土地出让市场化、产业结构优化与城市绿色全要素生产率——基于湖北省的实证研究
|
摘要
研究目的:考察土地出让市场化与产业结构优化对城市绿色全要素生产率的影响程度及其作用机制。研究方法:SBM-DEA模型,动态面板广义矩估计(GMM)。研究结果:(1)无论是系统GMM还是差分GMM,土地出让市场化对绿色全要素生产率的影响系数均显著为正,产业结构合理化和高度化的影响系数也均显著为正,但后者的作用程度要明显大于前者;(2)土地出让市场化与产业结构合理化的交互项对绿色全要素生产率的影响系数为负,土地出让市场化与产业结构高度化的交互项对绿色全要素生产率的影响系数为正,且均通过显著性检验。研究结论:土地出让市场化总体上促进了绿色全要素生产率的发展;从作用机制来看,土地出让市场化导致了产业结构合理化的反向发展,抑制了绿色全要素生产率的提升;同时,也促进了产业结构高度化的正向发展,进而对绿色全要素生产率有提升作用。鉴于此,提出:(1)地方政府应继续坚持以市场化为导向的城市土地制度改革;(2)政府应适时引导产业结构调整,促进产业结构转型和升级,更加重视经济增长与环境保护的协调发展。
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of land leasing marketization on urban green total factor productivity and its mechanism. The methods used include SBM-DEA model and GMM model. The results show that: 1)regardless of system GMM or differential GMM, the coefficients of land leasing marketization on green total factor productivity are significantly positive, and the coefficients of industrial structure rationalization and advancement are also significantly positive, but the degree of the effect of the latter is obviously greater than that of the former. 2)The interaction between land leasing marketization and industrial structure rationalization has a negative impact on green total factor productivity, while the interaction between land leasing marketization and industrial structure advancement has a positive impact on green total factor productivity, and all of them have passed the significance test. This paper concludes that: 1)land leasing marketization promotes the development of green total factor productivity on the whole. 2)From the perspective of mechanism, land leasing marketization leads to the reverse development of industrial structure rationalization and restrains the promotion of green total factor productivity, while it also promotes the positive development of industrial structure advancement, thus promoting green total factor productivity. In view of this, local governments should continue to adhere to the market-oriented urban land institutional reform, guide the adjustment of industrial structure in a timely manner, promote the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure and pay more attention to the coordinated development of economic growth and environmental protection.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of land leasing marketization on urban green total factor productivity and its mechanism. The methods used include SBM-DEA model and GMM model. The results show that: 1)regardless of system GMM or differential GMM, the coefficients of land leasing marketization on green total factor productivity are significantly positive, and the coefficients of industrial structure rationalization and advancement are also significantly positive, but the degree of the effect of the latter is obviously greater than that of the former. 2)The interaction between land leasing marketization and industrial structure rationalization has a negative impact on green total factor productivity, while the interaction between land leasing marketization and industrial structure advancement has a positive impact on green total factor productivity, and all of them have passed the significance test. This paper concludes that: 1)land leasing marketization promotes the development of green total factor productivity on the whole. 2)From the perspective of mechanism, land leasing marketization leads to the reverse development of industrial structure rationalization and restrains the promotion of green total factor productivity, while it also promotes the positive development of industrial structure advancement, thus promoting green total factor productivity. In view of this, local governments should continue to adhere to the market-oriented urban land institutional reform, guide the adjustment of industrial structure in a timely manner, promote the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure and pay more attention to the coordinated development of economic growth and environmental protection.
引文
[1]李斌,彭星,欧阳铭珂.环境规制、绿色全要素生产率与中国工业发展方式转变——基于36个工业行业数据的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2013(4):56-68.
[2]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):41-55.
[3] CHEN W, SHEN Y, WANG Y N. Does industrial land price lead to industrial diffusion in China? An empirical study from a spatial perspective[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2018, 40:307-316.
[4]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化?——基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[5]黄金升,陈利根,张耀宇,等.中国工业地价与产业结构变迁互动效应研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(4):585-596.
[6]唐未兵,傅元海,王展祥.技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J].经济研究,2014,49(7):31-43.
[7]刘赢时,田银华,罗迎.产业结构升级、能源效率与绿色全要素生产率[J].财经理论与实践,2018,39(1):118-126.
[8]赵宇.技术进步与产业结构对环境污染治理投资的影响研究——基于全要素生产率的变化及其分解[J].生态经济,2018,34(7):79-82,87.
[9]干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011,46(5):4-16,31.
[10]韩永辉,黄亮雄,王贤彬.产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016,33(4):40-59.
[11]罗能生,彭郁,罗富政.土地市场化对城市土地综合利用效率的影响[J].城市问题,2016(11):21-28.
[12]赵爱栋,马贤磊,曲福田.市场化改革能提高中国工业用地利用效率吗?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(3):118-126.
[13]李江龙,徐斌.“诅咒”还是“福音”:资源丰裕程度如何影响中国绿色经济增长?[J].经济研究,2018,53(9):151-167.
[14]刘华军,李超,彭莹.中国绿色全要素生产率的地区差距及区域协同提升研究[J].中国人口科学,2018(4):30-41,126.
[15]徐升艳,陈杰,赵刚.土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长[J].中国工业经济,2018(3):44-61.
[16]杨继东,杨其静.保增长压力、刺激计划与工业用地出让[J].经济研究,2016,51(1):99-113.
[17] WU Y, ZHANG X, SKITMORE M, et al. Industrial land price and its impact on urban growth:a Chinese case study[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36:199-209..
[18]藏波,吕萍,赵松.中国园区建设中的工业地价、产业升级及其地区差异:城市层面的产业发展雁行模型[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(8):24-32.
[19]朱卫平,陈林.产业升级的内涵与模式研究——以广东产业升级为例[J].经济学家,2011(2):60-66.
[20]梅冬州,崔小勇,吴娱.房价变动、土地财政与中国经济波动[J].经济研究,2018,53(1):35-49.
[21]刘伟,张辉,黄泽华.中国产业结构高度与工业化进程和地区差异的考察[J].经济学动态,2008(11):4-8.
[22] F RE R, GROSSKOPF S, PASURKA JR C A. Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity[J].Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(3-4):673-682.
[23]王兵,刘光天.节能减排与中国绿色经济增长——基于全要素生产率的视角[J].中国工业经济,2015(5):57-69.
[24] TONE K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in dea:a slacksbased measure(sbm)approach[R]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2003-2005.
[25]邱斌,杨帅,辛培江. FDI技术溢出渠道与中国制造业生产率增长研究:基于面板数据的分析[J].世界经济,2008,31(8):20-31.
[26]钱忠好,牟燕.中国土地市场化水平:测度及分析[J].管理世界,2012(7):67-75,95.
[27]王青,陈志刚,叶依广,等.中国土地市场化进程的时空特征分析[J].资源科学,2007(1):43-47.
[28]常修泽,高明华.中国国民经济市场化的推进程度及发展思路[J].经济研究,1998(11):49-56.
[29] KUZNETS S. Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations:II. industrial distribution of national product and labor force[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1957, 5(S4):1-111.
[30]吕明元,陈维宣.中国产业结构升级对能源效率的影响研究——基于1978—2013年数据[J].资源科学,2016,38(7):1350-1362.
[31]吴敬琏.中国增长模式抉择(增订版)[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2008:64-70.
[32]梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析——基于287个地级以上城市的实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
[33]张军,高远,傅勇,等.中国为什么拥有了良好的基础设施?[J].经济研究,2007(3):4-19.
[34]林伯强,杜克锐.要素市场扭曲对能源效率的影响[J].经济研究,2013,48(9):125-136.
[2]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):41-55.
[3] CHEN W, SHEN Y, WANG Y N. Does industrial land price lead to industrial diffusion in China? An empirical study from a spatial perspective[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2018, 40:307-316.
[4]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化?——基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[5]黄金升,陈利根,张耀宇,等.中国工业地价与产业结构变迁互动效应研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(4):585-596.
[6]唐未兵,傅元海,王展祥.技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J].经济研究,2014,49(7):31-43.
[7]刘赢时,田银华,罗迎.产业结构升级、能源效率与绿色全要素生产率[J].财经理论与实践,2018,39(1):118-126.
[8]赵宇.技术进步与产业结构对环境污染治理投资的影响研究——基于全要素生产率的变化及其分解[J].生态经济,2018,34(7):79-82,87.
[9]干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011,46(5):4-16,31.
[10]韩永辉,黄亮雄,王贤彬.产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016,33(4):40-59.
[11]罗能生,彭郁,罗富政.土地市场化对城市土地综合利用效率的影响[J].城市问题,2016(11):21-28.
[12]赵爱栋,马贤磊,曲福田.市场化改革能提高中国工业用地利用效率吗?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(3):118-126.
[13]李江龙,徐斌.“诅咒”还是“福音”:资源丰裕程度如何影响中国绿色经济增长?[J].经济研究,2018,53(9):151-167.
[14]刘华军,李超,彭莹.中国绿色全要素生产率的地区差距及区域协同提升研究[J].中国人口科学,2018(4):30-41,126.
[15]徐升艳,陈杰,赵刚.土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长[J].中国工业经济,2018(3):44-61.
[16]杨继东,杨其静.保增长压力、刺激计划与工业用地出让[J].经济研究,2016,51(1):99-113.
[17] WU Y, ZHANG X, SKITMORE M, et al. Industrial land price and its impact on urban growth:a Chinese case study[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36:199-209..
[18]藏波,吕萍,赵松.中国园区建设中的工业地价、产业升级及其地区差异:城市层面的产业发展雁行模型[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(8):24-32.
[19]朱卫平,陈林.产业升级的内涵与模式研究——以广东产业升级为例[J].经济学家,2011(2):60-66.
[20]梅冬州,崔小勇,吴娱.房价变动、土地财政与中国经济波动[J].经济研究,2018,53(1):35-49.
[21]刘伟,张辉,黄泽华.中国产业结构高度与工业化进程和地区差异的考察[J].经济学动态,2008(11):4-8.
[22] F RE R, GROSSKOPF S, PASURKA JR C A. Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity[J].Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(3-4):673-682.
[23]王兵,刘光天.节能减排与中国绿色经济增长——基于全要素生产率的视角[J].中国工业经济,2015(5):57-69.
[24] TONE K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in dea:a slacksbased measure(sbm)approach[R]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2003-2005.
[25]邱斌,杨帅,辛培江. FDI技术溢出渠道与中国制造业生产率增长研究:基于面板数据的分析[J].世界经济,2008,31(8):20-31.
[26]钱忠好,牟燕.中国土地市场化水平:测度及分析[J].管理世界,2012(7):67-75,95.
[27]王青,陈志刚,叶依广,等.中国土地市场化进程的时空特征分析[J].资源科学,2007(1):43-47.
[28]常修泽,高明华.中国国民经济市场化的推进程度及发展思路[J].经济研究,1998(11):49-56.
[29] KUZNETS S. Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations:II. industrial distribution of national product and labor force[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1957, 5(S4):1-111.
[30]吕明元,陈维宣.中国产业结构升级对能源效率的影响研究——基于1978—2013年数据[J].资源科学,2016,38(7):1350-1362.
[31]吴敬琏.中国增长模式抉择(增订版)[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2008:64-70.
[32]梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析——基于287个地级以上城市的实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
[33]张军,高远,傅勇,等.中国为什么拥有了良好的基础设施?[J].经济研究,2007(3):4-19.
[34]林伯强,杜克锐.要素市场扭曲对能源效率的影响[J].经济研究,2013,48(9):125-136.