刑事立案前死因鉴定争议解决机制建构
|
摘要
在侦查机关根据本部门鉴定机构出具的死因鉴定意见而决定不予立案的案事件中,死者家属对鉴定意见有异议时,因为案件没有进入诉讼程序,所以没有通过审判程序解决对鉴定意见争议的机制,致使死者家属的诉求没有正常的解决渠道。为了得到死者死亡真相,促使相关公权力机关介入调查,死者家属通过上访、闹事,甚至引发社会性事件来寻求社会的关注。在我国刑事诉讼中建构刑事诉讼立案前司法鉴定意见争议解决机制,给予公民充分的参与权,可化解对刑事诉讼立案前鉴定意见的争议,维护社会的公平、正义、稳定。
When the investigating organ decides not to file a case according to the appraisal opinion of death cause issued by the appraisal institution of its internal department, and the family members disagree with the appraisal opinion, there is no mechanism to resolve the dispute over expert opinions through trial procedure, because the case has not entered the litigation stage. Thus the demands of the families of the deceased are not satisfied through a formal process. In order to get the truth of the death and prompt the relevant public authorities to intervene in the investigation, family members of the deceased will seek petitions, and even trigger social incidents. In the criminal procedure of our country, we should construct the dispute settlement mechanism of forensic expert opinions before filing criminal cases to give citizens full participation,resolve disputes over forensic expert opinions before litigation stage, and safeguard social fairness, justice and stability.
When the investigating organ decides not to file a case according to the appraisal opinion of death cause issued by the appraisal institution of its internal department, and the family members disagree with the appraisal opinion, there is no mechanism to resolve the dispute over expert opinions through trial procedure, because the case has not entered the litigation stage. Thus the demands of the families of the deceased are not satisfied through a formal process. In order to get the truth of the death and prompt the relevant public authorities to intervene in the investigation, family members of the deceased will seek petitions, and even trigger social incidents. In the criminal procedure of our country, we should construct the dispute settlement mechanism of forensic expert opinions before filing criminal cases to give citizens full participation,resolve disputes over forensic expert opinions before litigation stage, and safeguard social fairness, justice and stability.
引文
[1]王进忠.解读公安涉法上访(下)[J].辽宁警专学报,2008(3):38-41.
[2]王星译.死因鉴定意见审查判断规则之反思与重塑[J].证据科学,2017,25(4):467-486.
[3]郭华著.鉴定意见争议解决机制研究[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2013:71-73.
[4]霍宪丹.关于司法鉴定体制改革的实践与探索[J].证据科学,2007,15(Z1):84-89.
[5]陈俊生,刘朝宽.2009年司法部司法鉴定培训团《德国司法鉴定专题考察报告》[Z].中国司法行政年鉴,2011:746-748.
[6]黄风.意大利刑事诉讼法典[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
[7]张倩.死因争议求解之路[J/OL].民主与法制时报,(2013-09-02)[2018-08-10].http://news.hexun.com/2013-09-02/157645142.html.
[8]赵珊珊.司法鉴定主体格局的中国模式---以刑事诉讼法为范本的分析[J].证据科学,2013,21(1):62-70.
[9]陈如超.迈向“过程导向信任”的刑事死因鉴定争议解决机制[J].证据科学,2014(4):447-467.
[10]印波,李文艺.刑事死因鉴定争议解决机制研究[J].江西社会科学,2016(12):167-173.
[2]王星译.死因鉴定意见审查判断规则之反思与重塑[J].证据科学,2017,25(4):467-486.
[3]郭华著.鉴定意见争议解决机制研究[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2013:71-73.
[4]霍宪丹.关于司法鉴定体制改革的实践与探索[J].证据科学,2007,15(Z1):84-89.
[5]陈俊生,刘朝宽.2009年司法部司法鉴定培训团《德国司法鉴定专题考察报告》[Z].中国司法行政年鉴,2011:746-748.
[6]黄风.意大利刑事诉讼法典[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
[7]张倩.死因争议求解之路[J/OL].民主与法制时报,(2013-09-02)[2018-08-10].http://news.hexun.com/2013-09-02/157645142.html.
[8]赵珊珊.司法鉴定主体格局的中国模式---以刑事诉讼法为范本的分析[J].证据科学,2013,21(1):62-70.
[9]陈如超.迈向“过程导向信任”的刑事死因鉴定争议解决机制[J].证据科学,2014(4):447-467.
[10]印波,李文艺.刑事死因鉴定争议解决机制研究[J].江西社会科学,2016(12):167-173.