环境权探索及其保护进路
|
摘要
环境问题从人类进入工业社会以来便一直与人类社会发展相伴随,且愈加严重,环境权由此成为学界关注的热点。环境权是宪法权利还是具体权利,环境权的主体、客体、内容为何?环境权与其他权利的界限如何划定?可谓众说纷纭,尚不能明确回答。但环境之保护无暇坐看百家争鸣,可退而次之,通过公民提起环境公益诉讼的方式暂时弥补环境权定性不明带来的维权缺位问题,实现环境权益的保护救济并向环境权的直接保护过渡。
Environmental problems have been associated with the development of human society since the beginning of the industrial society, and the environmental right has become a hot topic in academic circles. Environmental right is the constitutional rights or specific rights? What's its subject, object and content of environmental right? How to delimit the limits of environmental right and other rights? All these are controversial and cannot be answered. But we have no time to sit watching the contention of a hundred schools of thought. We should temporarily make up the vacancy of rights protection caused by the uncertainty of environmental by the way of conducting environmental public interest litigation by citizens, so as to achieve the protection and relief of environmental of rights and change over to the direct protection of the environment right.
Environmental problems have been associated with the development of human society since the beginning of the industrial society, and the environmental right has become a hot topic in academic circles. Environmental right is the constitutional rights or specific rights? What's its subject, object and content of environmental right? How to delimit the limits of environmental right and other rights? All these are controversial and cannot be answered. But we have no time to sit watching the contention of a hundred schools of thought. We should temporarily make up the vacancy of rights protection caused by the uncertainty of environmental by the way of conducting environmental public interest litigation by citizens, so as to achieve the protection and relief of environmental of rights and change over to the direct protection of the environment right.
引文
[1]特朗普宣布美国退出《巴黎协定》[EB/OL].(2017-06-02)[2019-02-18].http://news.cctv.com/2017/06/02/ARTITwZxxyhF ecWddzvSGkYa170602.shtml.
[2]朱春玉.环境法律关系新解[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,51(6):26-31.
[3]胡静.环境权的规范效力:可诉性和具体化[J].中国法学,2017(5):152-172.
[4]陈海嵩.论程序性环境权[J].华东政法大学学报,2015,18(1):103-112.
[5]DAVID R.BOYD.The environmental rights revolution:A global study of constitutions,human rights,and the environmental,at279[M].Vancouver:UBC Press,2012.
[6]陈海嵩.环境权实证效力之考察:以宪法环境权为中心[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):10-17.
[7]赖虹宇.环境权入宪的规范模式:选择及其实现[J].北京行政学院学报,2018(6):84-92.
[8]杨曦.渐进主义视野中环境权利的发展路径[J].西部法学评论,2018(6):53-63.
[9]蔡守秋.论环境权[J].金陵法律评论,2002(1):83-119.
[10]蔡守秋.从环境权到国家环境保护义务和环境公益诉讼[J].现代法学,2013,35(6):3-21.
[11]王树义,李华琪.也谈环境权利的可诉性[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,45(5):120-127.
[12]肖建国.肖建国.民事公益诉讼的基本模式研究——以中、美、德三国为中心的比较法考察[J].中国法学,2007(5):129-146.
[2]朱春玉.环境法律关系新解[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,51(6):26-31.
[3]胡静.环境权的规范效力:可诉性和具体化[J].中国法学,2017(5):152-172.
[4]陈海嵩.论程序性环境权[J].华东政法大学学报,2015,18(1):103-112.
[5]DAVID R.BOYD.The environmental rights revolution:A global study of constitutions,human rights,and the environmental,at279[M].Vancouver:UBC Press,2012.
[6]陈海嵩.环境权实证效力之考察:以宪法环境权为中心[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):10-17.
[7]赖虹宇.环境权入宪的规范模式:选择及其实现[J].北京行政学院学报,2018(6):84-92.
[8]杨曦.渐进主义视野中环境权利的发展路径[J].西部法学评论,2018(6):53-63.
[9]蔡守秋.论环境权[J].金陵法律评论,2002(1):83-119.
[10]蔡守秋.从环境权到国家环境保护义务和环境公益诉讼[J].现代法学,2013,35(6):3-21.
[11]王树义,李华琪.也谈环境权利的可诉性[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,45(5):120-127.
[12]肖建国.肖建国.民事公益诉讼的基本模式研究——以中、美、德三国为中心的比较法考察[J].中国法学,2007(5):129-146.