杭州市传统村落空间分布特征及旅游开发策略研究
|
摘要
通过实地调查访问,获取杭州市截止到2016年前四批公布的36个传统村落信息,利用ArcGIS将传统村落位置可视化,制作了杭州市传统村落的核密度,并将传统村落分布数据与地形数据、交通数据、经济数据和人口数据叠加,探究杭州市传统村落的空间分布特征,并提出旅游开发策略。得到以下结论:(1)杭州市传统村落在空间分布上呈现两大聚集区;集中分布于地势低平及交通较便捷的地区;且位于经济发展较慢、人口密度较低地区。(2)杭州市传统村落的旅游开发策略主要有:将杭州市传统村落与旅游景区实现联动发展;传统村落开发过程中保护优先,突出特色;旅游开发注重以人为本,协调好游客和当地居民之间的利益。
The information of 36 traditional villages in Hangzhou was achieved by a lot of investigations on the spot. The location of traditional villages was visualized with ArcGIS, and the nuclear density of traditional villages was drawn through the spatial analysis of ArcGIS. Then the traditional village distribution data were overlaid with DEM,traffic, economic and population data, respectively. The spatial distribution characteristics of traditional villages in Hangzhou were researched and the tourism development strategies were put forward. The following conclusions were drawn.( 1) There were two major agglomeration areas of traditional villages, and most traditional villages distributed in flat area with convenient transportation. Most traditional villages located in the areas with slow economic development and low population density.( 2) Boosting the interactive development of the traditional villages and tourist scenic spots was strategically important. When the traditional villages were developed with the distinguishing feature, they must be protected firstly. The interests of tourists and local residents should be coordinated, during the development process.
The information of 36 traditional villages in Hangzhou was achieved by a lot of investigations on the spot. The location of traditional villages was visualized with ArcGIS, and the nuclear density of traditional villages was drawn through the spatial analysis of ArcGIS. Then the traditional village distribution data were overlaid with DEM,traffic, economic and population data, respectively. The spatial distribution characteristics of traditional villages in Hangzhou were researched and the tourism development strategies were put forward. The following conclusions were drawn.( 1) There were two major agglomeration areas of traditional villages, and most traditional villages distributed in flat area with convenient transportation. Most traditional villages located in the areas with slow economic development and low population density.( 2) Boosting the interactive development of the traditional villages and tourist scenic spots was strategically important. When the traditional villages were developed with the distinguishing feature, they must be protected firstly. The interests of tourists and local residents should be coordinated, during the development process.
引文
[1]程海帆,李楠,毛志睿.传统村落更新的动力机制初探——基于当前旅游发展背景之下[J].建筑学报, 2011,(9):100-103.
[2]李萍,王倩, Chris Ryan.旅游对传统村落的影响研究——以安徽齐云山为例[J].旅游学刊, 2012, 27(4):57-63.
[3]余汝艺,梁留科,李德明,等.旅游种群的入侵、继替与古村落空间秩序重组研究——以徽州古村落宏村为例[J].经济地理, 2013, 33(8):165-170.
[4]刘春腊,刘沛林.北京山区沟域经济建设背景下的古村落保护与开发研究[J].经济地理, 2011, 31(11):1923-1929.
[5]杨丽婷,曾祯.古村落保护与开发综合价值评价研究——以浙江省磐安县为例[J].地域研究与开发, 2013, 32(4):112-122.
[6]李枝秀.古村落保护模式研究——以江西为例[J].江西社会科学, 2012,(1):238-240.
[7]刘大均,胡静,陈君子,等.中国传统村落的空间分布格局研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(4):157-162.
[8]陶伟,陈红叶,林杰勇.句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J].地理学报, 2013, 68(2):209-218.
[9]邱丽,渠滔,张海.广东五邑地区传统村落的空间形态特征分析[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(5):547-550.
[2]李萍,王倩, Chris Ryan.旅游对传统村落的影响研究——以安徽齐云山为例[J].旅游学刊, 2012, 27(4):57-63.
[3]余汝艺,梁留科,李德明,等.旅游种群的入侵、继替与古村落空间秩序重组研究——以徽州古村落宏村为例[J].经济地理, 2013, 33(8):165-170.
[4]刘春腊,刘沛林.北京山区沟域经济建设背景下的古村落保护与开发研究[J].经济地理, 2011, 31(11):1923-1929.
[5]杨丽婷,曾祯.古村落保护与开发综合价值评价研究——以浙江省磐安县为例[J].地域研究与开发, 2013, 32(4):112-122.
[6]李枝秀.古村落保护模式研究——以江西为例[J].江西社会科学, 2012,(1):238-240.
[7]刘大均,胡静,陈君子,等.中国传统村落的空间分布格局研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(4):157-162.
[8]陶伟,陈红叶,林杰勇.句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J].地理学报, 2013, 68(2):209-218.
[9]邱丽,渠滔,张海.广东五邑地区传统村落的空间形态特征分析[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(5):547-550.