临汾麦区麦长管蚜对常用杀虫剂的抗药性风险
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Resistance Risk of Sitobion avenae to Common Insecticides in Linfen Wheat Area
  • 作者:武银玉 ; 曹亚萍 ; 赵飞 ; 邢鲲
  • 英文作者:WU Yinyu;CAO Yaping;ZHAO Fei;XING Kun;Institute of Wheat,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Institute of Plant Protection,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
  • 关键词:麦长管蚜 ; 杀虫剂 ; 抗药性
  • 英文关键词:Sitobion avenae;;insecticides;;resistance
  • 中文刊名:SXLX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:山西省农业科学院小麦研究所;山西省农业科学院植物保护研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-18
  • 出版单位:山西农业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.47;No.400
  • 基金:农业有害生物综合治理山西省重点实验室开放课题(YHAW2018001);; 山西省农业科学院农业科技创新研究课题(YCX2018412)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SXLX201906030
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:14-1113/S
  • 分类号:139-142
摘要
为明确临汾市麦区麦长管蚜的抗药性现状,田间采集临汾市尧都区、襄汾县、洪洞县3个小麦主产区麦长管蚜种群,采用玻璃管药膜法测定其对吡虫啉、啶虫脒、吡蚜酮、抗蚜威、高效氯氰菊酯、毒死蜱6种常用药剂的抗药性水平。结果显示,临汾麦区麦长管蚜种群对抗蚜威已经产生高抗,抗性倍数为65.67~101.17,以尧都区抗性倍数最高;对毒死蜱产生中抗,抗性倍数为12.41~21.87,襄汾种群抗性水平最高;对吡虫啉处于相对敏感水平或者已经产生低抗,抗性倍数为1.56~5.08,尚处于抗性发展阶段;3个种群对啶虫脒、吡蚜酮、高效氯氰菊酯均比较敏感或无抗性。建议在该地区禁用抗蚜威和毒死蜱,交替使用吡虫啉,延缓麦蚜抗药性的发展。
        To clarify the resistance status of Sitobion avenae in Linfen wheat area, the resistance levels of Sitobion avenae to six common insecticides, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, pymetrozine, pirimicard, beta-cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos in three main wheat producing areas of Yaodu, Xiangfen and Hongtong in Linfen was determined by the glass tube film method. The results showed that the Sitobion avenae population in Linfen had high resistance to pirimicard, the resistance multiple was 65.67-101.17, the highest was in Yaodu area. The resistance multiple to chlorpyrifos was 12.41-21.87, the highest was in Xiangfen population. The resistance to imidacloprid was at a relative sensitive level or had produced a low resistance, the resistance multiple was 1.56-5.08, which was sitll in the stage of resistance development. The three populations were sensitive or non-resistant to pyrimidine, pymetrozine and beta-cypermethrin. It is recommended to ban pirimicard and chlorpyrifos in the area, use imidacloprid alternately to delay the development of wheat aphid resistance.
引文
[1]陈巨莲.小麦蚜虫及其防治[M].北京:金盾出版社,2014.
    [2]马春森,马罡,赵飞.气候变暖对麦蚜的影响[J].应用昆虫学报,2014,51(6):1435-1443.
    [3]曹雅忠,尹姣,李克斌,等.小麦蚜虫不断猖獗原因及控制对策的探讨[J].植物保护,2006,32(5):72-75.
    [4]全国农业技术推广服务中心,中国农业大学,河南省植保站,等. NY/T 2726—2015小麦蚜虫抗药性监测技术规程[S].北京:农业部,2015.
    [5]李宏德.田间麦蚜和实验室麦蚜抗药性毒力测定和生化测定的研究[J].甘肃农业,2016(2):33-40.
    [6]武怀恒,万鹏,黄民松.毒力回归计算方法及相应软件介绍[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(27):9335-9338.
    [7]鲁艳辉,杨婷,高希武.禾谷缢管蚜和麦长管蚜玻璃管药膜法敏感毒力基线的建立[J].昆虫学报,2009,52(1):52-58.
    [8]邱高辉.麦长管蚜对吡虫啉的抗性及其机理研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2007.
    [9]张柳平.麦长管蚜和禾谷缢管蚜的抗药性研究[D].曲阜:曲阜师范大学,2013.
    [10]韩晓莉,高占林,党志红,等.不同地区麦长管蚜对氯代烟碱类杀虫剂的敏感性[J].华北农学报,2007,22(5):157-160.
    [11]刘帅.全国农技中心通报2015年全国农业有害生物抗药性监测结果[J].农药市场信息,2016(10):58-60.
    [12]韩巨才,刘慧平,徐建岗,等.山西麦长管蚜对拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂抗药性研究[J].山西农业科学,1996,24(2):26-28.
    [13]刘慧平,韩巨才,赵晋蓉.山西麦长管蚜抗药性研究[J].山西农业大学学报,1998(2):180-182.
    [14]刘爱芝,李素娟,武予清,等.三种杀虫剂对麦田蚜虫和捕食性天敌群落的影响[J].植物保护学报,2002,29(1):183-187.
    [15]刘爱芝,李素娟,武予清.同性质的杀虫剂对麦蚜天敌的影响[J].华北农学报,2001,16(4):100-103.
    [16]孙红炜,尚佑芬,赵玖华,等.不同药剂对麦蚜的防治作用及对麦田天敌昆虫的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2007,27(3):543-547.
    [17]李亮,付晓伟,郭线茹,等.几种药剂对2种麦蚜的室内毒力和田间药效[J].河南农业科学,2009(2):271-275.
    [18]张存环,李雅丽,李兰,等.陕西关中地区苹果黄蚜对3种杀虫剂的抗药性评估[J].陕西农业科学,2018,64(10):29-31.