棉铃虫雌成虫对16种植物的产卵偏好性及幼虫取食后的生存表现
|
摘要
为研究棉铃虫成虫寄主偏好性和幼虫取食后生存表现之间的关系,明确两者在决定寄主过程中的作用,我们测定了交配后的棉铃虫雌成虫对16种植物(棉花、玉米、大豆、花生、番茄、辣椒、茄子、烟草、黄瓜、胡萝卜、西芹、杨树、月季、菠菜、包菜、大葱)的产卵偏好性和幼虫取食这些植物嫩叶后的存活和发育情况。棉铃虫雌成虫选择在烟草、茄子、棉花、胡萝卜、番茄、辣椒、玉米、西芹、大豆和花生等10种植物上产卵,但只有取食西芹、烟草、番茄、大豆、棉花和胡萝卜等6种植物叶片的初孵幼虫能够完成幼虫阶段的生长发育、化蛹并羽化,且取食植物嫩叶的幼虫的存活率、发育历期、蛹期和蛹重均差于取食人工饲料的幼虫。以上结果表明,棉铃虫雌成虫产卵寄主与其幼虫取食寄主之间存在并非一一对应的关系,幼虫的生存表现限定了棉铃虫的寄主范围。
To investigate the relationships between adult host preference and larval performance in Helicoverpa armigera and compare their roles in determining host plant range, we measured the oviposition preference of mated female adults of H. armigera to 16 plants(cotton, corn, soybean, peanut, tomato, pepper, eggplant, tobacco, cucumber, carrot, celery, poplar, Chinese rose, spinach, cabbage, and green onion) and the survival and development of H. armigera larvae fed with young leaves of the 16 plants. The female adults of H. armigera significantly selected tobacco, eggplant, cotton, carrot, tomato, pepper, corn, celery, soybean and peanut for laying eggs, whereas only neonates of H. armigera fed with young leaves of celery, tobacco, tomato, soybean, cotton, or carrot could complete larval development, pupate and emerge into adults. Moreover, the larvae fed with young leaves were inferior to those fed with artificial diets in survivorship, duration of larval stage, duration of pupal stage, and pupal weight. These results indicate an inclusive, rather than one-to-one relationship between adult oviposition and larval feeding, and larval performance ultimately determines the host range of H. armigera.
To investigate the relationships between adult host preference and larval performance in Helicoverpa armigera and compare their roles in determining host plant range, we measured the oviposition preference of mated female adults of H. armigera to 16 plants(cotton, corn, soybean, peanut, tomato, pepper, eggplant, tobacco, cucumber, carrot, celery, poplar, Chinese rose, spinach, cabbage, and green onion) and the survival and development of H. armigera larvae fed with young leaves of the 16 plants. The female adults of H. armigera significantly selected tobacco, eggplant, cotton, carrot, tomato, pepper, corn, celery, soybean and peanut for laying eggs, whereas only neonates of H. armigera fed with young leaves of celery, tobacco, tomato, soybean, cotton, or carrot could complete larval development, pupate and emerge into adults. Moreover, the larvae fed with young leaves were inferior to those fed with artificial diets in survivorship, duration of larval stage, duration of pupal stage, and pupal weight. These results indicate an inclusive, rather than one-to-one relationship between adult oviposition and larval feeding, and larval performance ultimately determines the host range of H. armigera.
引文
[1] 钦俊德, 王琛柱. 论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J]. 昆虫学报, 2001, 44(3): 360-365.
[2] BERNAYS E A.Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores [J]. Bioscience, 1998, 48(1): 35-44.
[3] 张泽彬, 马青, 黄金才, 等. 昆虫与植物协同进化的研究进展[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2010, 37(5): 60-62.
[4] SCHOONHOVEN L M, VAN LOON A, DICKE M. Insect-plant biology [M].New York:Oxford University Press Inc.,2005.
[5] EHRLICH P R, RAVEN P H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution [J]. Evolution, 1964, 18(4): 586-608.
[6] KAWECKI T J. Red queen meets Santa Rosalia: arms races and the evolution of host specialization in organisms with parasitic lifestyles [J].American Naturalist,1998,152(4):635-651.
[7] 翟宗昭, 葛斯琴, 杨星科. 跳甲的食性及食性分化[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(3): 407-417.
[8] BERNAYS E A.Neural limitations of phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and host affiliation [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2001, 46: 703-727.
[9] BERNAYS E A.Selective attention and host-plant specialization [C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Netherlands: Springer,1996:125-131.
[10] STEWART A J. Interspecific competition reinstated as an important force structuring insect herbivore communities[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996, 11(6): 233-234.
[11] BERNAYS E A.Relationship between deterrence and toxicity of plant secondary compounds for the grasshopper Schistocerca americana [J].Journal of Chemical Ecology,1991,17(12):2519-2526.
[12] BERNAYS E A, GRAHAM M. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods[J]. Ecology, 1988, 69(4): 886-892.
[13] THOMPSON J N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1988, 47(1): 3-14.
[14] 李旭颖. 植食性昆虫与寄主植物之间的相互关系和影响[J]. 科技创新导报, 2011(11): 130.
[15] FITT G P. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1989, 34(1): 17-53.
[16] MANJUNATH T M, BHATNAGAR V S, PAWAR C S, et al. Economic importance of Heliothis spp. in India and an assessment of their natural enemies and host plants[C]//The Workshop on Biological Control of Heliothis: Increasing the Effectiveness of Natural Enemies. 1989: 2143-2153.
[17] MITTER C, POOLE R W, MATTHEWS M. Biosystematics of the Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1993, 38(1): 207-226.
[18] ZALUCKI M P, MURRAY D, GREGG P C, et al. Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Heliothis punctigera (Wallengren) in the inland of Australia-larval sampling and host-plant relationships during winter and spring [J]. Australian Journal of Zoology, 1994, 42(3): 329-346.
[19] 张孝羲.棉铃虫种群猖獗的剖析[J].应用昆虫学报,1996,33(2):121-124.
[20] 柏立新,孙洪武,孙以文,等.棉铃虫寄主植物种类及其适合性程度[J].植物保护学报,1997,24(1):1-6.
[21] 吴明峰,高尚,杨耀,等.棉铃虫和烟青虫初孵幼虫对植物顶尖嫩叶的偏好性差异[J].植物保护,2016,42(3):63-69.
[22] JALLOW M F, MATSUMURA M, SUZUKI Y. Oviposition preference and reproductive performance of Japanese Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) [J]. Applied Entomology & Zoology, 2001, 36(4): 419-426.
[23] WANG C, DONG J, TANG D, et al. Host selection of Helicoverpa armigera and H. assulta and its inheritance [J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2004, 14(10): 880-884.
[24] JALLOW M F, ZALUCKI M P. Relationship between oviposition preference and offspring performance in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Austral Entomology, 2014, 42(4): 343-348.
[25] WIKLUND C. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon [J]. Oecologia, 1975, 18(3): 185-197.
[2] BERNAYS E A.Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores [J]. Bioscience, 1998, 48(1): 35-44.
[3] 张泽彬, 马青, 黄金才, 等. 昆虫与植物协同进化的研究进展[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2010, 37(5): 60-62.
[4] SCHOONHOVEN L M, VAN LOON A, DICKE M. Insect-plant biology [M].New York:Oxford University Press Inc.,2005.
[5] EHRLICH P R, RAVEN P H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution [J]. Evolution, 1964, 18(4): 586-608.
[6] KAWECKI T J. Red queen meets Santa Rosalia: arms races and the evolution of host specialization in organisms with parasitic lifestyles [J].American Naturalist,1998,152(4):635-651.
[7] 翟宗昭, 葛斯琴, 杨星科. 跳甲的食性及食性分化[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(3): 407-417.
[8] BERNAYS E A.Neural limitations of phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and host affiliation [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2001, 46: 703-727.
[9] BERNAYS E A.Selective attention and host-plant specialization [C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Netherlands: Springer,1996:125-131.
[10] STEWART A J. Interspecific competition reinstated as an important force structuring insect herbivore communities[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996, 11(6): 233-234.
[11] BERNAYS E A.Relationship between deterrence and toxicity of plant secondary compounds for the grasshopper Schistocerca americana [J].Journal of Chemical Ecology,1991,17(12):2519-2526.
[12] BERNAYS E A, GRAHAM M. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods[J]. Ecology, 1988, 69(4): 886-892.
[13] THOMPSON J N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1988, 47(1): 3-14.
[14] 李旭颖. 植食性昆虫与寄主植物之间的相互关系和影响[J]. 科技创新导报, 2011(11): 130.
[15] FITT G P. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1989, 34(1): 17-53.
[16] MANJUNATH T M, BHATNAGAR V S, PAWAR C S, et al. Economic importance of Heliothis spp. in India and an assessment of their natural enemies and host plants[C]//The Workshop on Biological Control of Heliothis: Increasing the Effectiveness of Natural Enemies. 1989: 2143-2153.
[17] MITTER C, POOLE R W, MATTHEWS M. Biosystematics of the Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1993, 38(1): 207-226.
[18] ZALUCKI M P, MURRAY D, GREGG P C, et al. Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Heliothis punctigera (Wallengren) in the inland of Australia-larval sampling and host-plant relationships during winter and spring [J]. Australian Journal of Zoology, 1994, 42(3): 329-346.
[19] 张孝羲.棉铃虫种群猖獗的剖析[J].应用昆虫学报,1996,33(2):121-124.
[20] 柏立新,孙洪武,孙以文,等.棉铃虫寄主植物种类及其适合性程度[J].植物保护学报,1997,24(1):1-6.
[21] 吴明峰,高尚,杨耀,等.棉铃虫和烟青虫初孵幼虫对植物顶尖嫩叶的偏好性差异[J].植物保护,2016,42(3):63-69.
[22] JALLOW M F, MATSUMURA M, SUZUKI Y. Oviposition preference and reproductive performance of Japanese Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) [J]. Applied Entomology & Zoology, 2001, 36(4): 419-426.
[23] WANG C, DONG J, TANG D, et al. Host selection of Helicoverpa armigera and H. assulta and its inheritance [J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2004, 14(10): 880-884.
[24] JALLOW M F, ZALUCKI M P. Relationship between oviposition preference and offspring performance in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Austral Entomology, 2014, 42(4): 343-348.
[25] WIKLUND C. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon [J]. Oecologia, 1975, 18(3): 185-197.