大学行政权力适用边界探究
|
摘要
文章通过对中国语境下大学行政权力生成的法理基础、大学行政权力的显著特征与核心构成等问题解析,以大学行政权力的公益性、扩张性、强制性为切入点,概括了大学行政权力五个内涵层面,并提出大学行政权力行使的不当性可能及权力过度集中所带来的资源诉求环境上的异化可能、权力肆意滥用所带来的资源和力量内耗的可能等两类表现形式和负面影响,在此基础上提出大学行政权力的应然性结构安排。
Based on the analysis of the legal basis of the formation of university administrative power in Chinese context, the prominent characteristics and core composition of university administrative power, this paper takes the commonweal, expansionary and compulsory nature of university administrative power as the starting point,and summarizes the five connotations of university administrative power, and puts forward the possibility of improper exercise of university administrative power and the possibility of alienation in the environment of resource appeal brought by excessive concentration of power. There are two forms of expression and negative effects, such as the possibility of internal friction of resources and forces brought about by wanton abuse of power, and on the basis of which, the necessary structural arrangement of university administrative power is put forward.
Based on the analysis of the legal basis of the formation of university administrative power in Chinese context, the prominent characteristics and core composition of university administrative power, this paper takes the commonweal, expansionary and compulsory nature of university administrative power as the starting point,and summarizes the five connotations of university administrative power, and puts forward the possibility of improper exercise of university administrative power and the possibility of alienation in the environment of resource appeal brought by excessive concentration of power. There are two forms of expression and negative effects, such as the possibility of internal friction of resources and forces brought about by wanton abuse of power, and on the basis of which, the necessary structural arrangement of university administrative power is put forward.
引文
[1][法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].李平沤,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:14.
[2]王人博,程燎原.法治论[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2001:57.
[3]宋伟.大学组织行政权力生成的哲学基础[J].清华大学教育研究,2005(4):26.
[4][5]李从浩.中国大学行政权力的合法性限度[J].高等教育研究,2012(5):18,18.
[6]韩水法.世上已无蔡元培[J].读书,2005(4):3.
[7]高赟,王晓丽.大学政治权力、行政权力、学术权力的关系及协调[J].甘肃政法成人教育学院学报,2007(1).
[8]黄炳辉.行政权力在大学制度中的角色定位及优化策略[J].江苏高教,2008(2):42.
[9][法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神:上册[M].张雁深,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:154.
[10]高鸿钧.现代法治的出路[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003:217.
[11][德]施米特.政治的神学[M].刘宗坤,等,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:402.
[2]王人博,程燎原.法治论[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2001:57.
[3]宋伟.大学组织行政权力生成的哲学基础[J].清华大学教育研究,2005(4):26.
[4][5]李从浩.中国大学行政权力的合法性限度[J].高等教育研究,2012(5):18,18.
[6]韩水法.世上已无蔡元培[J].读书,2005(4):3.
[7]高赟,王晓丽.大学政治权力、行政权力、学术权力的关系及协调[J].甘肃政法成人教育学院学报,2007(1).
[8]黄炳辉.行政权力在大学制度中的角色定位及优化策略[J].江苏高教,2008(2):42.
[9][法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神:上册[M].张雁深,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:154.
[10]高鸿钧.现代法治的出路[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003:217.
[11][德]施米特.政治的神学[M].刘宗坤,等,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:402.