巴基斯坦政府门户网站公众初始接受的影响因素研究——基于使用意向和执行意向双重视角
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influential Factors of the Initial Public Acceptance of Pakistan Government Websites: Dual Perspectives Based on Use Intention and Implementation Intention
  • 作者:Irfan ; Ali ; Shah ; 王芳
  • 英文作者:Irfan Ali Shah;Wang Fang;Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University;Center for Network Society Governance, Nankai University;
  • 关键词:政府网站 ; 使用意向 ; 执行意向 ; 中介作用
  • 英文关键词:government website;;user intention;;implementation intention;;mediating effect
  • 中文刊名:QBXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
  • 机构:南开大学商学院信息资源管理系;南开大学网络社会治理研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-24
  • 出版单位:情报学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国网络社会治理研究”(14ZDA063)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QBXB201905010
  • 页数:14
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-2257/G3
  • 分类号:101-114
摘要
目前巴基斯坦政府网站的公众使用还处于起步阶段。提高政府门户网站的公众初始接受度,是巴基斯坦政府发展电子政务、提高公信力、打造便民政府的关键举措,探索公众对政府网站初始采纳的影响因素具有重要意义。本研究从使用意向和执行意向双重视角重新审视传统的技术接受模型。研究结果表明,执行意向在实际行为形成过程中发挥显著的直接效应,同时通过中介效应提升使用意向对实际行为的解释力;情景线索对于执行意向具有显著正向作用。研究结果对于巴基斯坦深化政府电子政务服务、建设服务型政府网站具有理论指导意义,同时也在理论上深化了政府网站采纳的理论研究。
        Improving the initial acceptance of government websites and developing government websites are key mea‐sures taken by the Pakistani government to develop e-government, enhance public credibility, and build a convenient gov‐ernment. Therefore, it is important to explore the factors that influence the initial adoption of government websites by the public. To detail the research, this study adopts the dual-perspectives of user intention and implementation intention. The research results show that the implementation intention has direct effect on the actual use action as well as intermediary ef‐fect between the use intention and the actual behavior, and the situation clues have significant influence on the implementa‐tion intention. The research findings have theoretical guiding significance for Pakistan to deepen the development of e-gov‐ernment services and build service-oriented government websites. Meanwhile, it will further expand theoretical research on the use of government websites.
引文
[1] Gil-Garcia J R. Enacting state websites:A mixed method, explor-ing e-government success in multi-organizational settings[C]//Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society,2006, 4:76.2.
    [2]王芳,王向女,周平平.地方政府网站信息公开能力评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].情报科学, 2011(3):406-411.
    [3]马亮.公民使用政府网站的影响因素:中国大城市的调查研究[J].电子政务, 2014(4):34-48.
    [4] Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations. Egovernment survey 2018[EB/OL].[2018-07-01]. https://publicad-ministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2018-Survey/E-Government%20Survey%202018%20Preliminary%20pages.pdf.
    [5]阿什法奎·马哈茂德.巴基斯坦电子政务计划(2002年5月[EB/OL].[2018-07-01]. http://www.docin.com/p-584717554.html.
    [6] E government in Pakistan:Challenges&road map to success[EB/OL].[2018-08-30]. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/egovernment-in-pakistan.php?vref=1.
    [7]杨道玲,王璟璇,李祥丽.“一带一路”沿线国家信息基础设施发展水平评估报告[J].电子政务, 2016(9):2-15.
    [8] United Nations e-government survey 2018[EB/OL].[2018-08-10]. https://publicadministration. un. org/egovkb/portals/egovkb/documents/un/2018-survey/e-government%20survey%202018_fi-nal%20for%20web.pdf.
    [9] Agaiwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you are having fun cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology us-age[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(4):665-694.
    [10] Javid M A, Arfeen M I. Impact of e-government on citizen satis-faction:A case of federal government agencies in Pakistan[C]//Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems. Heidelberg:Springer, 2017:221-237.
    [11] Wang F. Explaining the low utilization of government websites:Using a grounded theory approach[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2014, 31(4):610-621.
    [12] Wang F, Chen Y. From potential users to actual users:Use of egovernment service by Chinese migrant farmer workers[J]. Gov-ernment Information Quarterly, 2012, 29(Supplement 1):S98-S111.
    [13]边鹏.技术接受模型研究综述[J].图书馆学研究, 2012(1):2-6, 10.
    [14] Kim H W, Kankanhalli A. Investigating user resistance to infor-mation systems implementation:A status quo bias perspective[J].Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2009, 33(3):567-582.
    [15] van Raaij E M, Schepers J J L. The acceptance and use of a virtu-al learning environment in China[J]. Computers&Education,2008, 50(3):838-852.
    [16] Warkentin M, Gelen D, Pavlou P A, et al. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust[J]. Electronic Mar-kets, 2002, 12(3):157-162.
    [17] Wu I L, Chen J L. An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax:An empirical study[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2005, 62(6):784-808.
    [18] Barnes S J. The mobile commerce value chain:Analysis and fu-ture developments[J]. International Journal of Information Man-agement, 2002, 22(2):91-108.
    [19] Kyootai L, Aihua Y, Kailash J. Understanding the dynamics of us-ers’belief in software application adoption[J]. International Jour-nal of Information Management, 2011, 31(2):160-170.
    [20] Sutton S. Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior:How well are we doing?[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1998, 28(15):1317-1338.
    [21] Sheeran P. Intention—behavior relations:A conceptual and empir-ical review[J]. European Review of Social Psychology, 2002, 12(1):1-36.
    [22] Gollwitzer P M. Implementation intentions:Strong effects of sim-ple plans[J]. American Psychologist, 1999, 54:493-503.
    [23] Gollwitzer P M, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement:A meta-analysis of effects and processes[J]. Ad-vances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 38:249-268.
    [24] Ajzen I, Czasch C, Flood M G. From intention to behavior:Im-plementation intentions, commitment, and conscientiousness[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009, 39(2):1356-1372.
    [25] Allan J L, Johnston M, Campbell N. Why do people fail to turn good intentions into action? The role of executive control process-es in the translation of healthy eating intentions into action in young Scottish adults[J]. BMC Public Health, 2008, 8:1.
    [26] Fennis B M, Adriaanse M A, Stroebe W, et al. Bridging the inten-tion-behavior gap:Inducing implementation intentions through persuasive appeals[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2011, 21(3):302-311.
    [27] Chatzisarantis N L D, Hagger M S. Effects of implementation in-tentions linking suppression of alcohol consumption to socializ-ing goals on alcohol-related decisions[J]. Journal of Applied So-cial Psychology, 2010, 40(7):1618-1634.
    [28] Carter L, Bélanger F. The Utilization of e-government services:Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2005, 15(1):5-25.
    [29] Avgerou C, Ganzaroli A, Poulymenakou A, et al. Interpreting the trustworthiness of government mediated by information and com-munication technology:Lessons from electronic voting in Brazil[J]. Information Technology for Development, 2009, 15(2):133-148.
    [30] Nripendra P R, Yogesh K D, Michael D W. Evaluating alternative theoretical models for examining citizen centric adoption of egovernment[J]. Transforming Government:People, Process and Policy, 2013, 7(1):27-49.
    [31] Karavasilis I, Zafiropoulos K, Vrana V. Extending TAM to under-stand e-governance adoption by teachers in Greece[C]//Proceed-ings of the World Summit on Knowledge Society. Heidelberg:Springer, 2010, 112:57-68.
    [32]王华.影响公众对政府门户网站使用意愿的因素研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2006:12-22.
    [33]赵向异.我国政府网络平台持续使用的因素研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2007:10-24.
    [34]高明,陈永顺.公众使用政府门户网站服务的影响因素研究[J].情报杂志, 2012, 31(3):88-94.
    [35]廖敏慧,严中华,廖敏珍.政府网站公众接受度影响因素的实证研究[J].电子政务, 2015(3):95-105.
    [36]汤志伟,龚泽鹏,涂文琴,等.政府网站的公众初始采纳:从意向形成到行为产生[J].情报杂志, 2017(3):148-154.
    [37] Haroon S, Waqas Y S. E-government services in Pakistan[M]. Lu-lea University of Technology, Department of Business Adminis-tration and Social Sciences, Division of Information Systems Sci-ences. 2007:1-2.
    [38] Mariam R, Vatcharaporn E, Muhammad M K. Factors influenc-ing e-government adoption in Pakistan[J]. Transforming Govern-ment:People, Process and Policy, 2012, 6(3):258-282.
    [39] Shareef M A, Kumar V, Kumar U, et al. Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems[M]. Her-shey:IGI Global Publications, 2009:193-211.
    [40] Rogers E M.创新的扩散[M].辛欣,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2002.
    [41] Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions:Comparing the technolo-gy acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior[J]. In-formation Systems Research, 1991, 2(3):173-191.
    [42] Fazio R H, Zanna M. On the predictive validity of attitudes:The roles of direct experience and confidence[J]. Journal of Personali-ty, 1978, 46(2):228-243.
    [43] Conner M, Povey R, Sparks P, et al. Moderating role of attitudi-nal ambivalence within the theory of planned behavior[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2003, 42(1):75-94.
    [44] Yang H W C, Zhou L N. Extending TPB and TAM to mobile vi-ral marketing:An exploratory study on American young consum-ers’mobile viral marketing attitude, intent and behavior[J]. Jour-nal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 2011,19(2):85-98.
    [45] Ajzen I. From intentions to actions:A theory of planned behavior[M]. Heidelberg:Springer, 1985:11-39.
    [46] Kraft P, Rise J, Sutton S, et al. Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behavior:Perceived behavioral control or affective at-titude[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2005, 44(3):479-496.
    [47] Bandura A. Social learning theory[M]. Englewood Cliffs:Pren-tice Hall, 1977:102-125.
    [48] Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior:Habituation and reasoned action perspective[J]. Personality and Social Psy-chology Review, 2002, 6(2):107-122.
    [49] Rodgers W M, Conner M, Murray T C. Distinguishing among perceived control, perceived difficulty, and self-efficacy as deter-minants of intentions and behaviors[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 47(4):607-630.
    [50] Wang X. Integrating the theory of planned behavior and attitude functions:Implications for health campaign design[J]. Health Communication, 2009, 24(5):426-434.
    [51] Taylor S, Todd P A. Understanding information technology us-age:A test of competing models[J]. Information Systems Re-seach, 1995, 6(2):144-176.
    [52] Krishnaraju V, Mathew S K. Web personalization for user accep-tance of technology:An empirical investigation of e-government services[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2016, 18(3):579-595.
    [53] Heckhausen H, Gollwitzer P M. Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind[J].Motivation and Emotion, 1987, 11(2):101-120.
    [54]王林,时勘,赵杨.行为执行意向的理论观点及其相关研究[J].心理科学, 2014, 37(4):875-879.
    [55] Wieber F, Gollwitzer P M, Gottfried S. Limits of intentionality:An interdisciplinary approach[J]. Social Psychology, 2011, 42(1):4-8.
    [56] Bayer U C, Gollwitzer P M. Boosting scholastic test scores by willpower:The role of implementation intentions[J]. Self and Identity, 2007, 6(1):1-19.
    [57]胡小勇,郭永玉.执行意向对目标达成的促进及其作用过程[J].心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2):282-289
    [58]闫岩.计划行为理论的产生、发展和评述[J].国际新闻界,2014, 36(7):113-129.
    [59] Webb T L, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intention engen-der behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evi-dence[J]. Psychology Bulletin, 2006, 132(2):249-268.
    [60]王林,骆冬嬴,释海璋,等.基于执行意向的网购情景线索与行为反应关联模型研究[J].软科学, 2018, 32(1):118-121, 129.
    [61] Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(3):319-342.
    [62] Davis F D, Bagozzi R P, Wsrshaw P R. User acceptance of com-puter technology:A comparison of two theoretical models[J].Management Science, 1989, 35(8):982-1003.
    [63] Venkatesh V, Davis F D. A theoretical extension of the technolo-gy acceptance model:Four longitudinal filed studies[J]. Manage-ment Science, 2000, 46(2):186-204.
    [64]颜端武,刘国晓.近年来国外技术接受模型研究综述[J].现代情报, 2012, 32(2):167-177.
    [65] Hung S, Chang C, Yu T. Determinants of user acceptance of the egovernment services:The case of online tax filing and payment system[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2006, 23:97-122.
    [66] Horst M, Kuttsehreuter M, Gutteling J M. Perceived usefulness,personal experience, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands[J]. Comput-ers in Human Behavior, 2007, 23(4):1838-1852.
    [67] Al Khattab A, Al-Shalabi H, Al-Rawad M, et al. The effect of trust and risk perception on citizen’s intention to adopt and use egovernment services in Jordan[J]. Journal of Service Science and Management, 2015, 8(3):279-290.
    [68] Lee J H. Effects of trust and perceived risk on user acceptance of a new technology service[J]. Social Behavior and Personality,2013, 41(4):587-598.
    [69] Chen L D, Gilenson M L, Sherrel D L. Consumer acceptance of virtual stores:A theoretical model and critical success factors for virtual stores[J]. ACM SIGMIS Database:The Database for Ad-vances in Information Systems, 2004, 35(2):8-31.
    [70] Mofleh S I, Wanous M. Understanding factors influencing citi-zensadoption of e-government services in the developing world:Jordan as a case study[J]. INFOCOMP, 2008, 7(2):1-11.
    [71] Lee M, Turban E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping[J]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2001, 6(1):75-91.
    [72] Welch E W, Hinnant C C. Internet use, transparency and interac-tivity effects on trust in government[C]//Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society, 2003, 5:144.1.
    [73] Ranaweera H M B P. Perspective of trust towards e-government initiatives in Sri Lanka[J]. SpringerPlus, 2016, 5:22.
    [74] Bélanger F, Carter L. Trust and risk in e-government adoption[J].Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2008, 17(2):165-176.
    [75] Gilbert D, Balestrini P, Littleboy D. Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government[J]. International Journal of Public Sec-tor Management, 2013, 17(4):286-301.
    [76] Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1979, 47(2):26-291.
    [77] Brown A L, Kagel J H. Behavior in a simplified stock market:The status quo bias, the disposition effect and the ostrich effect[J]. Annals of Finance, 2009, 5(1):1-14.
    [78] Ciccone A. Resistance to reform:Status quo bias in the presence of individual-special uncertainty:Comment[J]. The American Economic Review, 2004, 94(3):785-795.
    [79] Inman J J, Zeelenberg M. Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions:The attenuating role of decision justifiability[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2002, 29(1):116-128.
    [80]李倩,侯碧梅.基于维持现状偏好理论的信息系统使用决策研究[J].管理评论, 2013, 25(1):44-51.
    [81] Hong E N, Kwahk K Y. Examining the determinants of mobile In-ternet service continuance:A customer relationship development perspective[J]. International Journal of Mobile Communications,2010, 8(2):210-229.
    [82] Lin T C, Huang S L, Hsu C J. A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product–The case of smartphone[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2015, 35(2):215-228.
    [83] DeVellis R F. Scale development:Theory and applications[M].London:SAGE Publications, 1991.
    [84] Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
    [85] Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and condition-al process analysis:A regression-based approach[M]. New York:Guilford Press, 2013.
    [86]世界银行教育和科学统计[EB/OL].[2018-07-01]. http://www.factfish.com/zh.
    [87] ITU. ICT development index 2017[EB/OL].[2018-07-01]. http://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html#idi2017economy-card-tab&PAK.
    (1)这里“其他模型中的相关因素”包括但不限于个人计算机利用模型(model of PC of utilization)中的工作适合性(job-fit)、创新扩散理论(innovation diffusion theory)中的相对优势(relative advantage),以及社会认知理论(social cognitive theory)中的产出期望(outcomes expectations)。