城市人口规模对流动人口教育回报率的影响
|
摘要
使用中国流动人口动态监测数据,采用普通最小二乘回归、赫克曼两步法、工具变量回归,对不同地区的城市、受不同教育政策影响的个体进行了异质性分析。结果显示:城市人口规模越大,流动人口的教育回报率越高;从区域异质性来看,东部地区城市人口规模对流动人口的教育回报率存在显著影响,而中西部以及东北地区则不显著;从个体异质性来看,城市人口规模对受不同教育政策影响的流动人口的教育回报率均具有显著影响,但影响程度不同,对仅受义务教育法实施影响的流动人口的教育回报率影响最大。
Using dynamic monitoring data of China's floating population,this essay analyzes the heterogeneity of cities in different regions and the individuals under different educational policies by using OLS,Heckman Two Stage Model and IV Method. The results show: The larger size of urban population,the higher the floating population rate of return to education;From the regional heterogeneity,eastern urban population size significantly affects the floating population's rate of returns to education,while the mid,the west and the northeast region are not significant. From the individualization heterogeneity, the size of urban population has a significant influence on the rate of return on education of three kinds of floating population affected by different education policies,but the influence degree is different; The people who is only influenced by the compulsory education law is influenced more.
Using dynamic monitoring data of China's floating population,this essay analyzes the heterogeneity of cities in different regions and the individuals under different educational policies by using OLS,Heckman Two Stage Model and IV Method. The results show: The larger size of urban population,the higher the floating population rate of return to education;From the regional heterogeneity,eastern urban population size significantly affects the floating population's rate of returns to education,while the mid,the west and the northeast region are not significant. From the individualization heterogeneity, the size of urban population has a significant influence on the rate of return on education of three kinds of floating population affected by different education policies,but the influence degree is different; The people who is only influenced by the compulsory education law is influenced more.
引文
[1]Castells-Quintana D.Malthus Living in a Slum:Urban Concentration,Infrastructure and Economic Growth[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2017(98):158-173
[2]陆铭,高虹,佐藤宏.城市规模与包容性就业[J].中国社会科学,2012(10):47-66
[3]夏怡然,苏锦红,黄伟.流动人口向哪里集聚?---流入地城市特征及其变动趋势[J].人口与经济,2015(3):13-22
[4]余运江,高向东.市场潜能与流动人口工资差异:基于异质性视角的分析[J].世界经济,2017(12):98-118
[5]申广军,龚雅娴,姚洋.金融发展与教育回报率的地区差异[J].金融研究,2015(3):131-145
[6]刘生龙,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计[J].经济研究,2016(2):154-167
[7]杜两省,彭竞.教育回报率的城市差异研究[J].中国人口科学,2010(5):85-94
[8]邢春冰,贾淑艳,李实.教育回报率的地区差异及其对劳动力流动的影响[J].经济研究,2013(11):114-126
[9]王静,武舜臣.教育回报率的职业差异与新生代农民工职业流动---基于2010年流动人口动态监测数据分析[J].教育与经济,2015(6):61-68
[10]叶林祥,李实,罗楚亮.行业垄断、所有制与企业工资收入差距---基于第一次全国经济普查企业数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2011(4):26-36
[11]刘生龙,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计[J].经济研究,2016(2):154-167
[12]Behrens K,Duranton G,Robert-Nicoud F.Productive Cities:Sorting,Selection and Agglomeration[J].Journal of Political E-conomy.2014(3):507-553
[2]陆铭,高虹,佐藤宏.城市规模与包容性就业[J].中国社会科学,2012(10):47-66
[3]夏怡然,苏锦红,黄伟.流动人口向哪里集聚?---流入地城市特征及其变动趋势[J].人口与经济,2015(3):13-22
[4]余运江,高向东.市场潜能与流动人口工资差异:基于异质性视角的分析[J].世界经济,2017(12):98-118
[5]申广军,龚雅娴,姚洋.金融发展与教育回报率的地区差异[J].金融研究,2015(3):131-145
[6]刘生龙,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计[J].经济研究,2016(2):154-167
[7]杜两省,彭竞.教育回报率的城市差异研究[J].中国人口科学,2010(5):85-94
[8]邢春冰,贾淑艳,李实.教育回报率的地区差异及其对劳动力流动的影响[J].经济研究,2013(11):114-126
[9]王静,武舜臣.教育回报率的职业差异与新生代农民工职业流动---基于2010年流动人口动态监测数据分析[J].教育与经济,2015(6):61-68
[10]叶林祥,李实,罗楚亮.行业垄断、所有制与企业工资收入差距---基于第一次全国经济普查企业数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2011(4):26-36
[11]刘生龙,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计[J].经济研究,2016(2):154-167
[12]Behrens K,Duranton G,Robert-Nicoud F.Productive Cities:Sorting,Selection and Agglomeration[J].Journal of Political E-conomy.2014(3):507-553