乡村振兴背景下镇域高标准农田建设条件及发展模式研究
|
摘要
为了解新时代乡村振兴战略与高标准农田建设之间的关系,以地块为评价单元,通过建设适宜性、空间稳定性测度、耦合协调度模型以及局部空间自相关分析,对古路镇耕地进行分析评价,划分高标准农田建设区域,并根据各项目区主要发展障碍明确项目建设模式及方向.研究表明:(1)古路镇高标准农田建设适宜性指数介于0.261 8～0.798 6之间,空间稳定性指数介于0.439 7～0.999 9之间,高标准农田建设适宜—空间稳定耦合协调度较高,高标准农田建设适宜性、空间稳定性及其耦合协调关系在空间上均存在较强的正相关关系;(2)古路镇高标准农田建设可划分为优先划定区、重点建设区、后备调控区和生态缓冲区等4个总体分区和19个详细分区,依据资源禀赋确定产业兴旺—集约高效、提质增效—产业培育、补齐短板—整合资源、生态宜居—环境整治等4个发展模式;(3)古路镇耕地资源总体上呈现"西优东劣""南退北稳"的空间格局,应充分发挥耕地资源优势,重视生态保护;(4)现行规划中古路镇的高标准农田建设项目全部位于优先划定区和重点建设区,布局较为合理.
This paper analyzes the relationship between the strategy of rural vitalization and the construction of well-facilitated farmland in the new era.In this paper,plot is used as an evaluation unit to analyze and evaluate the cultivated fields of Gulu town through the construction of a model for the measurement of suitability,spatial stability and coupling coordination and the local spatial association analysis.Based on the evaluation results,this paper divides the well-facilitated farmland construction areas and defines the project construction mode and direction according to the main development obstacles in each project area.The research indicates that the suitability index of well-facilitated farmland construction and the spatial stability index in Gulu town are in the range of 0.261 8-0.798 6and 0.439 7-0.999 9,respectively,and the coupling degree of the two is relatively high.There is a strong positive correlation between spatial suitability,spatial stability and coupling coordination of well-facilitated farmland construction.The well-facilitated farmland construction in Gulu town can be divided into 4areas and 19 subareas,i.e.priority delimitation area,key construction area,backup regulation area,and ecological buffer area.Based on their resource conditions,four development modes are identified accordingly.The cultivated field resources of Gulu town generally present a spatial pattern of"West superiority and East inferiority"and"South unstable and North stable".The advantages of cultivated field resources should be brought into full play,and ecological protection should be emphasized.Well-facilitated farmland construction projects of Gulu town in current planning are all located in priority demarcation areas and key construction areas and the layout is reasonable.
This paper analyzes the relationship between the strategy of rural vitalization and the construction of well-facilitated farmland in the new era.In this paper,plot is used as an evaluation unit to analyze and evaluate the cultivated fields of Gulu town through the construction of a model for the measurement of suitability,spatial stability and coupling coordination and the local spatial association analysis.Based on the evaluation results,this paper divides the well-facilitated farmland construction areas and defines the project construction mode and direction according to the main development obstacles in each project area.The research indicates that the suitability index of well-facilitated farmland construction and the spatial stability index in Gulu town are in the range of 0.261 8-0.798 6and 0.439 7-0.999 9,respectively,and the coupling degree of the two is relatively high.There is a strong positive correlation between spatial suitability,spatial stability and coupling coordination of well-facilitated farmland construction.The well-facilitated farmland construction in Gulu town can be divided into 4areas and 19 subareas,i.e.priority delimitation area,key construction area,backup regulation area,and ecological buffer area.Based on their resource conditions,four development modes are identified accordingly.The cultivated field resources of Gulu town generally present a spatial pattern of"West superiority and East inferiority"and"South unstable and North stable".The advantages of cultivated field resources should be brought into full play,and ecological protection should be emphasized.Well-facilitated farmland construction projects of Gulu town in current planning are all located in priority demarcation areas and key construction areas and the layout is reasonable.
引文
[1]刘彦随.中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650.
[2]李少帅,郧文聚.高标准基本农田建设存在的问题及对策[J].资源与产业,2012,14(3):189-193.
[3]杨建宇,杜贞容,杜振博,等.基于耕地质量评价和局部空间自相关的高标准农田划定[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(6):109-115.
[4]陈美球,洪土林,刘桃菊.高标准农田建设的"困"与"解"[J].中国土地,2017(7):15-16.
[5]薛剑.高标准农田标准与建设路径研究——以黑龙江省富锦市为例[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014.
[6]冯锐,吴克宁,王倩.四川省中江县高标准基本农田建设时序与模式分区[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(22):243-251.
[7]唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于四象限法的县域高标准基本农田建设布局与模式[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):238-246+293.
[8]赵冬玲,何珊珊,林尚纬,等.基于TOPSIS和热点分析的高标准农田建设优先区选择[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(7):153-158.
[9]雒振军.县域高标准农田建设工程分区及选址研究——以河南省南乐县为例[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[10]陈宁丽.高标准基本农田建设项目区优选研究[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2016.
[11]薛剑,韩娟,张凤荣,等.高标准基本农田建设评价模型的构建及建设时序的确定[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(5):193-203.
[12]信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[13]孙茜,牛海鹏,雷国平,等.高标准农田建设区域划定与项目区选址研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(12):337-346.
[14]蔡朕,刁承泰,王锐,等.基于模糊物元模型的高标准基本农田建设项目选址合理性评价[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(12):128-134.
[15]赵素霞,牛海鹏,张合兵,等.高标准农田生态位障碍因子诊断模型建立与应用[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(1):194-202.
[16]王新盼,姜广辉,张瑞娟,等.高标准基本农田建设区域划定方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):241-250.
[17]杨绪红,金晓斌,郭贝贝,等.基于最小费用距离模型的高标准基本农田建设区划定方法[J].南京大学学报(自然科学),2014,50(2):202-210.
[18]边振兴,杨子娇,钱凤魁,等.基于LESA体系的高标准基本农田建设时序研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(3):436-446.
[19]杨伟,谢德体,廖和平,等.基于高标准基本农田建设模式的农用地整治潜力分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(7):219-229+298.
[20]易平,方世明.地质公园社会经济与生态环境效益耦合协调度研究——以嵩山世界地质公园为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):206-216.
[21]郭敏,李淑杰.基于局部空间自相关的耕地质量空间集聚性和保护分区——以吉林省九台市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(3):206-210.
[22]陈藜藜,宋戈,邹朝晖,等.基于改进局部空间自相关分析的萝北县耕地保护分区[J].资源科学,2016,38(10):1871-1882.
[23]熊昌盛,谭荣,岳文泽.基于局部空间自相关的高标准基本农田建设分区[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):276-284.
[24]周晓飞,雷国平,徐珊.城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断——以哈尔滨市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):126-130.
[2]李少帅,郧文聚.高标准基本农田建设存在的问题及对策[J].资源与产业,2012,14(3):189-193.
[3]杨建宇,杜贞容,杜振博,等.基于耕地质量评价和局部空间自相关的高标准农田划定[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(6):109-115.
[4]陈美球,洪土林,刘桃菊.高标准农田建设的"困"与"解"[J].中国土地,2017(7):15-16.
[5]薛剑.高标准农田标准与建设路径研究——以黑龙江省富锦市为例[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014.
[6]冯锐,吴克宁,王倩.四川省中江县高标准基本农田建设时序与模式分区[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(22):243-251.
[7]唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于四象限法的县域高标准基本农田建设布局与模式[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):238-246+293.
[8]赵冬玲,何珊珊,林尚纬,等.基于TOPSIS和热点分析的高标准农田建设优先区选择[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(7):153-158.
[9]雒振军.县域高标准农田建设工程分区及选址研究——以河南省南乐县为例[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[10]陈宁丽.高标准基本农田建设项目区优选研究[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2016.
[11]薛剑,韩娟,张凤荣,等.高标准基本农田建设评价模型的构建及建设时序的确定[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(5):193-203.
[12]信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[13]孙茜,牛海鹏,雷国平,等.高标准农田建设区域划定与项目区选址研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(12):337-346.
[14]蔡朕,刁承泰,王锐,等.基于模糊物元模型的高标准基本农田建设项目选址合理性评价[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(12):128-134.
[15]赵素霞,牛海鹏,张合兵,等.高标准农田生态位障碍因子诊断模型建立与应用[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(1):194-202.
[16]王新盼,姜广辉,张瑞娟,等.高标准基本农田建设区域划定方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):241-250.
[17]杨绪红,金晓斌,郭贝贝,等.基于最小费用距离模型的高标准基本农田建设区划定方法[J].南京大学学报(自然科学),2014,50(2):202-210.
[18]边振兴,杨子娇,钱凤魁,等.基于LESA体系的高标准基本农田建设时序研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(3):436-446.
[19]杨伟,谢德体,廖和平,等.基于高标准基本农田建设模式的农用地整治潜力分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(7):219-229+298.
[20]易平,方世明.地质公园社会经济与生态环境效益耦合协调度研究——以嵩山世界地质公园为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):206-216.
[21]郭敏,李淑杰.基于局部空间自相关的耕地质量空间集聚性和保护分区——以吉林省九台市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(3):206-210.
[22]陈藜藜,宋戈,邹朝晖,等.基于改进局部空间自相关分析的萝北县耕地保护分区[J].资源科学,2016,38(10):1871-1882.
[23]熊昌盛,谭荣,岳文泽.基于局部空间自相关的高标准基本农田建设分区[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):276-284.
[24]周晓飞,雷国平,徐珊.城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断——以哈尔滨市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):126-130.