贵州鼠害控制项目农民田间学校实施效果与建议
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effectiveness and Suggestions on the Implementation of Guizhou Rodent Pest Control Project in Farmers' Field Schools
  • 作者:杨再学 ; 周朝霞 ; 尹文书 ; 李恩涛 ; 艾祯仙 ; 田勇 ; 白智江 ; 肖卫平 ; 李梅 ; 陆晓欢 ; 许兴亮 ; 罗全丽 ; 谈孝凤
  • 英文作者:YANG Zai-xue;ZhOU Zhao-xia;YIN Wen-shu;LI En-tao;AI Zhen-xian;TIAN Yong;BAI Zhi-jiang;XIAO Wei-ping;LI Me;LU Xiao-huan;XU Xing-liang;LUO Quan-li;TAN Xiao-feng;Guizhou Yuqing Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Duyun Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Xifeng Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Wengan Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Sandu Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Cengong Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Qiannan Plant Protection Station;Guizhou Plant Protection Station;
  • 关键词:鼠害控制 ; 农民田间学校 ; 实施效果 ; 建议 ; 贵州省
  • 英文关键词:rodent management;;farmer field school;;conduction effect;;advices;;Guizhou province
  • 中文刊名:SDNS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology
  • 机构:贵州省余庆县植保植检站;贵州省都匀市植保植检站;贵州省息烽县植保植检站;贵州省瓮安县植保植检站;贵州省三都县植保植检站;贵州省岑巩县植保植检站;贵州省黔南州植保植检站;贵州省植保植检站;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 出版单位:山地农业生物学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.166
  • 基金:联合国粮农组织(FAO)技术合作项目“贵州鼠害控制减少粮食损失保护农业生态安全项目”(TCP/CPR/3608);; 贵州省高层次创新型人才培养项目“贵州省高层次创新型人才“百”层次(鼠害人才团队)培养项目”(黔科合人才[2015]4019号)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SDNS201901010
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:52-5013/S
  • 分类号:56-61+97
摘要
2018年4~10月,在贵州省余庆县、三都县、息烽县、瓮安县、岑巩县、都匀市举办了联合国粮农组织(FAO)贵州鼠害控制减少粮食损失保护农业生态安全项目农民田间学校(FFS)15间,培训农民451人,培训采用FAO推荐的参与式、启发式、互动式、成人非正规教育方式进行,学员能力得到明显提升,测试题总体正确率由培训前的75.40%提高到培训后的93.36%;学员对培训过程充分认可,学员非常满意为96.07%,满意率为3.93%;FFS质量控制指标完成良好。为使鼠害控制FFS得到长足发展,不断提高鼠害防控能力,在今后举办FFS时,培训时间与农事活动需要合理协调,培训课程设置需要不断完善,灭鼠技术培训需要长期坚持,培训经费需要加大支持力度。
        We held 15 Farmer Field Schools(FFSs) in Yuqing, Sandu, Xifeng, Weng'an, Cengong and Duyun counties(cities) of Guizhou Province from April to October 2018, which is one of the main contents of a FAO project of "Reducing food loss and improving agricultural ecology based pest rodent management in Guizhou Province". A total of 450 farmers were trained through a participatory training and adult non-formal education style introduced by the project. The scores of ballot box test increased from 75.40 for the pre-training participants to 93.36 for the trained farmers, which suggested the participants' ability were obvious improved. At the end of the training, a survey was conduct for examining trainees' satisfaction. The results showed trainees were very satisfied with the training process. Generally, high satisfaction rate was 96.07%, and the common satisfaction rate was 3.93%. A survey of quality control indexes for the training also showed a fine effect. In order to further improve the level of FFS in the future, we have the following advices: coordinate training time of FFS and farming activity time; better curriculums of FFS should be developed; the training of rodent management knowledge and technologies need insist for a long time and more funds should be provided for the training.
引文
[1] 夏敬源,杨普云,朱恩林. 农业技术推广模式的重大创新——农民田间学校(FFS)[J]中国植保导刊,2004,24(12):83-86.
    [2] 杨普云. 农民田间学校概论——参与式农民培训方法与管理[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008:1-11.
    [3] 朱晓明,杨普云. 农民田间学校在中国的实践与创新发展[J].中国植保导刊,2018,38(9):83-86.
    [4] 杨再学,李学琳,谈孝凤. 贵州鼠害控制项目农民田间学校辅导员培训成效及建议[J].中国植保导刊,2018,38(11):85-87.
    [5] Arnoud B, Janice J, Niels R A. Global Survey and Review of Farmer Field School Experiences [R].Wageningen:Endelea,2006.
    [6] 金星,杨再学,刘晋,等. 贵州省毒饵站灭鼠技术的研究与应用[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(9):107-112.
    [7] 李恩涛,周全忠,余文芹,等. 不同材料毒饵站防治农区害鼠效果对比试验[J].现代农业科技,2016,(13):146,148.
    [8] 杨再学,郭永旺,金星,等. TBS技术监测及控制农田害鼠效果初报[J].山地农业生物学报,2012,31(4):301-306.
    [9] 韦应敏,留青,杨德辉,等. 开放式和封闭式TBS捕鼠效果观察[J].山地农业生物学报,2016,35(2):35-38.
    [10] 杨再学,谈孝凤. 贵州省TBS灭鼠技术规范及应用前景[J].山地农业生物学报,2018,37(3):56-61.
    [11] 杨再学. 常用捕鼠器械的种类及使用方法[J]. 农技服务,2004,(9):49-50.
    [12] 杨再学,金星. 贵州省农区鼠害监测结果与灾变规律分析[J].山地农业生物学报,2006,25(3):197-202.