侵害个人信息权的法律责任:法理融贯与立法比较

英文篇名：Legal Responsibilities for Infringing upon Personal Information Rights: Comprehensive Legal Theory and Legislative Comparison
作者：高志明
英文作者：GAO Zhiming;Department of Law, Yanshan University;
关键词：侵害个人信息权 ; 法律责任 ; 法理融贯 ; 立法比较
英文关键词：personal information rights infringment;;legal responsibilities;;comprehensive legal theory;;legislative comparison
中文刊名：DLGD
英文刊名：Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
机构：燕山大学法学系;
出版日期：2018-10-23 11:23
出版单位：大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)
年：2019
期：v.40;No.161
基金：河北省社会科学发展研究课题:“个人信息保护多元机制研究”(201604030102)
语种：中文;
页：DLGD201901009
页数：7
CN：01
ISSN：21-1383/C
分类号：69-75

摘要

侵害个人信息权的行为威胁信息人格利益与财产利益的安全,在中国进行统一的个人信息安全法律制度设计中,须跨越部门法律的藩篱,对侵害个人信息权的法律责任进行法理融通,以期形成整体性的"两层次"责任理论体系,同时,对境外立法进行比较分析,以期形成综合性的权利救济体系。
The infringement upon the right of personal information threats the security of personal information and property. However, to draft a consistent legal regulation regarding personal information security in China, we have to overcome legal barriers arising from uncoordinated branches of the legal system and draw up a comprehensive legal system to cope with the infringement of personal information so that an integrated two-stage responsibility framework can be formulated. Meanwhile, a comparative analysis of the foreign legislations and those in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regarding personal information infringement may also shed some light on a comprehensive rights relief system.

引文

[1] 艾围利. 论侵权责任减免中的亲属身份考量[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,37(3):130-136.
    [2] 徐昕. 论私力救济[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005. 347-349.
    [3] LUDINGTON S. Reining in the data traders:a tort for the misuse of personal information[J]. Maryland Law Review,2006(66):140-193.
    [4] 王利明. 人格权法研究[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:298.
    [5] 王利明. 隐私权概念的再界定[J]. 法学家,2012(1):108-120,178.