural, and forest land, and lives on grain production and heavy industry which its social economy is in the middle level. Heilongjiang Province has 13 districts, 7 of them are resource based. However its intensive land use is not in a high level since longtime resource exploitation and heavy industry development, which also led to high speed expanding of industrial and mining construction land, extensive growth of rural residential land use, too many interference factors to agriculture land use, as well as damage to ecological balance of land. This article is established in the guide effect of circular economy on sustainable land use in Heilongjiang Province and based on the unique characteristics of land use. On the one hand, index system of sustainable land use on circular economy principle will build up to analyze and evaluate situations of sustainable land use in Heilongjiang Province between 1996 and 2007. On the other hand, optimize land use structure in Heilongjiang Province based on circular economy principle and to get a reasonable trend forecast as well, and bring up the strategic keystone, strategic modes, regulations and key measures of sustainable land use based on circular economy principle. For this reason, this article has got three research purposes: first, by analysis and evaluation, to realize sustainable land use situation with circular economy idea; second, to optimize land use structure in Heilongjiang province combined with circular economy principle; third, to get a reasonable trend forecast to the development trend of Heilongjiang Province’s land sustainable use and to propose the strategic measures of sustainable land use in Heilongjiang province based on circular economy principle in order to make it easier to draw up some relevant land use policy for Heilongjiang Province in a new period or new state. This article firstly analyzes changes and processes of land use for the research area between 1996 and 2007 according to the mode of changing land use. Analysis highlight changes in land use quantity, extent, and structure, as well as the ecology service value and ecology supporting capacity. Result shows that the amount change of construction land, arable land, other agricultural land and forest land have increased trend, whilst the grassland and unused land area has decreased. In terms of extent of land use, the land exploitation is just at developing stage. However, the land use information entropy shows a downward trend after the first rise trend, and land-use diversity also shows an orderly adjustment and a moderate concentration of the trend after the first increase trend. The value of ecosystem services reduced to 3.912 billion Yuan, with an annual reduction of 356 million Yuan, an average annual reduction rate of 0.07% during 11 years, while the per capita ecological carrying capacity has slightly decreased.
Based on the across-the-aboard analysis of changes and processes of land use, from natural, social economy, policy and technology sides, this article analyzes status of sustainable land use of researched area by quantitative and qualitative methods. The results shows that for now the key factor for influencing sustainable land use is still social economy factors. After analyzing the influencing factors for sustainable land use, the breaking through point is the connection of circular economy and sustainable land use. Based on this point, this article build up land sustainable use synthetic evaluation index system from five aspects which are social-economic development, quantity reduction in land resource investment, reducing discharges of land pollution waste, land resource re-use and safety control. At the same time, reviews from matter-element model, contribution rate of factors, obstacles analysis and DEA analysis, this article analyzes and evaluates the integrative condition of sustainable land use and agriculture land use from 1996 to 2007. The results displays that the integrative condition of sustainable land use in Heilongjiang Province is in good level and the evaluated degree is also in basic sustainable level, so as sustainable use of agriculture land. Meanwhile they are both in an increased trend which is increased by 11 and 3.8 magnitudes respectively. For contribution rate of factors, from the overall evaluation, the rates of social economic development and re-use of land resource keep fundamentally steady and the rates of reducing discharges of land pollution and land safety control drop down, and the rates of reduction in land investment climb up. Then from the evaluation of agriculture land sustainable use, the rates for agriculture economy development and re-use of agriculture land climb up, but the contribution rates of reduction in agriculture land investment and safety control drop down in some part. For obstacle factor analysis, the main obstacles that affect land sustainable use are fixed assets investment in unit construction land, output value of third industry on urban construction land use, pesticide amount in unit arable land and income per head of farmer. The results of DEA analysis on both input-output of construction land and agriculture land reveals that the output of construction land in Heilongjiang Province is not in efficient level from1997 to1999 and between 2001 and 2002. Meanwhile the investments in agriculture land are redundant in the year of 1991, 1993, 1994, 2005 and 2006. At the mean time the evaluation varies in sustainable land use in different region of Heilongjiang Province based on the circular economy principle, Harbin city got the highest level, then Daqing city, the lowest is Jiamusi city, Qitaihe city and Shuangyashan City, others are in middle level but the integral level is low. In addition, evaluations are different in agriculture land use based on circular economy. Jixi city has a comparatively high level but Qiqihaer city and Heihe city are lower, and other cities are in similar level.
Furthermore, baesd on the analysis and evaluation of sustainable land use situation, by adapting grey multi-object planning methods and with the help of WINQSB2.0 software to optimizing the land use structure of Heilongjiang Province based on the principle of circulation economy. The analysis leading to four structural concepts which have comparative advantages are: first, mainly focus on improving Ecological construction and Medium and low yield fields; second, give both ecological construction and protect and cultivated land consideration; third, increase cultivated land; fourth, cultivated land development. Moreover by evaluation of synthetical benefit, the sixth project is as the most preponderance project for optimization of the land use structure of Heilongjiang Province based on the principle of circulation economy in 2020.
Then, by the project of optimization of the land use structure and with utilizing Grey Analysis and trend prediction methods, the development trend of Heilongjiang Province’s land sustainable use and agriculture land sustainable use in year 2010, 2020 and 2030 has been analyzed and forecasted. The result shows that the level of sustainable land use based on the principle of circular economy principle had been constantly improving: In 2010 it will at the basic level of sustainable utilization; from 2020 to 2030 it will reach the medium sustainable utilization level; by the year 2030, social and economic development will be the major driving factor of utilizing land resources sustainably, at the meantime, the intervening obstacles will be shifting towards reducing the input of land resource and discharge of land pollution. Similar to the land integrative evaluation results, the agriculture land evaluation result showed that, as there is being fewer and fewer obstacles in the development of agricultural economy, it is getting more difficult in the implementation of agriculture land resource reduction and reuse.
Finally, by the analysis, evaluation, diagnosis and forecast of sustainable land use situation and optimization of the land use structure, based on the features that Heilongjiang is rich in agriculture land resources, diverse in land use structure; also based on the issues such as the level of construction land intensive use is relatively low, the area of land disaster is relatively large, and difficult to manage, lead by the theory of circular economy, the research constructs a series of land use strategic modes which include: the agriculture land use strategy based on circular agriculture; construction land structure optimization strategy based on circular economy principle; land arrangement reclamation strategy and land eco-system safety strategy. Ultimately, the research proposed guarantee mechanism such as integrating agriculture land use and maintenance,‘feeding’land with land and land exchange exploitation, etc. and protection measures such as land-circulation-reuse system and land disaster management system for the whole province.
引文
白金丹.2007.景观生态学与土地可持续利用[J].煤炭加工与综合利用,(2):54-56.
毕宝德等.2001.土地经济学[M].北京:人民大学出版社.304-308.
曹宝,李兴武,李丹.2004.美国土地管理局概况及其战略规划[J].中国国土资源经济,17(8):37-39.
车凤善,张迪.2004.美国农地保护政策演变及对我国的借鉴[J].国土资源情报,(3):21-26.
陈百明.1997.试论中国土地利用与土地覆被变化及其人类驱动力研究[J].自然资源,19(2):36-36.
陈柏利,孙秀芳,张百岩等.2003.黑龙江省土地资源可持续利用对策[J].农业环境与发展,(2):27.
陈成,郭贯成,王楠君.2005.循环经济与土地资源的可持续利用[J].国土资源科技管理,(6):93-96.
陈冬梅.2006.村域循环农业结构分析、评价与优化——以江苏省姜堰市河横村为例[D].南京农业大学硕士学位论文.30-36.
陈红.2003.资源型城市经济转型研究[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文.40-43.
陈宏民.2006.系统工程导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
陈向华.2006.基于神经网络模型辨识的土地可持续利用战略研究[D].广西大学硕士学位论文.35-39.
陈晓波.2005.关于发展循环经济实现耕地可持续利用的思考[J].台湾农业探讨,(4):36-38.
陈寅平,许潇.2007.黑龙江省县域发展循环经济研究[J].黑龙江对外贸易,160(10):17-19.
陈志刚,黄贤金.2001.经济发达地区土地资源可持续利用评价研究——以江苏省江阴市为例[J].资源科学,23(3):33-38.
成升魁,封志明.2007.中国可持续发展总纲——中国土地资源与可持续发展[M].北京:科学出版社. 25-30.
成升魁.2007.中国土地资源与可持续发展[M].北京:科学出版社. 80-85.
程莲.2007.城市边缘区土地利用结构优化研究——以乌鲁木齐市东山区为例[D].新疆农业大学硕士学位论文.50-55.
程志光.2006.中国土地可持续利用与人地系统调控[M].北京:科学出版社.
揣小伟,黄贤金,王倩倩.2009.基于循环经济的区域土地可持续利用评价研究——以江苏省为例[J].江西农业大学学报,31(1):166-172.
丛明珠,欧向军,赵清等. 2008.基于主成分分析法的江苏省土地利用综合分区研究[J].地理研究,27(3):574-582.
崔婷婷.2005.基于灰色线性规划的土地利用结构优化研究——以三门峡市为例[D].河南大学硕士学位论文. 20-26.
但承龙.2005.可持续土地利用规划理论与方法研究[D].南京农业大学博士学位论文.60-65.
邓波,洪跋曾,龙瑞军.2003.区域生态承载力量化方法研究评述[J].甘肃农业大学学报,38(3):281-289.
邓聚龙.2002.灰理论基础[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社.80-85.
杜欢政,张旭军.2006.循环经济的理论与实践:近期讨论综述[J].统计研究,(2):63-67.
封志明.2003.资源科学导论[M].北京:科学出版社.149-152.
冯达,黄华明,张毅等.2007.湖南省城市土地利用效率DEA分析[J].国土资源科技管理,22(1):51-54.
付强.2005.农业水土资源系统分析与综合评价[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.
傅伯杰,陈利顶,蔡运龙等.2004.环渤海地区土地利用变化及可持续利用研究[M].北京:科学出版社.35-40.
顾康康,刘景双,窦晶鑫.2007.资源型城市生态承载力对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态与农村环境学报,23(2):7-11.
国家环保总局.2004.全国生态环境现状调查报告[J].环境保护,(5):13- 18.
韩鹏,吕洁华,李大航等.2008.黑龙江省循环经济统计指标体系构建的研究[J].统计咨询,(3):4-6.
何格,欧名豪.2007.城镇建设用地效率时空分异研究[J].商业研究,366(10):123-126.
胡振琪,赵艳玲,毕银丽.2001.美国矿区土地复垦[J].中国土地,(6):43-44.
黄广宇.2002.福建省真实国民储蓄与资源环境损失研究[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),7(3):259-265.
黄娟.2007.江津市土地可持续利用评价研究[D].西南大学硕士学位论文.20-23.
黄利军,胡同泽.2006.基于数据包络法(DEA)的中国西部地区农业生产效率分析[J].农业现代化研究,23(6):420-423.
黄绿筠,吕欣苗.2004.推进循环经济发展促进土地可持续利用[J].生态经济(12):79-82.
黄贤金,陈龙乾,王洪卫等.1998.土地政策学[M].江苏:中国矿业大学出版社.281-284.
黄贤金.2006.区域循环经济发展评价[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.60-70.
贾绍凤,张军岩.2003.日本城市化中的耕地变动与经验[J].中国人口资源与环境,13(1):31-34.
江福秀.2008.基于土地利用安全的城乡用地优化配置[D].中国地质大学博士学位论文.60-65.
姜法竹,杨纯波,胡翠霞.2007.黑龙江省农业循环经济发展评价[J].中国农学通报,23(9):645-648.
姜硕.2008.基于生态足迹方法的临湘市土地利用结构优化研究[D].中国地质大学硕士学位论文.40-45.
李大全.2007.黑龙江省发展循环经济战略研究[D].东北林业大学硕士学位论文.15-18.
李冀云.2009.基于弹性规划的潜江市土地利用结构优化研究[D].华中师范大学硕士学位论文.10-13.
李景刚,欧名豪,高艳梅等.2006.基于资源价值重构的土地可持续利用规划研究[J].中国人口资源与环境,16(1):71-76.
李景刚,欧名豪,张全景等.2005.城市理性发展理念对中国土地利用规划的启示[J].中国土地科学,19(4):56-60.
李茂.2003.美国、加拿大等发达国家土地用途管制制度及其对我国的启示[J].国土资源情报,(10):2-6.
李茂.2003.美国生态系统管理概况[J].国土资源情报,(2):9-19.
李平,李秀彬,刘学军.2001.我国现阶段土地利用变化驱动力的宏观分析[J].地理研究,20(2):129-138.
李霞.2006.发展循环经济促进土地资源的可持续利用[J].内蒙古科技与经济(16):20-21.
李秀芝.2008.市域土地利用结构优化配置研究——以南通市区为例[D].南京农业大学硕士学位论文.32-35.
李云燕.2008.循环经济运行机制——市场机制与政府行为[M].北京:科学出版社.15-18.
李周,于法稳.2005.西部地区农业生产效率的DEA分析[J].中国农村观察,(6):2-10.
厉伟.2002.城市化进程与土地可持续利用[D].南京农业大学博士学位论文.50-53.
梁湖清.2004.循环经济与城市土地可持续利用[J].学术研究,(7):39-40.
梁丽,单薇.2008.河南省城市土地利用经济效益的DEA评价[J].河南科学,26(1):103-106.
梁学庆,穆会欣.2000.土地资源管理研究[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社.243-246.
刘冬荣,胡卫星.2005.循环经济:土地利用的新理念[J].国土资源导刊,(4):19- 21.
刘刚.2006.中国区域循环经济发展问题研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文.60-62.
刘黎明.2004.韩国的土地利用规划体系和农村综合开发规划[J].经济地理,24(3):383-386.
刘伟,关国锋,贾利等.2007.黑龙江省环境友好型土地利用模式研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,(1):48-49.
刘文甲.2006.关注我国土地“过度非农化”[J].中国土地,(8):26-27.
刘新平,孟梅,罗桥顺.2008.基于数据包络分析的新疆农用地利用效益评价[J]。干旱区资源与环境,22(1):40-43.
刘彦随,吴传钧,鲁奇.2002.21世纪中国农业与农村可持续发展方向和策略[J].地理科学,22(4):385-389.
刘彦随,郑伟元.2008.中国土地可持续利用论[M].北京:科学出版社.136-138.
刘裕春,李钢铁,郭丽珍等.1999.国内外保护性农业耕作技术研究[J].内蒙古林学院学报(自然科学版),21(3):83-88.
刘兆顺,李淑杰.2009.基于生态系统服务价值的土地利用结构优化--以重庆万州为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,18(7):646-651.
刘志玲,李江风,郑丹丹.2007.基于循环经济理念的土地资源可持续利用探讨——以广
西平乐县为例[J].安徽农业科学,35(21):6557,6575.
卢远,华璀,邓兴礼.2004.丘陵地区土地可持续利用的景观生态评价[J].山地学报,22(5):533-538.
吕小彪,周均清,王乘.2004.英国控制城市土地开发对中国的启示[J].小城镇建设,(11):90-92.
吕永霞.2006.土地利用结构优化灰色多目标规划建模与实证研究[D].广西大学硕士学位论文.20-22.
马凤娟.2007.我国农村土地循环利用的体制性障碍及对策[J].农业经济,(4):62-65.
马凤娟.2007.循环经济理念下农用土地的用养结合[J].安徽农业科学,35(15):4570-4573.
马瑛.2007.北方农牧交错带土地利用生态安全评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,21(7):53-58.
马永欢,周立华.2008.武威市凉州区发展循环经济的路径优化与仿真模拟[J].经济地理,28(5):1015-1019.
美国自然资源保护部.2000.1982-1992年美国自然资源变化趋势概述[J].水土保持科技情报,(3):30-32.
穆松林,高建华,毋晓蕾.2009.循环经济模式下的土地资源可持续利用问题[J].中国集体经济,02(上):26-27.
倪杰.2006.基于循环经济的土地资源可持续利用[J].农村经济,(9):79-81.
诺斯DC.1991.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:三联出版社.10-13.
欧明豪,雷国平,肖洪安.2002.土地利用管理[M].北京:中国农业出版社.30-33.
彭补拙.2003.长江三角洲地区耕地可持续利用研究[M].北京:地质出版社.50-52.
彭建,王仰麟,刘松等.2003.海岸带土地持续利用景观生态评价[J].地理学报,58(3):363-371.
彭建,王仰麟,吴健生等.2002.我国土地持续利用研究进展[J].中国土地科学,16(5):37-45.
彭珂珊.1998.98洪涝灾害的深层次原因系统分析[J].云南地理环境研究,10(2):14-24.
齐建国,尤完,杨涛.2006.现代循环经济理论与运行机制[M].北京:新华出版社.80-83.
钱易.2005.循环经济与可持续发展[J].国土资源,(2):4-5.
任奎,周路生,张红富等.2008.基于精明增长理念的区域土地利用结构优化配置[J].资源科学,30(6):912-918.
任志远,李晶,王晓峰.2006.城郊土地利用变化与区域生态安全动态[M].北京:科学出版社.50-52.
申伟.2009.基于精明增长的区域土地利用结构优化配置研究——以山东省济宁市为例[D].山东师范大学硕士学位论文.30-33..
师军,贾利,楼启阳.2007.黑龙江省土地节约利用可持续发展策略[J].国土与自然资源研究,(2):42- 43.
石火学.2006.循环经济与福建省土地资源的可持续利用[J].能源与环境,(3):18-19.
石建平.2006.良性循环的理论及其调控机制——循环经济研究新视角[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.50-52.
石瑞年,李晓东.2008.基于循环经济的城市土地可持续利用[J].资源与产业,10(3):25-28.
石玉林.2006.资源科学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.88-92.
时永明.2008.基于循环经济的黑龙江省黑河市矿产资源开发战略研究[D].中国地质大学博士学位论文.65-67.
史培军,李京,潘耀忠等.2009.土地利用/覆盖与生态资产测量[M].北京:科学出版社.50-53.
束雷.2002.英国土地利用与管理[J].中国土地,(2):42-43.
宋戈.2005.中国城镇化过程中土地利用问题研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社.60-62.
宋汉卿.2007.区域循环经济发展水平综合评价方法研究[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文.20-22.
宋新山,邓伟.2004.环境数学模型[M].北京:科学出版社.90-95.
宋旭光.2003.可持续发展测度方法的系统分析[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社.15-18.
苏珍,吴克宁,吕巧灵.2007.统筹区域土地利用促进循环经济发展[J].中国国土资源经济(2):25-27.
孙承詠,周景博.2007.制度创新与循环经济[M].北京:经济日报出版社.60-62.
孙国峰.2008.农地可持续利用的变量解释和实证分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),9(1):24-28.
孙圣军.2007.基于Bossel框架的区域土地资源可持续利用研究[D].南京农业大学硕士学位论文.50-53.
孙卫东.2002.区域国土资源复合系统可持续发展的系统研究[D].天津大学博士学位论文.40-42.
谭术魁,游和远.2006.基于BP神经网络的湖北省城市土地可持续利用评价[J].科技进步与对策,(10):147-150.
谭永忠,吴次芳.2003.区域土地利用结构的信息熵分异规律研究[J].自然资源学报,18(1):112-117.
汤吉,朱云峰,李昭阳等.2006.东北农牧交错带土地生态环境安全指标体系的建立与综合评价——以镇赉县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境20(1):119-124.
唐礼彬,李忠云.2008.基于循环经济的土地储备法律机制研究[J].中国国土资源经济,(1):24-26.
陶家元.1996.采矿废弃地复垦利用的研究_以黄石市为例[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)30(2):221-225.
陶在朴[奥地利].2003.生态包袱与生态足迹——可持续发展的重量及面积观念[M].北京:经济科学出版社.36-38.
田成敏,杨春德,刘殿成.2003.汉诺威原则与他的利用规划探讨[J].中国土地,(5):44-46.
田苗,武友德.2006.资源枯竭型城市产业转型实证研究[J].经济地理26(4):585-588.
田甜.2007.黑龙江省发展循环经济问题研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学硕士学位论文.40-43
田中文.2007.广汉市土地资源可持续利用评价[D].四川农业大学硕士学位论文.30=32.
佟香宁,杨钢桥,李美艳.2006.城市土地利用效益综合评价指标体系与评价方法——以武汉市为例[J].华中农业大学学报,64(4):53-57.
汪友结,吴次芳,罗文斌等.2008.基于循环经济的城市土地利用评价研究[J].中国土地科学,22(4):25-31.
汪友结,吴次芳,罗文斌等.2008.基于循环经济和多属性群决策的区域城市土地利用评价分类研究[J].技术经济,27(8):47-53.
王罡.2006.基于系统动力学的土地可持续利用能力评价[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文.46-49.
王红梅,王小雨,李宏.2006.基于计量地理模型的黑龙江省土地利用状况分析[J].农业工程学报,22(7):70-74.
王洪涛.2003.德国的土地开放空间政策——资源保护策略[J].国外城市规划,8(3):40-42.
王慧敏,仇蕾.2007.资源—环境—经济复合系统诊断预警方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社.66-68.
王景龙.2008.和谐发展论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.45-48
王静.2006.土地资源遥感监测与评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社.65-69.
王军.2007.循环经济的理论与研究方法[M].北京:经济日报社.87-89.
王军.2008.基于线性规划的罗甸县土地利用结构优化研究[D].贵州师范大学硕士学位论文.55-58.
王宁,刘平,黄锡欢.2004.生态承载力研究进展[J].生态农业科学,20(6):278-281.
王万茂,董祚继,王群等.2006.土地利用规划学[M].北京:科学出版社.88-91.
王万茂,韩桐魁.2002.土地利用规划学[M].北京:中国农业出版社.105-108.
王杨,雷国平,宋戈等.2008.黑龙江省城市土地集约度预测[J].国土资源科技管理,25(2):5-9.
王瑛.2008.中国循环经济立法研究综述[J].经济与管理,11(1):40-43.
王玉波,雷国平,唐莹等.2008.统筹黑龙江省土地利用分区与战略对策研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,24(2):61-65.
王治.2007.策勒县土地利用系统动力学模型研究[D].新疆大学硕士学位论文.30-33.
王宗明,张柏,张树清.2004.吉林省生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报,19(1):55-60.
卫海英,刘潇.2000.SPSS 10.0 for Windows在经济管理中的应用[M].北京:中国统计出版社.80-82
吴传钧,郭焕成.1994.中国土地利用[M].北京:科学出版社.90-93.
吴次芳,鲍海君.2004.土地资源安全研究的理论与方法[M].北京:气象出版社.50-55.
吴次芳,徐保根.2003.土地生态学[M].北京:中国大地出版社.90-93.
吴冠岑.2008.区域土地生态安全预警研究[D].南京农业大学.50-52.
吴季松.2003.循环经济的主要特征[N].人民日报,04,11.
伍新木,杨莹.2006.日本国土开发利用及其对我国的启示[J].中国人口资源与环境,16(4):138-142.
谢长青.2006.循环经济与城市可持续发展[D].四川大学硕士学位论文.30-32.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法等.2003.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报:18(2)189-196.
熊婷.2008.土地利用结构优化建模与实证研究[D].南京农业大学硕士学位论文.50-55.
胥国麟,吕成文.2006.芜湖市土地利用评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,27(6):65-68.
徐高田,陈勇,龚礼明.2003.首届中国循环经济发展论坛综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,(12):58-60.
徐士珺.2007.郑州市土地利用结构优化研究[D].四川农业大学硕士学位论文.25-28.
荀文会,刘友兆,王雨晴.2006.基于熵权物元可拓模型的耕地可持续利用研究——以江苏省为例[J].农业现代化研究,27(5):372-376.
颜章雄,严志强,黄宗葵.2006.广西县域粮食安全评价与虚拟土地战略的初步研究[J].经济与社会发展,8(4):36-40.
杨渝红,欧名豪.2009.区域土地循环利用评价研究——以江苏省为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),9(1):87-94.
杨战社.2007.循环经济理念下的城市土地利用规划方略[J].西安工程科技学院学报,21(4):249- 251.
宇振荣,邱建军,王建武.1998.土地利用系统分析方法及实践[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社.85-88.
张波,郑新奇.2001.济南市土地可持续利用研究[J].地域研究与开发,20(4):56-58.
张迪.2006.日本农地政策特点及对我国的借鉴意义[J].国土资源情报,(1):31-36.
张凤荣,王静,陈百明等.2003.土地持续利用评价指标体系与方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社.150-156.
张海林.2005.安徽杭埠河流域土地利用变化及其环境效应研究[D].上海华东师范大学硕士学位论文.50-53.
张华,李庆霞.2006.黑龙江省发展循环经济的对策研究[J].学术交流,150(9):102-105.
张晋石.2006.荷兰土地整理与乡村景观规划[J].中国园林,(10):66-71.
张晶.2008.基于生态系统服务价值的土地利用结构优化研究[D].西北大学硕士学位论文.30-32.
张琦,金继红,张坤等.2007.日本和韩国土地利用与经济发展关系实证分析及启示[J].资源科学,29(2):149-155.
张秋琴,周宝同,莫燕等.2008.区域土地可持续利用景观生态评价[J].中国生态农业学报,16(3):741-746.
张庭伟.2003.构筑21世纪的城市规划法规——介绍当代美国“精明地增长的城市规划立法指南”[J].城市规划,27(3):49-52.
张学玲,朱德海,蔡海生等.2007.基于循环经济的土地资源可持续利用[J].安徽农业科学,35(23):7231- 7232,7234.
张勇北.2008.以循环经济为主导统筹垦区经济社会协调发展[J].改革探索,(5):34-35.
张裕凤,王凤玲.2004.乡域土地利用结构变化分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,18(6):90-94.
章铮.2008.环境与自然资源经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.77-79.
赵娜.2008.基于系统动力学的土地可持续利用研究[D].南京农业大学硕士学位论文.15-19.
赵沁娜,杨凯.2006.发达国家污染土地置换开发管理实践及其对我国的启示[J].环境污染与防治,28(7):540-544.
赵薇,王兆君.2008.基于循环经济的黑龙江国有林区产业结构调整的再思考[J].产业经济,551(9):243-244.
赵羿,胡远满,曹宇等.2005.土地与景观——理论基础·评价·规划[M].北京:科学出版社.78-81.
郑国强,江南,刘兆德.2004.长江下游沿江地区区域环境承载力对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学杂志,23(1):16-19.
郑新奇,王筱明.2004.城镇土地利用结构效率的数据包络分析[J].中国土地科学,18(2):34- 39.
周生路.2006.土地评价学[M].南京:东南大学出版社.115-118.
周天勇.2004.城市化加速下的中国土地战略[J].中国土地,(1):33-35.
周向红.2006.加拿大健康城市实践及其启示[J].公共管理学报,3(3):68-73.
周晓林,吴次芳,刘婷婷.2009.基于DEA的区域农地生产效率差异研究[J].中国土地科学,23(3):61-65.
周颖,濮励杰,张芳怡.2006.德国空间规划研究及其对我国的启示[J].长江流域资源与环境,15(4):409-414.
朱会义,李秀彬,何书金等.2001.环渤海地区土地利用变化的时空分析[J].地理学报,56(3):253-260.
朱明峰.2005.基于循环经济的资源型城市发展理论与应用研究[D].合肥工业大学博士学位论文.36-39.
朱英明,于念文.2002.英国空间经济规划战略及其对我国的借鉴作用[J].世界地理研究,11(1):77-82.
朱永恒.2005.土地质量的概念及其评价指标体系研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2005(2):31-33.
诸大建,邱寿丰.2008.作为我国循环经济测度的生态效率指标及其实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,17(1):1-5.
诸大建.2007.中国可持续发展总纲——中国循环经济与可持续发展[M].北京:科学出版社.52-55.
庄丽,郑福云.2003.黑龙江耕地资源可持续发展战略初探[J].国土与自然资源研究,(4):20-21.
邹进宇.2006.长兴岛临港经济发展与土地利用战略研究[D].东北师范大学硕士学位论文.26-29.
A. Cooper, T. Shine, T. McCann. 2006. An ecological basis for sustainable land use of Eastern Mauritanian wetlands [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 67(1):116-141.
A. Van Paassen, R.P. Roetter, H. Van Keulen, et al. 2007. Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experience with LUPAS in the humid (sub-) tropics of Asia [J]. Agricultural Systems, 94(3):874-887.
A.J. Oskam, S. Feng. 2008. Sustainable land use under different institutional settings [J]. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 55(4):295-306.
Abdeen Mustafa Omer. 2008. Energy, environment and sustainable development [J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9):2265-2300.
Ackerman W V. 1999. Growth Control versus the Growth Machine in Redlands, California: Conflict in Urban Land Use [J].Urban Geography, 20(2):146-167.
Ademola K. Braimoh. 2009. Agricultural land-use change during economic reforms in Ghana [J]. Land Use Policy, 26(3):763-771.
Annette,R. 1998. Field expansion and reallocation in the Sahel-land use pattern dynamics in a fluctuating biophysical and socio-economic environment [J]. Global Environmental Change,8(4).
Antrop M. 2000. Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe [J].Landscape Ecology, 15:257-270.
Ashraf M. Dewan, Yasushi Yamaguchi. 2009. Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization [J]. Applied Geography, 29(3):390-401.
B. Cousins, M.T. Hoffman, N. Allsopp, et al. 2007. A synthesis of sociological and biological perspectives on sustainable land use in Namaqualand [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(4):834-846.
B.L. Turner II. 2009. Land Change Science [J]. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 107-111.
Beatrice Schüpbach, Kurt Zgraggen, Erich Szerencsits. 2008. Incentives for low-input land-use types and their influence on the attractiveness of landscapes [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(3):222-233.
Bryana. West. 1997. A Speculative Model of Population Influences on Australia's Ecology, Economy and Society [J]. Australian Geographical Studies,35(2):220-228.
Burton E. 2000. The compact city: just or just compacts a preliminary analysis [J].Urban Studies, 37(11):1969-2001.
Cheng ri Ding. 2007. Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 24(1):1-13.
Ching-Ho Chen, Wei-Lin Liu, Shu-Liang Liaw, Chien-Hwa Yu. 2005. Development of a dynamic strategy planning theory and system for sustainable river basin land use management [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 346(1): 17-37.
Chris Cocklin, Naomi Mautner, Jacqui Dibden. 2007. Public policy, private landholders: Perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(4):986-998.
Christopher Rodgers. 2009. Property rights, land use and the rural environment: A case for reform [J]. Land Use Policy, 26:S134-S141.
Churieco.E. 1993. Integration of Linear Programming and GIS for Land Use Modeling [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information System, (1):5-9.
Clunie Keenleyside, David Baldock, Peter Hjerp, et al. 2009. International perspectives onfuture land use [J]. Land Use Policy, 26:S14-S29.
Coppedge B.R. et al. 2001. Landscape cover type and pattern dynamics in fragmented southern Great Plains grasslands,USA [J]. Landscape Ecology,16:677-690.
Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. 1997. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital [J]. Nature, 386(6630): 253-260.
Daniel Kassahun. 2006. Towards the development of differential land taxation and its implications for sustainable land management [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 9:693-697.
David C. Howard, Richard A. Wadsworth, Jeanette W. Whitaker, et al. 2009. The impact of sustainable energy production on land use in Britain through to 2050[J]. Land Use Policy, 26:S284-S292.
Davis J A., Froend R. 1999. Loss and degradation of wetlands in southwestern Australia: underlying cause, consequences and solution [J].Wetland Ecology and Management, 7:13-23.
Diego de la Rosa, Maria Anaya-Romero, Elvira Diaz-Pereira, et al. 2009. Soil-specific agro-ecological strategies for sustainable land use– A case study by using MicroLEIS DSS in Sevilla Province (Spain) [J]. Land Use Policy, 26(4):1055-1065.
Downs A. 1998. How America's cities are growing: the big picture [J].Brookings Review, 16(4):8-12.
FAO. 1993. FESLM: An International Framework Evaluating Sustainable land Management[R].World Soil Resources Report 73. Rome, Italy.
Filion P. 1996. Metropolitan planning objectives and implementation constraints: Planning in a post-Fordist and postmodern age [J].Environment and Planning, 28:1637-1660.
Giedrius Pa?akarnis, Vida Maliene. 2010. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern: Applying land consolidation [J]. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 545-549.
Gouranga Kar, Ashwani Kumar, R. Singh. 2009. Spatial distribution of soil hydro-physical properties and morphometric analysis of a rainfed watershed as a tool for sustainable land use planning [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 96(10):1449-1459.
H.J. Reents, B. Küstermann, M. Kainz. 2008. Sustainable Land Use by Organic and Integrated Farming Systems [J]. Perspectives for Agroecosystem Management, 17-39.
IIASA. 1998. Modeling Land-use and land-cover changes in Europe and Northern Asia[Z]. IIASA Research Plan:156-168.
Iverson L. R. 1998. Land use changes in Illinois, USA-The influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use [J].Landscape Ecology, (1):45-61.
Jin-Song DENG, Ke WANG, Jun LI, et al. 2009. Urban Land Use Change Detection Using Multisensor Satellite Images [J]. Pedosphere, 19(1): 96-103.
John Baptist D. Jatoe, Emmanuel K. Yiridoe, Alfons Weersink, et al. 2008. Economic and environmental impacts of introducing land use policies and rotations on Prince Edward Island potato farms [J]. Land Use Policy, 25(3):309-319.
Johnson AR, Wiens JA, Milne BT, et al. 1992. Animal Movements and Population Dynamicsin Heterogeneous Landscapes [J].Landscape Ecology, 7(1):63-75.
K.B. Beesley, D. Ramsey. 2009. Agricultural Land Preservation [J]. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 65-69.
Keun-Ho Kim, Stephan Pauleit. 2007. Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: The case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea [J]. Land Use Policy, 24(1):264-274.
Long Ru-yin, Zhang Xiao-ting. 2009. Negative entropy mechanism of the circular economy development countermeasures in mining area [J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 1(1):1678-1685.
Luuk Fleskens, Jan de Graaff. 2008. A sustainable future for olive production on sloping land [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(2):73-74.
M. C. Treu, M. Magoni, F. Steiner, et al. 2000. Sustainable landscape planning for Cremona, Italy [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47: 79-98.
Maclaren V.W. 1996. Urban sustainability Reporting [J].Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2):185-202.
Marco te Br?mmelstroet, Luca Bertolini. 2008. Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners [J]. Transport Policy, 15(4):251-259.
Marion Potschin. 2009. Land use and the state of the natural environment [J]. Land Use Policy, 26:S170-S177.
Nico Heerink, Futian Qu, Marijke Kuiper, et al. 2007. Policy reforms, rice production and sustainable land use in China: A macro–micro analysis [J]. Agricultural Systems, 94(3):784-800.
Pauline Grosjean, Andreas Kontoleon. 2009. How Sustainable are Sustainable Development Programs? The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in China [J]. World Development, 37(1):268-285.
Qian Liu, Hui-ming Li, Xiao-li Zuo, et al. 2009. A survey and analysis on public awareness and performance for promoting circular economy in China: A case study from Tianjin [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2):265-270.
Qinghua Zhu, Yong Geng, Kee-hung Lai. 2010. Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6):1324-1331.
Qiping Shen, Qing Chen, Bo-sin Tang, et al. 2009. A system dynamics model for the sustainable land use planning and development [J]. Habitat International, 33(1):15-25.
Rohan Bennett, Jude Wallace, Ian Williamson. 2008. Organising land information for sustainable land administration [J]. Land Use Policy, 25(1): 126-138.
S.-L. Shaw. 2009. Transportation and Land Use [J]. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 470-475.
Sampsa Hyysalo. 2009. Learning for learning economy and social learning [J]. Research Policy, 38(5):726-735.
Smith A J, Dumanski J. 1993. FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management [J].World Soil Resources Reports, 73:1-56.
Syers J.K, Hambin A, Pushparjah E. 1995. Indicators and thresholds for the evaluation if sustainable land management [J].Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75(2):423-428.
Thomas Blaschke. 2006. The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75:198-226.
Tim Dixon. 2009. Urban land and property ownership patterns in the UK: trends and forces for change [J]. Land Use Policy, 26:S43-S53.
Tommy F. 1997. Land conversion and urban development in the Northern region of West Java. Indonesia [J].Urban Studies, 34(7):1027-1046.
V. Vandermeulen, G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2008. Designing trans-disciplinary research to support policy formulation for sustainable agricultural development [J]. Ecological Economics, 67(3):352-361.
Ventara S.J. 1992. Conflict Prediction and Prevention in Rural Land-use Planning: a GIS Approach [J]. Progress in rural Policy and Planning, (2):5-8.
W.E. Huffman, K. Fukunaga. 2008. Sustainable land use: landlord-tenant contracting in the United States of America [J]. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 55(4):379-396.
Wolf D G. 2000. Realising sustainable development with the information society-the holistic double Gain-Link approach [J].Landscape and Urban Planning, (5):179-193.
Xia Pin, Yang Hutao. 2007. Re-reading Steady-state Economy: Calm Thinking on Hot Circular Economy [J]. China Population, 17(3):20-23.
Xiao-Bin Wang, Dian-Xiong Cai, W.B. Hooogmoed, et al. 2006. Potential Effect of Conservation Tillage on Sustainable Land Use: A Review of Global Long-Term Studies [J]. Pedosphere, 16(5):587-595.
Yong Geng, Qinghua Zhu, Brent Doberstein, et al. 2009. Implementing China’s circular economy concept at the regional level: A review of progress in Dalian, China [J]. Waste Management, 29(2):996-1002.
Yong Geng, Qinghua Zhu, Brent Doberstein, et al. 2009. Implementing China’s circular economy concept at the regional level: A review of progress in Dalian, China [J]. Waste Management, 29(2):996-1002.
Yossi Tal, Harold J. Schreier, Kevin R. Sowers, et al. 2009. Environmentally sustainable land-based marine aquaculture [J]. Aquaculture, 286:28-35.
Zhou Z. 2000. Landscape changes in a rural in China [J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 47:33-38.