网约车法律规制的路径建构
|
摘要
网约车是"互联网+"时代兴起的典型共享经济代表,既有效缓解了城市交通压力,又满足了公众的实际需求,但由此引发的一系列社会问题和法律冲突不容忽视。中国虽然是世界上首个承认网约车合法地位的国家,但中国网约车在法律规制上还存在着立法空白、执法监管矛盾突出、司法延迟保守等多元困境。面对这一挑战,中国应以保护和规范网约车行业发展为目标,以加强网约车立法力度、创新行政监管模式、完善司法救济制度、推进与社会的协同发展为关键举措,以期建构科学的网约车法律规制路径,有效提升网约车治理的现代化水平,促进网约车在法治轨道上健康发展。
The online car-hailing service, as the typical representative of the sharing economy rising in the period of Internet plus, has been effectively relieving the pressure of urban traffic and meeting the actual demand of the public. However, a series of social problems and legal conflicts caused by it cannot be ignored. Although China is the first major country to legalize the online car-hailing service nationwide, there are many difficulties in process of legal regulation, such as legislative gaps, serious contradictions in law enforcement and supervision, and judicial delay and conservatism. In the face of this challenge, China should take the protection and standardization of the development of online car-hailing industry as the goal, strengthen its legislation, innovate the administrative supervision mode, improve the judicial relief system, and promote the coordinated development with the society, so as to construct a scientific legal regulation path for online car-hailing, effectively improve the modernization level of its governance, and promote its healthy development on the track of rule of law.
The online car-hailing service, as the typical representative of the sharing economy rising in the period of Internet plus, has been effectively relieving the pressure of urban traffic and meeting the actual demand of the public. However, a series of social problems and legal conflicts caused by it cannot be ignored. Although China is the first major country to legalize the online car-hailing service nationwide, there are many difficulties in process of legal regulation, such as legislative gaps, serious contradictions in law enforcement and supervision, and judicial delay and conservatism. In the face of this challenge, China should take the protection and standardization of the development of online car-hailing industry as the goal, strengthen its legislation, innovate the administrative supervision mode, improve the judicial relief system, and promote the coordinated development with the society, so as to construct a scientific legal regulation path for online car-hailing, effectively improve the modernization level of its governance, and promote its healthy development on the track of rule of law.
引文
[1]孙瑜晨.互联网共享经济监管模式的转型:迈向竞争导向型监管[J].河北法学,2018,(10):19.
[2]程琥.我国网约车监管中的法律价值冲突及其整合[J].环球法律评论,2018,(2):91.
[3]陈越峰.“互联网+”的规制结构——以“网约车”规制为例[J].法学家,2017,(1):23.
[4]张钺.共享经济的法律规制问题初探——以互联网专车为例[J].法制与社会,2017,(2):46.
[5]谢新水.网约车治理政策的制定过程分析:冲击、支持与合作思维[J].理论与改革,2017,(4):140.
[6]莫林.网约车规制策略转向:从整体管控到技术治理[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2018,(5):141.
[7]王静.中国网约车新政的变革方向[J].行政法学研究,2018,(4):116.
[8]黄锫.共享经济中行政许可设定的合法性问题研究——以《上海网约车新规》为分析对象[J].政法论丛,2017,(4):61.
[9]宋心然,张效羽.网约车地方规制细则成本收益分析:以北京市网约车规制细则为例[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(5):126.
[10]彭岳.共享经济的法律规制问题——以互联网专车为例[J].行政法学研究,2016,(1):125.
[11]顾莎.探究交通事故中网约车平台的侵权责任承担[J].法制与经济,2018,(11):27.
[2]程琥.我国网约车监管中的法律价值冲突及其整合[J].环球法律评论,2018,(2):91.
[3]陈越峰.“互联网+”的规制结构——以“网约车”规制为例[J].法学家,2017,(1):23.
[4]张钺.共享经济的法律规制问题初探——以互联网专车为例[J].法制与社会,2017,(2):46.
[5]谢新水.网约车治理政策的制定过程分析:冲击、支持与合作思维[J].理论与改革,2017,(4):140.
[6]莫林.网约车规制策略转向:从整体管控到技术治理[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2018,(5):141.
[7]王静.中国网约车新政的变革方向[J].行政法学研究,2018,(4):116.
[8]黄锫.共享经济中行政许可设定的合法性问题研究——以《上海网约车新规》为分析对象[J].政法论丛,2017,(4):61.
[9]宋心然,张效羽.网约车地方规制细则成本收益分析:以北京市网约车规制细则为例[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(5):126.
[10]彭岳.共享经济的法律规制问题——以互联网专车为例[J].行政法学研究,2016,(1):125.
[11]顾莎.探究交通事故中网约车平台的侵权责任承担[J].法制与经济,2018,(11):27.