吐哈盆地红连地区三间房组储层特征与成岩相
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Reservoir characteristics and diagenetic facies of the Sanjianfang Formation in Honglian area, Turpan-Hami Basin, China
  • 作者:李富祥 ; 徐胜林 ; 徐雄飞 ; 陈安清 ; 杨帅 ; 庞春雨 ; 陈璇
  • 英文作者:LI Fuxiang;XU Shenglin;XU Xiongfei;CHEN Anqing;YANG Shuai;PANG Chunyu;CHEN Xuan;State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploration, Chengdu University of Technology;Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Tuha Oil Field Branch Company Ltd.of PetroChina;
  • 关键词:吐哈盆地 ; 三间房组 ; 成岩作用 ; 成岩相
  • 英文关键词:Turpan-Hami Basin;;Sanjianfang Formation;;diagenesis;;diagenetic facies
  • 中文刊名:CDLG
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition)
  • 机构:油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学);中国石油吐哈油田公司勘探开发研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-04 16:15
  • 出版单位:成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.46;No.213
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41602107);; 成都理工大学中青年骨干教师培养计划项目(JXGG201537,JXGG201538)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CDLG201902005
  • 页数:9
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:51-1634/N
  • 分类号:45-53
摘要
吐哈盆地红连地区中侏罗统三间房组在油气资源方面具有巨大勘探潜力。以普通薄片、铸体薄片和扫描电镜等资料为基础,系统分析三间房组储层特征,开展成岩相研究。三间房组储层岩石类型主要有岩屑砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩;主要受压实作用、溶蚀作用、破裂作用和胶结作用等成岩作用影响;发育有6种成岩相类型,其中环边绿泥石胶结-硅质、高岭石充填-剩余原生粒间孔成岩相,高岭石、伊利石充填-石英次生加大-溶蚀孔、剩余原生粒间孔成岩相和高岭石、伊利石充填-剩余原生粒间孔成岩相是较有利的成岩相类型。
        The oil and gas resources of the Middle Jurassic Sanjianfang Formation in the Honglian area of Turpan-Hami Basin have great exploration potential. Based on the data of ordinary thin section and cast thin section observation and scanning electron microscopy analysis, the reservoir characteristics of the Sanjianfang Formation and diagenetic facies are systematically analyzed. The research shows that the Sanjianfang Formation reservoir sandstones are mainly composed of lithic sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone. The sandstones are affected by 4 kinds of diagenesis, such as compaction, dissolution, fracturing and cementation. Microscopic study reveals that there are six major types of diagenetic facies in the sandstones. Among them, the early chlorite ring, cementation, dissolution and fracturing improve the physical properties of reservoir, while the dominant diagenesis of compaction plays a destructive role in the formation of reservoir. The diagenetic facies of chlorite rim cementation-siliceous-kaolinite filling-remaining primary intergranular pore, kaolinite & illite filling-quartz overgrowth-dissolved pore-remnant primary intergranular pore and kaolinite & illite filling-remaining primary intergranular pore are favorable ones for the formation of hydrocarbon resources.
引文
[1] 袁明生.吐哈盆地油气分布特征及勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质,1998,19(2):106-111.Yuan M S. Oil-gas distribution characteristics and exploration strategy in Turpan-Hami Basin [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1998, 19(2): 106-111. (in Chinese)
    [2] 李新宁,雷振,卿中.吐哈盆地近期有利勘探方向探讨[J].吐哈油气,2007,12(4):232-236.Li X N, Lei Z, Qing Z. Discussion on recent preferential exploration target in Tuha Basin [J]. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2007, 12(4): 232-236. (in Chinese)
    [3] 纪友亮,冷胜荣.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系沉积特征研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(6):8-15.Ji Y L, Leng S R. Sedimentary environment and facies of Jurassic in Taibei Depression of Tuha Basin [J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science), 1995, 19(6): 8-15. (in Chinese)
    [4] 郭精义,杨占龙,于均民,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系层序地层划分[J].天然气工业,2005,8(4):60-63.Guo J Y, Yang Z L, Yu J M, et al. Sequence stratigraphic division of the Jurassic in Taibei Depression of Tuha Basin [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 8(4): 60-63. (in Chinese)
    [5] 肖冬生,陈旋,文川江,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷胜北构造带油气成藏新认识[J].特征油气藏,2016,23(3):21-26.Xiao D S, Chen X, Wen C J, et al. New insights into hydrocarbon accumulation of Shengbei structural zone in Taibei Depression of Tuha Basin [J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23(3): 21-26. (in Chinese)
    [6] 杨占龙.吐哈盆地台北凹陷天然气成藏条件与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(5):688-692.Yang Z L. Accumulation condition and exploration domains of natural gas, Taibei Depression, Tuha Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geology, 2006, 17(5): 688-692. (in Chinese)
    [7] 吴青鹏,杨占龙,李红哲,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷西缘侏罗系层序划分及沉积体系演化[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(3):348-356.Wu Q P, Yang Z L, Li H Z, et al. Sequence division, distribution and evolution of sedimentary facies of Jurassic System, Western Taibei Sag, Turpan-Hami Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geology, 2009, 20(3): 348-356. (in Chinese)
    [8] 赵虹,党犇,陈永胜,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系储层砂体发育及其岩石学特征[J].西安科技大学学报,2007,27(3):386-391.Zhao H, Dang B, Chen Y S, et al. Sandstone bodies and their petrology characteristics of Jurassic reservoirs in Taibei Depression of Tuha Basin [J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2007, 27(3): 386-391. (in Chinese)
    [9] 王新民,赵应成.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系油气富集地质条件及油气分布规律[J].地球科学进展,1998,13(4):344-350. Wang X M, Zhao Y C. The geologic condition of petroleum accumulation and dispersion regularity of the Taibei Depression of the Tuha Basin [J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1998, 13(4): 344-350. (in Chinese)
    [10] 肖冬生,陈旋,杨帅,等.新疆红连地区七克台组储层成岩作用与成岩相[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2016,43(6):648-655.Xiao D S, Chen X, Yang S, et al. Diagenesis and diagenesis facies of the Qiketai Formation in Honglian area, Xinjiang, China [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(6): 648-655. (in Chinese)
    [11] 张金亮,李德勇,司学强.惠民凹陷孔店组末端扇沉积及其储层特征[J].沉积学报,2011,20(1):1-13.Zhang J L, Li D Y, Si X Q. Deposition and reservoir characteristics of terminal fan in Kongdian Formation of Huimin Depression [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)
    [12] 陶明信.论新疆吐哈盆地的两种构造单元体系[J].地质通报,2010,29(2/3):298-305.Tao M X. The two kinds of tectonic unit systems in Turpan-Hami Basin, Xinjiang, China [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, 29(2/3): 298-305. (in Chinese)
    [13] 吴青鹏,倪联斌,吕锡敏,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷西部侏罗系-古、新近系沉积体系与演化[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2009,29(1):84-91.Wu Q P, Ni L B, Lv X M, et al. Distribution and evolution of the Jurassic-Plaeogne-Neogene sedimentary systems in western Taibei depression, Turpan-Hami Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2009, 29(1): 84-91. (in Chinese)
    [14] 李文厚,柳益群,冯乔,等.台北凹陷中侏罗统辫状河三角洲沉积体系与油气的关系[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),1997,27(3):247-252.Li W H, Liu Y Q, Feng Q, et al. The relations between braided delta depositional system and hydrocarbon resources in Taibei Sag [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 1997, 27(3): 247-252. (in Chinese)
    [15] 刘林玉,柳益群,李文厚,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷三角洲沉积与成岩作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):402-405.Liu L Y, Liu Y Q, Li W H, et al. Sedimentation and diagenesis of delta in Taibei Sag of Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(4): 402-405. (in Chinese)
    [16] 曾允孚,夏文杰.沉积岩石学[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.Zeng Y F, Xia W J. Sedimentary Petrology [M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1986. (in Chinese)
    [17] Ehrenberg S N. Preservation of anomalously high porosity in deeply buried sandstones by grain-coating chlorite: Examples from the Norwegian Continental Shelf[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, 77(7): 1260-1286.
    [18] 王芙蓉,何生,何治亮,等.准噶尔盆地腹部永进地区深埋侏罗系砂岩内绿泥石包膜对储层物性的影响[J]. 大庆石油学院学报,2007,11(4):24-28.Wang F R, He S, He Z L, et al. Effect of gain-coating chlorite on reservoir property of Yongjin area in the centre of Junggar Basin [J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2007, 11(4): 24-28. (in Chinese)
    [19] 田建锋,陈振林,杨友运.自生绿泥石对砂岩储层孔隙的保护机理[J].地质科技情报,2008,27(4):49-54.Tian J F, Chen Z L, Yang Y Y, et al. Protection mechanism of authigenic chlorite on sandstone reservoir pores [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008, 27(4): 49-54. (in Chinese)
    [20] 姚泾利,王琪,张瑞,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组长6 砂岩绿泥石膜的形成机理及其环境指示意义[J].沉积学报,2011,29(1):72-79.Yao J L, Wang Q, Zhang R, et al. Forming mechanism and their environmental implications of chlorite-coatings in Chang 6 sandstone (Upper Triassic) of Hua-Qing area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(1): 72-79. (in Chinese)
    [21] 朱晓燕,田随良,刘建勋,等.鄂尔多斯盆地环县-西峰地区延长组长9 油层组自生绿泥石发育特征研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2014,34(2):54-59. Zhu X Y, Tian S L, Liu J X, et al. Development of the authigenic chlorite in the Chang-9 oil measures of the Yanchang Formation in the Huanxian-Xifeng region, Ordos Basin [J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2014, 34(2): 54-59. (in Chinese)
    [22] 谭谦.姬塬北地区长8油层组储集砂体发育特征及有利储层预测[D].成都:成都理工大学档案馆,2013. Tan Q. The Characteristics of Reservoir Sand Body Development and Advantageous Region Prediction in Chang 8 Formation in North of Jiyuan Area[D]. Chengdu: The Archive of Chengdu University of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
    [23] 赖锦,王贵文,王书南,等.碎屑岩储层成岩相研究现状及进展[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(1):39-50.Lai J, Wang G W, Wang S N, et al. Research status and advances in the diagenetic facies of clastic reservoirs [J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2013, 28(1): 39-50. (in Chinese)
    [24] 赖锦,王贵文,信毅,等.库车坳陷巴什基奇克组致密砂岩气储层成岩相分析[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1019-1032. Lai J, Wang G W, Xin Y, et al. Diagenetic facies analysis of tight sandstone gas reservoir of Bashijiqike Formation in Kuche Depression [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(7): 1019-1032. (in Chinese)
    [25] 王峰,陈蓉,田景春,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长4+5油层组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及成岩相[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):199-206. Wang F, Chen R, Tian J C, et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of the Chang 4+5 tight sandstone reservoirs in Longdong area, Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2): 199-206. (in Chinese)