文化记忆理论视野下先秦时代文本书写与流变——以上海博物馆藏战国楚简(七)《武王践阼》为例
|
摘要
收录于《大戴礼记》中的传世本《武王践阼》,随着《上海博物馆藏战国楚简》的公布而有了可供观察比较的出土文献版本,为探讨中国先秦时代文本书写和演变提供了第一手的研究资料。扬·阿斯曼文化记忆理论的提出为解读古代书写文化的传承和发展提供了新的途径。文章基于文化记忆理论,以《武王践阼》为例,从传世本和简本甲乙本在文本构成和叙事手法的不同入手,考察不同社会群体文化记忆的变迁以及所造成的承载文化记忆的载体文本在不同历史发展阶段的差异性。
With the excavation of bamboo slips of Chu in the Warring States Period collected by Shanghai Museum, the handed down edition of Wu Wang Jian Zuo included in Da Dai Li Ji has had unearthed literature that can be observed and compared, which may provide the first-hand research materials for the text writing and evolution in the Chinese early Pre-qin period. The theory of cultural memory proposed by Jan Assmann provides a new means for the interpretation of the heritage and development of the traditional writing culture. Based on the theory of culture memory, this paper, taking Wu Wang Jian Zuo as an example, observes the changes of cultural memory of the different social groups from the perspective of textual composition and narrative technique in the handed down edition and abridged edition as well as the differences between the carriers of culture memory at different historical stages.
With the excavation of bamboo slips of Chu in the Warring States Period collected by Shanghai Museum, the handed down edition of Wu Wang Jian Zuo included in Da Dai Li Ji has had unearthed literature that can be observed and compared, which may provide the first-hand research materials for the text writing and evolution in the Chinese early Pre-qin period. The theory of cultural memory proposed by Jan Assmann provides a new means for the interpretation of the heritage and development of the traditional writing culture. Based on the theory of culture memory, this paper, taking Wu Wang Jian Zuo as an example, observes the changes of cultural memory of the different social groups from the perspective of textual composition and narrative technique in the handed down edition and abridged edition as well as the differences between the carriers of culture memory at different historical stages.
引文
[1] 金寿福.扬·阿斯曼的文化记忆理论[J].外国语文,2017(2):36-40.
[2] [德]扬·阿斯曼.文化记忆:早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份[M].金寿福,黄晓晨,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[3] 赖国栋.在历史和现实中穿行——读扬·阿斯曼《文化记忆:早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份》[J].历史理论研究,2016(1):152-156.
[4] 陈佩芬.武王践阼释文考释[M]//上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书(七).上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:149-150.
[5] 复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心.《上博七·武王践阼》校读[EB/OL].(2008-12-30)[2019-02-20] http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/SrcShow.asp?Src_ID=576.
[6] 复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心.再论《武王践阼》是两个版本[EB/OL].(2018-12-20)[2009-01-08]http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/SrcShow.asp?Src_ID=639.
[7] 李松儒.上博七《武王践阼》的抄写特征及文本构成[J].江汉考古,2015(2):110-115.
[8] 许兆昌.试论《武王践阼》的文本流变[J].古代文明,2015(2):42-54.
[9] 李学勤.简帛佚籍与学术史[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,2001:382.
[10] [法] 罗兰·巴特.叙事作品结构分析导论[M]//伍蠡甫,胡经之,主编.西方文艺理论名著选编:下卷.北京:北京大学出版社,1987 :473 .
[11] 程光炜.叙事:中西不同的理解视角[J].学术研究,2017(1):2-7.
[12] 陈淳.从考古学理论方法进展谈古史重建[J].历史研究,2018(6):4-20.
[2] [德]扬·阿斯曼.文化记忆:早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份[M].金寿福,黄晓晨,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[3] 赖国栋.在历史和现实中穿行——读扬·阿斯曼《文化记忆:早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份》[J].历史理论研究,2016(1):152-156.
[4] 陈佩芬.武王践阼释文考释[M]//上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书(七).上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:149-150.
[5] 复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心.《上博七·武王践阼》校读[EB/OL].(2008-12-30)[2019-02-20] http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/SrcShow.asp?Src_ID=576.
[6] 复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心.再论《武王践阼》是两个版本[EB/OL].(2018-12-20)[2009-01-08]http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/SrcShow.asp?Src_ID=639.
[7] 李松儒.上博七《武王践阼》的抄写特征及文本构成[J].江汉考古,2015(2):110-115.
[8] 许兆昌.试论《武王践阼》的文本流变[J].古代文明,2015(2):42-54.
[9] 李学勤.简帛佚籍与学术史[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,2001:382.
[10] [法] 罗兰·巴特.叙事作品结构分析导论[M]//伍蠡甫,胡经之,主编.西方文艺理论名著选编:下卷.北京:北京大学出版社,1987 :473 .
[11] 程光炜.叙事:中西不同的理解视角[J].学术研究,2017(1):2-7.
[12] 陈淳.从考古学理论方法进展谈古史重建[J].历史研究,2018(6):4-20.