论审判中心主义下的辩护质量——以法律援助中的指派辩护为视角
|
摘要
审判中心主义诉讼理念的贯彻实施,关注到了庭审的重要性,为律师能够进行有效的辩护提供了制度保障。但是现行《刑事诉讼法》只是着力扩大了刑事法律援助的范围,对于法律援助中的质量却没有给予同样的关注。面对近期出现的国家监察体制的改革可能对审判中心带来的冲击和我国的辩护现状,应把握好审判中心主义和辩护质量之间的关系,从现实出发,结合目前的司法体制的变化,以严格司法为保障,构建辩护质量的制度体系。只有这样才能真正实现审判中心主义下的控辩平等对抗,提高辩护质量。
The implementation of the trial centre doctrine of litigation is of great concern to the importance of trial and provides a system guarantee for lawyers to carry out effective defense. However,the current Code of Criminal Procedure only focuses on expanding the scope of criminal legal aid and does not give the same attention to the quality of legal aid. In the face of the impact of the recent reform of the national monitoring System on the trial Center and the present state of our defense,we should grasp the relationship between the trial-centered doctrine and the quality of the defence,construct the system of defending quality from the reality,combining the changes of the present judicial system and the strict judicature as the guarantee. Only in this way can we truly realize the equal confrontation of the prosecution and defense under the central doctrine of justice and improve the quality of our defence
The implementation of the trial centre doctrine of litigation is of great concern to the importance of trial and provides a system guarantee for lawyers to carry out effective defense. However,the current Code of Criminal Procedure only focuses on expanding the scope of criminal legal aid and does not give the same attention to the quality of legal aid. In the face of the impact of the recent reform of the national monitoring System on the trial Center and the present state of our defense,we should grasp the relationship between the trial-centered doctrine and the quality of the defence,construct the system of defending quality from the reality,combining the changes of the present judicial system and the strict judicature as the guarantee. Only in this way can we truly realize the equal confrontation of the prosecution and defense under the central doctrine of justice and improve the quality of our defence
引文
[1]周强.必须推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革[N].人民日报,2014-11-14.
[2]郭芬.审判中心主义模式下的有效辩护[D].上海:华东政法大学,2016.
[3]熊秋红.有效辩护、无效辩护的国际标准和本土化思考[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014(6):129-131.
[4]林劲松.美国无效辩护制度及其借鉴意义[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(4).
[5]左宁.左宁的刑事诉讼法(司法考试冲刺卷)[M].北京:中国工商出版社,2017:24-25.
[6]米森.我国刑事法律援助质量控制研究[J].太原大学学报,2013(2).
[7]顾永忠,杨剑炜.我国刑事法律援助的实施现状与对策建议:基于2013年《刑事诉讼法》施行以来的考察与思考[J].法学杂志,2015(4):35-51.
[8]陈瑞华.审判中心主义改革的理论反思[J].苏州大学学报,2017(1).
[9]马怀德,张瑜.通过修法完善国家监察体制[N].学习时报,2016-07-14.
[10]陈瑞华.审判中心主义改革的理论反思[J].苏州大学学报,2017(1).
[11]冀祥德.建立刑事辩护准入制度实现刑事辩护专业化——兼与张青松律师商榷[J].中国司法,2009(2).
[12]李天忠,徐琼.构建我国法律援助律师值班制度[J]中国司法,2011(11).
[2]郭芬.审判中心主义模式下的有效辩护[D].上海:华东政法大学,2016.
[3]熊秋红.有效辩护、无效辩护的国际标准和本土化思考[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014(6):129-131.
[4]林劲松.美国无效辩护制度及其借鉴意义[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(4).
[5]左宁.左宁的刑事诉讼法(司法考试冲刺卷)[M].北京:中国工商出版社,2017:24-25.
[6]米森.我国刑事法律援助质量控制研究[J].太原大学学报,2013(2).
[7]顾永忠,杨剑炜.我国刑事法律援助的实施现状与对策建议:基于2013年《刑事诉讼法》施行以来的考察与思考[J].法学杂志,2015(4):35-51.
[8]陈瑞华.审判中心主义改革的理论反思[J].苏州大学学报,2017(1).
[9]马怀德,张瑜.通过修法完善国家监察体制[N].学习时报,2016-07-14.
[10]陈瑞华.审判中心主义改革的理论反思[J].苏州大学学报,2017(1).
[11]冀祥德.建立刑事辩护准入制度实现刑事辩护专业化——兼与张青松律师商榷[J].中国司法,2009(2).
[12]李天忠,徐琼.构建我国法律援助律师值班制度[J]中国司法,2011(11).