监察体制改革背景下监察委调查权与职务犯罪侦查模式变革研究
|
摘要
监察委员会调查权具有集合行政、纪委、检察等多重职务犯罪侦查权的特点,但与上述权力存在诸多区别。尽管调查权的适用对象限于职务违法行为和职务犯罪行为,与刑事诉讼侦查权极为相似,但监察委员会调查权的行使并不适用《刑事诉讼法》,相反,其法律依据是《国家监察法》。在司法适用层面上,关于监察委员会调查权的制度设计,难以有效置于刑事诉讼侦查权运行框架之中,尚存在必要的完善。有鉴于此,为消除调查权运行中可能面临的法治风险,当务之急是要检视《国家监察法》中调查权与《刑事诉讼法》中侦查权的关系,构建从法律文本转化为司法实践之路径,以期与司法程序无缝衔接,进而在法治中国的轨道上实现调查权的有序运转。
The investigative power of supervisory commission has the characteristics of collecting administrative,disciplinary and procuratorial powers.Although its investigation object is limited to duty violations and duty crimes,which is similar to the power of criminal investigation.The exercise of the power of investigation by the supervisory commission does not apply to the criminal procedure law.On the contrary,its legal basis is the law of state supervision.On the application of judicial practice,the system design of the investigation power of the supervisory commission is difficult to be placed in the framework of the criminal investigation power effectively.Besides,there is still a long way to go.For this reason,to eliminate the rule of law in the operation of such possible investigations risk,it is necessary to examine the national inspection act enforcement power in the relationship with the indictment in the criminal procedure law and build from the legal text into the effective path of judicial practice.Furthermore,seamlessly connect with the judicial process and realize the orderly operation of the investigation right on the track of the rule of law in China
The investigative power of supervisory commission has the characteristics of collecting administrative,disciplinary and procuratorial powers.Although its investigation object is limited to duty violations and duty crimes,which is similar to the power of criminal investigation.The exercise of the power of investigation by the supervisory commission does not apply to the criminal procedure law.On the contrary,its legal basis is the law of state supervision.On the application of judicial practice,the system design of the investigation power of the supervisory commission is difficult to be placed in the framework of the criminal investigation power effectively.Besides,there is still a long way to go.For this reason,to eliminate the rule of law in the operation of such possible investigations risk,it is necessary to examine the national inspection act enforcement power in the relationship with the indictment in the criminal procedure law and build from the legal text into the effective path of judicial practice.Furthermore,seamlessly connect with the judicial process and realize the orderly operation of the investigation right on the track of the rule of law in China
引文
[1]吴建雄.监察体制改革试点视域下监察委员会职权的配置与运行规范[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,39(05):44-53+2.
[2]陈光中,邵俊.我国监察体制改革若干问题思考[J].中国法学,2017,(04):23-36.
[3]熊秋红.监察体制改革中职务犯罪侦查权比较研究[J].环球法律评论,2017,39(02):40-60.
[4]施鹏鹏.国家监察委员会的侦查权及其限制[J].中国法律评论,2017,(02):44-50.
[5]刘艳红.监察委员会调查权运作的双重困境及其法治路径[J].法学论坛,2017,32(06):5-15.
[6]戴涛.监察体制改革背景下调查权与侦查权研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2018,(01):92-96+150-151.
[7]左卫民,安琪.监察委员会调查权:性质、行使与规制的审思[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(01):100-105.
[8]郭夏菁.论国家监察体制改革下的职务犯罪侦查监督[J].南海法学,2017,1(03):72-81.
[9]童之伟.将监察体制改革全程纳入法治轨道之方略[J].法学,2016,(12):3-13.
[10]郑贤君.试论监察委员会之调查权[J].中国法律评论,2017,(04):111-121.
[11]白皓,杨强强.国家监察体制改革进路研究[J].河北法学,2017,35(05):143-153.
[12]汪海燕.监察制度与《刑事诉讼法》的衔接[J].政法论坛,2017,35(06):84-95.
[13]刘艳红,夏伟.法治反腐视域下国家监察体制改革的新路径[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(01):89-99.
[14]秦前红,刘怡达.监察全面覆盖的可能与限度——兼论监察体制改革的宪法边界[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2017,(02):17-26.
[15]谢登科.论国家监察体制改革下的侦诉关系[J].学习与探索,2018,(01):72-78.
[16]杨建顺.国家监察体制改革十大课题[J].中国法律评论,2017,(06):55-79.
[2]陈光中,邵俊.我国监察体制改革若干问题思考[J].中国法学,2017,(04):23-36.
[3]熊秋红.监察体制改革中职务犯罪侦查权比较研究[J].环球法律评论,2017,39(02):40-60.
[4]施鹏鹏.国家监察委员会的侦查权及其限制[J].中国法律评论,2017,(02):44-50.
[5]刘艳红.监察委员会调查权运作的双重困境及其法治路径[J].法学论坛,2017,32(06):5-15.
[6]戴涛.监察体制改革背景下调查权与侦查权研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2018,(01):92-96+150-151.
[7]左卫民,安琪.监察委员会调查权:性质、行使与规制的审思[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(01):100-105.
[8]郭夏菁.论国家监察体制改革下的职务犯罪侦查监督[J].南海法学,2017,1(03):72-81.
[9]童之伟.将监察体制改革全程纳入法治轨道之方略[J].法学,2016,(12):3-13.
[10]郑贤君.试论监察委员会之调查权[J].中国法律评论,2017,(04):111-121.
[11]白皓,杨强强.国家监察体制改革进路研究[J].河北法学,2017,35(05):143-153.
[12]汪海燕.监察制度与《刑事诉讼法》的衔接[J].政法论坛,2017,35(06):84-95.
[13]刘艳红,夏伟.法治反腐视域下国家监察体制改革的新路径[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(01):89-99.
[14]秦前红,刘怡达.监察全面覆盖的可能与限度——兼论监察体制改革的宪法边界[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2017,(02):17-26.
[15]谢登科.论国家监察体制改革下的侦诉关系[J].学习与探索,2018,(01):72-78.
[16]杨建顺.国家监察体制改革十大课题[J].中国法律评论,2017,(06):55-79.