人工智能与刑事诉讼的结合与续造
|
摘要
推动人工智能与诉讼程序结合是司法体制改革、建设法治中国的内生动力,是大数据背景下新的时代命题。将人工智能引入刑事立案程序,可以充分发挥人工智能以保护公民隐私为前提的大数据侦查之优势,避免人为泄露涉案人员隐私。人工智能对案件的识别和分配管辖,利于精准确定案件管辖法院。此外,人工智能是否具有法律人格也是解决人工智能的责任、著作权归属、权利保护等问题的前提条件。
Promoting the combination of artificial intelligence and litigation procedures is the endogenous driving force for the reform of the judicial system and the construction of the rule of law in China. It is a new era proposition in the context of big data. The introduction of artificial intelligence into the criminal case filing process can give full play to the advantages of big data detection based on the premise of protecting citizens' privacy by artificial intelligence, so as to avoid the artificial disclosure of the privacy of the personnel involved. The identification and distribution of jurisdiction by artificial intelligence is conducive to the accurate determination of the court under the jurisdiction of the case. In addition, whether artificial intelligence has legal personality is also the precondition to solve the problems of responsibility, ownership of copyright and protection of rights of artificial intelligence.
Promoting the combination of artificial intelligence and litigation procedures is the endogenous driving force for the reform of the judicial system and the construction of the rule of law in China. It is a new era proposition in the context of big data. The introduction of artificial intelligence into the criminal case filing process can give full play to the advantages of big data detection based on the premise of protecting citizens' privacy by artificial intelligence, so as to avoid the artificial disclosure of the privacy of the personnel involved. The identification and distribution of jurisdiction by artificial intelligence is conducive to the accurate determination of the court under the jurisdiction of the case. In addition, whether artificial intelligence has legal personality is also the precondition to solve the problems of responsibility, ownership of copyright and protection of rights of artificial intelligence.
引文
[1]司晓,曹建峰.论人工智能的民事责任:以自动驾驶汽车和智能机器人为切入点[J].法律科学,2017(5):166-173.
[2]郑戈.“人工智能”与法律的未来[J].探索与争鸣,2017(10):78-84.
[3]潘庸鲁.人工智能介入司法领域路径分析[J].东方法学,2018(3):109-118.
[4]于阳,魏俊斌.冲突与弥合:大数据侦查监控模式下的个人信息保护[J].情报杂志,2018(12):9.
[5]孟建柱.主动拥抱新一轮科技革命全面深化司法体制改革努力创造更高水平的社会主义司法文明[N].检查日报,2017-07-12(1).
[6]徐全盛.深圳“智慧法院”智在哪里[EB/OL].(2018-02-05)[2018-12-18].http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-82402.html.
[7]时方.人工智能刑事主体地位之否定[J].法律科学,2018(6):67-75.
[8]倪寿明.充分挖掘司法大数据的超凡价值[J].人民司法,2017(19):1.
[2]郑戈.“人工智能”与法律的未来[J].探索与争鸣,2017(10):78-84.
[3]潘庸鲁.人工智能介入司法领域路径分析[J].东方法学,2018(3):109-118.
[4]于阳,魏俊斌.冲突与弥合:大数据侦查监控模式下的个人信息保护[J].情报杂志,2018(12):9.
[5]孟建柱.主动拥抱新一轮科技革命全面深化司法体制改革努力创造更高水平的社会主义司法文明[N].检查日报,2017-07-12(1).
[6]徐全盛.深圳“智慧法院”智在哪里[EB/OL].(2018-02-05)[2018-12-18].http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-82402.html.
[7]时方.人工智能刑事主体地位之否定[J].法律科学,2018(6):67-75.
[8]倪寿明.充分挖掘司法大数据的超凡价值[J].人民司法,2017(19):1.