建设用地指标市场配置法律制度的立法构建
|
摘要
建设用地指标是土地开发权的表现形式,其能否合理配置事关国家经济发展和土地资源配置的社会经济效益。受传统计划经济体制影响,我国现行建设用地指标行政配置存在制度局限性,忽略了建设用地指标配置的空间均衡性,社会公众缺乏参与权和价值认同,政府权力寻租,在保护土地资源过程中产生了巨额的制度成本。市场配置具有弥补现行建设用地指标行政配置法律制度缺陷功能,其本质是在行政配置基础上通过私权机制对建设用地指标进行再配置。市场配置是建设用地指标配置的立法导向,通过建立建设用地指标市场交易的程序制度、指标交易的监督与救济制度,充分保障农民的生存权和发展权,通过公正的参与程序和制度规范,控制市场配置引发的建设用地指标投机风险。
Construction land index was the form of land development right.Whether it could be rationally allocated was related to the social and economic benefits of national economic development and land resource allocation.Influenced by the traditional planned economy system,the administrative allocation of the current construction land index in our country had institutional limitations.It ignored the spatial equilibrium of construction land index allocation.The public lacked participation and value identification.Rent-seeking existed in the government power.At the same time,huge amount of system cost was produced in the process of protecting land resources.The market allocation had the function of remedying the defects of the administrative allocation legal system of the current construction land index,whose essence was to reconfigure the land use index on the basis of administrative allocation through the private rights mechanism.Market allocation was the legislative orientation index configuration of the building.Through the establishment of construction land market transaction procedure system,supervision and relief system of index was trading to fully protect the right to survival and development of farmers.Through fair participation procedures and regulation,construction land index,market allocation could control of market allocation caused by land speculation risk.
Construction land index was the form of land development right.Whether it could be rationally allocated was related to the social and economic benefits of national economic development and land resource allocation.Influenced by the traditional planned economy system,the administrative allocation of the current construction land index in our country had institutional limitations.It ignored the spatial equilibrium of construction land index allocation.The public lacked participation and value identification.Rent-seeking existed in the government power.At the same time,huge amount of system cost was produced in the process of protecting land resources.The market allocation had the function of remedying the defects of the administrative allocation legal system of the current construction land index,whose essence was to reconfigure the land use index on the basis of administrative allocation through the private rights mechanism.Market allocation was the legislative orientation index configuration of the building.Through the establishment of construction land market transaction procedure system,supervision and relief system of index was trading to fully protect the right to survival and development of farmers.Through fair participation procedures and regulation,construction land index,market allocation could control of market allocation caused by land speculation risk.
引文
[1]但承龙,厉伟,王万茂.土地资源可持续利用规划耦合模型研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2001,(4)∶245-247.
[2]王名扬.法国行政法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998∶34-45.
[3]焦跃辉,黄萍,谢雯.论排污指标交易制度在我国的实施[J].经济法论坛,2006,(11)∶6-8.
[4]袁鄂,法素琴.浅析信息成本及职能制的影响[J].创新科技,2004,(11)∶34-35.
[5]詹姆斯·布坎南.寻求租金和寻求利润[J].经济社会体制比较,1988,(5)∶17.
[6]陶国庆.政府寻租行为分析及治理对策[J].生产力研究,2011,(6)∶126-128.
[7]庇古A C.福利经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994∶18-20.
[8]罗宇琦.城市被拆迁家庭户迁移的社会成本问题研究——以广西N市实证调查为例[D].成都:四川大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[9]靳相木.新增建设用地指令性配额管理的市场取向改进[J].中国土地科学,2009,(3)∶19-23.
[10]张文显.二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996∶507.
[11]车裕斌.中国农地流转机制研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2004∶126-130.
[12]许文惠,张成福,孙柏瑛.行政决策学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997∶78-79.
[13]罗书光,唐嵌.城市土地估价制度:国际比较与借鉴[J].中国物价,2007,(2)∶42-45.
[14]孙蕊,孙萍,吴金希.我国耕地占补平衡政策研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2014,(1)∶330-333.
[15]哈特穆特·毛雷尔.行政法学总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000∶381.
[16]梁凤云.新行政诉讼法讲义[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2015∶79.
[17]余凌云.行政契约论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006∶122.
[2]王名扬.法国行政法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998∶34-45.
[3]焦跃辉,黄萍,谢雯.论排污指标交易制度在我国的实施[J].经济法论坛,2006,(11)∶6-8.
[4]袁鄂,法素琴.浅析信息成本及职能制的影响[J].创新科技,2004,(11)∶34-35.
[5]詹姆斯·布坎南.寻求租金和寻求利润[J].经济社会体制比较,1988,(5)∶17.
[6]陶国庆.政府寻租行为分析及治理对策[J].生产力研究,2011,(6)∶126-128.
[7]庇古A C.福利经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994∶18-20.
[8]罗宇琦.城市被拆迁家庭户迁移的社会成本问题研究——以广西N市实证调查为例[D].成都:四川大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[9]靳相木.新增建设用地指令性配额管理的市场取向改进[J].中国土地科学,2009,(3)∶19-23.
[10]张文显.二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996∶507.
[11]车裕斌.中国农地流转机制研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2004∶126-130.
[12]许文惠,张成福,孙柏瑛.行政决策学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997∶78-79.
[13]罗书光,唐嵌.城市土地估价制度:国际比较与借鉴[J].中国物价,2007,(2)∶42-45.
[14]孙蕊,孙萍,吴金希.我国耕地占补平衡政策研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2014,(1)∶330-333.
[15]哈特穆特·毛雷尔.行政法学总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000∶381.
[16]梁凤云.新行政诉讼法讲义[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2015∶79.
[17]余凌云.行政契约论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006∶122.