我国高等教育改革动力机制解析与重构
|
摘要
党的十一届三中全会以来,我国高等教育改革全面展开并不断深化,主要经历了起步探索、重点推进、综合推进和全面深化四个发展阶段。改革动力机制总体呈现出政府主导、政策驱动的国家行动特征,在有效保证经济社会发展和高等教育自身实现跨越式发展的同时,也存在着行政权力过度、法制约束不足、高校主体地位重视不够、市场作用发挥不到位以及改革内生动力不强的问题。面对新时代的新矛盾、新战略、新任务和新要求,必须以善治为目标着力提高政府高等教育治理能力、以增效为核心充分发挥市场牵动作用、以还权为重点全面激活高校改革的内生动力、以协同为基础重构上下结合以及内外协调的高等教育改革动力模式。
Since the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, China's higher education reform has been carried out in an all-round way and deepened continuously. It has generally experienced four development stages: initial exploration, key advancement, comprehensive promotion and comprehensive deepening. The motive mechanism of reform generally presents the characteristics of national action which focus on government-led and policy-driven. While effectively guaranteeing the economic and social development and the leap-forward development of higher education, there are also problems such as the excessive administrative power, insufficient legal restraint, insufficient attention to the main body status of universities, as well as inadequate market role and weak endogenous motive force of reform. Faced with the new contradictions,new strategies, new tasks and new requirements of the new era, it is significant to improve the government's ability to govern higher education with the goal of good governance, give full play to the market-driven role by the core of efficiency, fully activate the endogenous driving force of university reform with the emphasis on power restitution, and construct an overall driving force model of higher education reform based on synergy.
Since the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, China's higher education reform has been carried out in an all-round way and deepened continuously. It has generally experienced four development stages: initial exploration, key advancement, comprehensive promotion and comprehensive deepening. The motive mechanism of reform generally presents the characteristics of national action which focus on government-led and policy-driven. While effectively guaranteeing the economic and social development and the leap-forward development of higher education, there are also problems such as the excessive administrative power, insufficient legal restraint, insufficient attention to the main body status of universities, as well as inadequate market role and weak endogenous motive force of reform. Faced with the new contradictions,new strategies, new tasks and new requirements of the new era, it is significant to improve the government's ability to govern higher education with the goal of good governance, give full play to the market-driven role by the core of efficiency, fully activate the endogenous driving force of university reform with the emphasis on power restitution, and construct an overall driving force model of higher education reform based on synergy.
引文
[1]埃里克·阿什比.科技发达时代的大学教育[M].滕大春,滕大生,等译.北京:人民教育出版社,1983:114.
[2]伯顿R克拉克.高等教育系统———学术组织的跨国研究[M].王承绪,等译.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1994:158-159.
[3]刘国瑞.我国高等教育发展动力系统的演进与优化[J].高等教育研究,2018(12).
[4]夏鲁惠.我国高等教育体制改革40年回顾与展望[J].中国发展观察,2018(24).
[5]赵丽.改革开放40年我国高等教育分权改革:历程、经验与趋势[J].齐鲁学刊,2018(6).
[6]徐永.国家行动与中国教育发展的动力机制———基于改革开放以来的实践经验[J],现代教育管理,2018(10).
[7]王旭.自我觉醒与法律保障:高校自主权落实的路径与依托[J].现代教育管理,2017(7).
[2]伯顿R克拉克.高等教育系统———学术组织的跨国研究[M].王承绪,等译.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1994:158-159.
[3]刘国瑞.我国高等教育发展动力系统的演进与优化[J].高等教育研究,2018(12).
[4]夏鲁惠.我国高等教育体制改革40年回顾与展望[J].中国发展观察,2018(24).
[5]赵丽.改革开放40年我国高等教育分权改革:历程、经验与趋势[J].齐鲁学刊,2018(6).
[6]徐永.国家行动与中国教育发展的动力机制———基于改革开放以来的实践经验[J],现代教育管理,2018(10).
[7]王旭.自我觉醒与法律保障:高校自主权落实的路径与依托[J].现代教育管理,2017(7).